Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:25:31.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Théorie de la dynamique économique : une réévaluation de la tentative de Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Philippe Dulbecco
Affiliation:
CERDI, UMR N°6587 du CNRS et Université d'Auvergne Clermont
Pierre Garrouste
Affiliation:
ATOM et Université Lumière Lyon
Get access

Résumé

Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen est connu à la fois pour sa contribution essentielle à lanalyse économique traditionnelle et pour sa volonté de fonder une approche bioéconomique. En nous appuyant sur la Méthodologie des Programmes de Recherche Scientifique de Lakatos et sur la réconciliation quil propose entre « histoire interne » et « histoire externe » des sciences, nous tentons de réévaluer la tentative de Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen de fonder un nouveau programme de recherche. Nous concluons en montrant léchec de cette tentative.

Summary

Summary

Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen is well-known, first because he importantly contributes to the so-called standard economics, and second because he undertakes to set up a bioeconomics. The Lakatosian Methodology of Scientific Research Program and his proposal to combine “internal” and “external” history of the growth of scientific knowledge help us to appraise the Nicholas Georgescu-Roegens will to build up a new Scientific Research Program. Our conclusion is a negative one.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Université d'Auvergne Clermont 1, 65 Bd. François Mitterrand, 63000 Clermont Ferrand. E.mail: P.Dulbecco@cerdi.u-clermont1.fr

**

ATOM, 106-112 Bd. de I'Hôpital, 75013 Paris. E.mail: galau@club-internet.fr

References

Bibliographie

Ayres, (1997), “Comments on Georgescu-Roegen”, Ecological Economics, 22, pp.285–7.Google Scholar
Ayres, R.U. (1998), “Eco-thermodynamics : economics and the second law”, Ecological Economics, 26, pp. 189209.Google Scholar
Cleveland, C, Ruth, M. (1997), “When, where, and by how much do biophysical limits constrain the economic process? A survey of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen's contribution to ecological economics”, Ecological Economics, 22, pp.203–23.Google Scholar
Daly, H. (1997), “Introduction”, Ecological Economics, 22, p.173.Google Scholar
Dufourt, D., Garrouste, P. (1993) “Criteria of Scientificity and Methodology of the Social Sciences : Menger, Mises and Hayek”, in Hébert, R. (ed) Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, vol. 9, Hants: Edwerd Elgard.Google Scholar
Ecological Economics (1997), Special Issue “Answering Georgescu-Roegen”, 22.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S. (1996), «La contribution entropique de Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen à l’économie», Paper presented at the International Conference on Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s Scientific Work, Strasbourg, 6-7 November.Google Scholar
Gaffard, J.-L. (1990), Économie industrielle et de l'innovation, Dalloz.Google Scholar
Gaffard, J.-L. (1995), «De la substitution à la complémentarité : propositions pour un réexamen de la théorie de la firme et des marchés», in Économie industrielle : développements récents, Numéro Exceptionnel de la Revue d’économie industrielle, pp.305–16.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1951a), “The Aggregate Linear Production Function and Its Applications to von Neumann’s Economic Model”, in Koopmans, T.C. (ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, pp.98115, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., second printing 1956.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1951b), “Relaxation Phenomena in Linear Dynamic Models”, in Koopmans, T.C. (ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, pp.116–31, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., second printing 1956.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1951c), “Some Properties of a Generalized Leontief Model”, in Koopmans, T.C. (ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, pp.165–73, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., second printing 1956.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1970), La science économique — ses problèmes et ses difficultés —, Dunod, traduction partielle de : Analytical Economies : Issues and Problems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971), The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1976), Energy and Economic Myths, Institutional and Analytical Economic Essays, Pergamon.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1977), “Inequality, limits and growth from a bioe-conomic viewpoint”, Review of Social Economy, 56, pp. 361–75.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1978), «De la science économique à la bioéconomie», Revue d’Économie Politique, n°3, mai-juin, pp.337–81.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1979), “Methods in Economie Science”, Journal of Economie Issues, Vol. 13, n°2, june, pp.317–28.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1987), “Ophelimity”, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economies, Macmillan, vol.3, pp. 716–17.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1988a), “An Emigrant from a Developing Country : Autobiographical Notes”, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, no. 164, March, pp.331.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1988b), “Time and Change in Economics”, in Seifert, E.K. (ed.), Ökonomie und Zeit, pp.2952,Haag+Herchen Verlag, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1992a), “Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen about Himself”, in Szenberg, M. (ed.), Eminent Economists, Their Life Philosophies, pp.128–59, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1992b), “Nicholas Georgecu-Roegen”, in Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (eds.), A Biographical Dictionary of Dissenting Economists, pp. 179–87, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gossen, H.H. (1983), The Laws of Human Relations and the Rules of Human Action Derived Therefrom, (Trans. Blitz, R.), MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gowdy, J., Mayumi, K. (1998), Georgescu-Roegen’s Consumer Choice Theory and its Relevance to Sustainability Issues, Paper presented at the International Conference on Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s Scientific Work, Strasbourg, 6–7 November.Google Scholar
Gowdy, J., Mesner, (1998), “The evolution of Georgescu-Roegen’s bioeconocmics”, Review of Social Economy, 56, pp. 136–56.Google Scholar
Gowdy, J., O’Hara, S.(1997), “Weak sustainability and viable technologies”, Ecological Economics, 22, pp.239–47.Google Scholar
Grinevald, J. (1996), Prçface pour l’çdition espagnole de The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Fundación Argentaria/Visor, Madrid.Google Scholar
Grinevald, J., Rens, I. (1995) Introduction, in Georgescu-Roegen, N., La décroissance, Éditions Sang de la terre.Google Scholar
Lachmann, L. (1977), Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process, Essays on the Theory of the Market Economy, edited with an introduction by Walter, E.Grinder, Sheeed, Andrews and McMeel, , Kansas City.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1983) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Philosophical papers, vol.1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. (1997), “Substitution and sustainability : some reflections on Georgescu-Roegen”, Ecological Economics, 22, pp.295–97.Google Scholar
Perrings, C. (1997), “Georgescu-Roegen and the ‘irreversibility’ of material processes”, Ecological Economics, 22, pp.303–4.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. (1998), Georgescu-Roegen’s Impact on Ecological Economics, Paper presented at the International Conference on Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s Scientific Work, Strasbourg, 6–7 November.Google Scholar
Seifert, E.K. (1994), “Georgescu Roegen, Nicholas”, in Hodgson, G.M., Samuels, W.J., Tool, M.R. (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, pp.277–83.Google Scholar
Serres, M., Farouki, N. (eds.) (1997), Le Trésor, Dictionnaire des Sciences, Flammarion.Google Scholar
Setterfield, M. (1995), “Historical Time and Economie Theory”, Review of Political Economy, 7.1.Google Scholar
Söllner, F. (1997), “A reexamination of the rôle of thermodynamics for environmental economics”, Ecological Economics, 22, pp.175201.Google Scholar
Witt, U. (1998), “The Insatiable Consumer - The Structure and Dynamics of Wants Reconsidered”, Paper presented at the International Conference on Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s Scientific Work, Strasbourg, 6–7 November.Google Scholar
Zamagni, S. (1987), Microeconomic Theory : an Introduction, Basil Black-well.Google Scholar