Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:25:49.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interest rate rules and macroeconomic stabilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Mark Weder*
Affiliation:
School of Economics, The University of Adelaide, Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin,CDMA and CEPR
Get access

Summary

High degrees of relative risk aversion induce indeterminacy in cash-in-advance economies. This paper finds that Taylor-style policies can preempt such sunspot equilibria. Specific policy recommendations depend on the fundamentals of the economy, i.e. the empirically true value of coefficient of relative risk aversion.

Résumé:

Résumé:

Un haut degré d'aversion au risque induit de l'indétermination dans une économie où une règle de cash-in-advance est intégrée. Cet article montre que des politiques « à la Taylor » peuvent éviter de tels équilibres de taches solaires. Les recommandations spécifiques de politique économiques dépendent des fondamentaux de l'économie, c'est-à-dire de la valeur empirique du coefficient d'aversion relative au risque.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was written while I was a DFG Heisenberg Fellow. I would like to thank the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco for its hospitality as well as Chuck Carlstrom and one anonymous referee for helpful comments.

References

Auray, S., Collard, F. and Feve, P. (2005), “Habit Persistence, Exogenous Money Growth Rule and Real Indeterminacy”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 8, pp. 4867.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M. (2003), “Backward-Looking Interest-Rate Rules, Interest Rate Smoothing and Macroeconomic Instability”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35, pp. 13791412.Google Scholar
Carlstrom, C. and Fuerst, T. (2000), “Forward-Looking Versus Backward-Looking Taylor Rules”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper n°00–99, Cleveland.Google Scholar
Carlstrom, C. and Fuerst, T. (1999), Forecasts and Sunspots : Looking Back for a Better Future, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Commentary.Google Scholar
Clarida, R., Gali, J. and Gertler, M. (2000), “Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability : Evidence and Some Theory”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, pp. 147180.Google Scholar
Christiano, L. (2000), “Comment on : Theoretical Analysis Regarding a Zero Lower Bound on Nominal Interest Rates by Bennett T. McCallum”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 32, pp. 870904.Google Scholar
Farmer, R. (1999), The Macroeconomics of Self-fulfilling Prophecies, 2nd edition, Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giannoni, M. and Woodford, M. (2002), “Optimal Interest Rate Rules : II. Applications”, Princeton University, mimeographed.Google Scholar
Hansen, L. and Singleton, K. (1983), “Stochastic Consumption, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Asset Returns”, Journal of Political Economy, 91, pp. 249265.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (1999), “A Historical Analysis of Monetary Policy Rules”, in Taylor, John B., Monetary Policy Rules, Chicago, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Weder, M. (2003), “Taylor Rules and Macroeconomic Instability or How the Central Bank Can Pre-empt Sunspot Expectations”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Weder, M. (2004), “Endogenous Monetary Growth Rules and Determinacy in Cash-in-Advance Models”, Economics Bulletin, 5, pp. 17.Google Scholar