Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:26:17.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rules versus play in early modern art markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Neil de Marchi  and
Hans J. van Miegroet
Neil de Marchi
Affiliation:
Duke University, Durham, USA
Hans J. van Miegroet
Affiliation:
Duke University, Durham, USA
Get access

Summary

The paper identifies and tries to account for the forms taken in selected art markets for the selling of paintings, as a response to specific features and constraints in the local regulatory environment. Our analytical histories cover 15th century Bruges, 16th century Antwerp, 17th century Amsterdam, and early 18th century London and Paris. They yield some evidence that : (1) restrictive guilds did not succeed in stifling innovation. though innovators were forced to take indirect routes and to adopt forms not always the most efficient; (2) where circumstances allowed a choice of auction form (English or Dutch) the method selected matched the prior experience of buyers (low or high respectively) ; and (3) in the single instance where guilds were open to cooperation across skill categories this coincided with a series of marketing experiments and a range of novel products.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article vise à identifier et à expliquer les formes spécifiques prises par les marchés de tableaux en réponse au contexte historique, en particulier le système de réglementation. Les analyses présentées couvrent Bruges au 15éme siècle, Anvers au 16éme siècle, Amsterdam au 17éme siècle et, enfin, Londres et Paris, au début du 18éme. Trois résultats sont avancés. Premièrement, la présence de corporations ayant des pratiques restrictives n’a pas réussi à étouffer l’innovation mais a poussé les innovateurs à emprunter des voies détournées et à adopter des formes relativement inefficientes. Deuxièmement, lorsque les circonstances permettaient le choix entre des formes différentes d’enchères (anglaise ou hollandaise), ce choix s’effectuait en fonction de l’expérience antérieure des vendeurs. Troisièmement, le seul cas où il s’est avéré que les corporations ont été ouvertes à une coopération entre travailleurs de qualification différente se caractérise par un contexte d'expérimentation de marché et d’émergence de nouveaux produits.

Keywords

RegulationInstitutionsMarketsD2D4L1D2D4L1
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , 2000 , pp. 145 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Our thanks to Marina Bianchi, Charles Baden-Fuller and David Ormrod for stimulating conversations, and to Victor Ginsburgh and an anonymous referee for querying our formulations at many points. Thanks also to Brian Cowan for letting us see his Ph.D. manuscript and to Carolyn Sargentson, Alicia Weissberg-Roberts, and Filip Vermeylen for clarifying details cencerning the Paris and Antwerp situations.

References

Alpers, Svetlana (1995), The Making of Rubens. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Appleby, Joyce (1976), “Ideology and Theory : The Tension between Political and Economic Liberalism in Seventeenth-Century England,” American Historical Review 81: 500–000Google Scholar
Bateman, Joseph (1838), A Practical Treatise on the Law of Auctions. Maxwell, London.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Marina (1993), “How to Learn Sociality : True and False Solutions to Mandeville’s Problem,” History of Political Economy 25 : 209–40.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Marina (2000), “Product variety, innovation, and conformity,” University of Cassino, mimeo.Google Scholar
Beckett, J.V. (1985), “Land Tax of Excise : the levying of taxation in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century England,” English Kistorical Review 100: 285–308.Google Scholar
Bikhchandani, S., Hirschleifer, D., and Welch, I. (1992), “A Theory of Fads. Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades,’” Journal of Political Economy 100 : 992–1026.Google Scholar
Bikhchandani, S., Hirschleifer., D., and Welch, I. (1998), “Learning from the Behavior of Others : Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 : 151–70.Google Scholar
[Bramston, James] (1733), The Man of Taste, reprinted in Gilmore, Thomas B. (ed.), Early Eighteenth-Century Essays on Taste. Delmar, New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles … Reprints, 1972 : 87–102.Google Scholar
Casteele, D. Van de, (1866), “Documents divers de la Société S. Luc à Bruges. Première partie : Keuren,” Annales de la Société d’Emulation de Bruges, 3e série, 1 : 5–54.Google Scholar
Cowan, Brian (1998), “Arenas of Connoisseurship : Auctioning Art in Later Stuart England,” in Michael, North and Ormrod, David (eds). Art Markets in Europe, I4OO–I8OO. Aldershot: Ashgate: 153–66.Google Scholar
Cowan, Brian (2000), “The Social Life of Coffee : Commercial Culture and Metropolitan Society in Early Modern England, 1600–1720.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Crow, Thomas E. (1985), Painters and Public Life in Eighteenth-Century Paris. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, K.G. (1952), “Join-Stock Investment in the Later Seventeenth Century,” The Economic History Review, second series IV : 283–301.Google Scholar
[Defoe, Daniel] (1701a). The Free-holders Plea against Stock-jobbing Elections of Parliament Men. 2nd ed. with additions. London.Google Scholar
[Defoe, Daniel] (1701b), The Villainy of Stock-Jobbers Detected. London.Google Scholar
De Marchi, Neil (1995), “The role of Dutch auctions and lotteries in shaping the art market (s) of 17th century Holland,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28:203–221.Google Scholar
De Marchi, Neil and Van Miegroet, Hans J. (1994), “Art, value, and market practices in the Netherlands in the seventeenth century,”Art Bulletin 76:451–64.Google Scholar
De Marchi, Neil and Van Miegroet, Hans J. (1998), “Novelty and Fashion Circuits in the Mid-Seventeenth-Century Antwerp-Paris Art Trade,” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 28 : 201–46.Google Scholar
De Marchi, Neil and Van Miegroet, Hans J. (1999), “Exploring markets for Netherlandish paintings in Spain and Nueva España,” Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 50 : 81–111.Google Scholar
De Vries, Jan (1976), The Economy of Europe in an Age of Crisis, 1600–1750. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Earle, Peter (1989), The Making of the English Middle Class. Business, Society and Family Life in London, 1660–1730. Berkeley and Los Angeles : Methuen and University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eeghen, I.H. van (1969). “Het Amsterdamse Sint Lucasgilde in de 17de eeuw.” Jaarboek Amstelodamum 61 : 65–102.Google Scholar
Ewing, Dan (1990), “Marketing Art in Antwerp, 1460-1560 : Our Lady’s Pand” Art Bulletin 72 : 558–84.Google Scholar
Fairchilds, Cissie (1993), “The production and marketing of populuxe goods in eighteenth-century Paris,” in John Brewer and Roy Porter (eds), Consumption and the World of Goods. London and New York: Routledge: 228–48.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1983), “Art as a Cultural System,” in Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. New York: Basic Books: 94–120.Google Scholar
Goodman, Dena (1994), The Republic of Letters. A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Joseph E. (1989), “Non-cooperative games,” in The New Palgrave, Game Theory, ed. John, Eatwell, Murray, Milgate and Newman, Peter. New York and London: Norton: 178–84.Google Scholar
Houghton, John (1727–8), Husbandry and Trade Improv’d : being a Collection of many valuable materials relating to Corn, Cattle, Coals, Hops, Wool, …c. 2nd ed., revised by Richard, Bradley. London: Woodman and Lyon.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1993 [1777], “Of Commerce,” in Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, World’s Classics edition, Stephen, Copley and Edgar, Andrew (eds): 154–66.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lynn F. (1998). Early Netherlandish Carved Altarpieces, 1380–1550. Medieval Tastes and Mass Marketing. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kreps, David M. (1989), “Nash Equilibrium,” in The New Palgrave, Game Theory, ed. Eatwell Milgate and Newman: 167–77.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard (1924) [1714–32], The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Edited, with a Commentary by Kaye, F.B., 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAfee, R. Preston and John, McMillan (1992), “Modelling transactions under asymmetric information,” in John, Creedy, Jeff, Borland and Eichberger, Jürgen (eds), Recent Developments in Game Theory. Aldershot: Elgar: 125–40.Google Scholar
McClellan, Andrew (1996), “Watteau’s Dealer: Gersaint and the Marketing of Art in Eighteenth-Century Paris,” Art Bulletin 78: 439–53.Google Scholar
Montias, J. Michael (1982), Artists and Artisans in Delft : A S ocio-Economic Study of the Seventeenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Montias, J. Michael (1987), “Cost and Value in Seventeenth Century Dutch Art,” Art History 10:455–66.Google Scholar
Montias, J. Michael (1999), “Auctions of works of art in seventeenth-century Amsterdam (1597–1638),” Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 50:145–93.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Obreen, F.D.O. (1976 [1880–81]), “Het Sint Lucas Gilde te Amsterdam,” Archief voor Nederlandsche Kunstgeshiedenis. Soest:Davaco, vol. 3: 89–196.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Grant (1990). Ruckers: a harpsichord and virginal building tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Ormrod, David (1998), “The Origins of the London Art Market, 1660–1730” in North and Ormrod (eds.), Art Markets in Europe, 1400–1800: 167–86.Google Scholar
Ormrod, David (1995), “The demise of regulated trading in England : The Case of the Merchant Adventurers, 1650–1730”, in Lesger, C. and Noordegraaf, L. eds, Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneur ship in Early Modern Times. Hollands Historische Reeks, Amsterdam, pp. 253–81.Google Scholar
Pears, Iain (1988), The Discovery of Painting. The Growth of Interest in the Arts in England, 1680–1768. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pomian, Krzysztof (1990), Collectors and Curiosities. Paris and Venice. 1500–1800, Transl. Elizabeth Wiles-Portier. Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, Eric (1989),Games and Information. An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Romein, , Ed (2000), Knollen en citroenen op de Leidse kunstmarkt. Doctoraal Thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Sargentson, Carolyn (1996), Merchants and Luxury Markets. The Marchands Merciers of Eighteenth-Century Paris. London and Malibu: The Victoria and Albert Museum in association with the J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon (1987), The Embarrassment of Riches. An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Schnapper, Antoine (1994), Curieux du Grand Siècle. Collections et collectionneurs dans la France du XVIIè siècle. II-Œuvres d’art. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Schnapper, Antoine (1998), “Probate Inventories, Public Sales and the Parisian Art Market in the Seventeenth Century,” in North and Ormrod (eds.), Art Markets in Europe, 1400–1800:131–41.Google Scholar
Schotter, Andrew (1981), The economic theory of social institutions. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archief Slingelandt, Algemeen Rijksarchief, The Hague, ARA 3.20.52 numbers 410 and 411.Google Scholar
Sluijter, Eric Jan (1999), “Over Brabantse vodden, economische concurrence, artistieke wedijver en de groei van de markt voor schilderijen in de eerste decennia van de zeventiende eeuw,” Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 50: 113–43.Google Scholar
Sosson, J. P. (1970), “Une approche des structures économiques d’un métier d’art : La Corporation des Peintres et Selliers de Bruges (Xve-XVIe siècles),” Revue des archéologues et historiens d’art de Louvain, 3: 91–100.Google Scholar
Sosson, J. P. (1986), “Structures associatives et réalités socio-économiques dans l’artisanat d’art et du bâtiment aux Pays-Bas (XIVe-Xve siècles). Perspectives de recherche,” in Artists, artisans et production artistique au moyen âge. Colloque Internationale, vol. 1. Paris: 111–18.Google Scholar
Stabel, Peter (1999), “Venice and the Low Countries : Commercial Contacts and Intellectual Inspirations,” in Bernard, Aikema and Brown, Beverly Louise (eds), Renaissance Venice and the North. Crosscurrents in the Time of Bellini, Durer and Titian. Exh. Cat.. Milan:Bompiani: 31–43.Google Scholar
Vermeylen, Filip (1998), “Marketing paintings in sixteenth century Antwerp: Demand for art and the role of the panden,” in Stabel, P., Blondé, B. and Greve, A. eds, International Trade in the Low Countries (14th–16th Centuries). Merchants, Organization and Infrastructure. Leuven and Apeldoorn: Garant: 193–213.Google Scholar
Weatherill, Lorna (1993), “The meaning of consumer behavior in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century England,” in John, Brewer and Porter, Roy (eds), Consumption and the World of Goods:206–27.Google Scholar