Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:32:42.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vertical integration, technological choice and foreclosure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Eric Avenel*
Affiliation:
EUREQua, Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
Get access

Summary

The foreclosure of downstream firms is a major feature in the study of the strategic aspects of vertical integration. The main issue is that, however profitable it may seem for integrated firms to adopt this rising rivals’ costs strategy, foreclosure fails to appear in most models, unless integrated firms are assumed to be able to commit on this strategy. We propose a model based on the idea that foreclosure results from a technological choice. This approach allows us to find equilibrium vertical foreclosure without supposing any commitment capability to integrated firms. Foreclosure results from the adoption a technology that doesn’t rely on the (standard) intermediate good traded on the market, but on a different good, not compatible with the standard technology. The possibility of a (costly) adaptation of a nonstandard good to the standard technology is explicitly taken into account in the model.

Résumé

Résumé

La forclusion des firmes aval est au centre de l’étude des aspects stratégiques de l’intégration verticale. Force est de constater que cette stratégie d’élévation des coûts des concurrents, a priori intéressante pour les firmes intégrées, n’apparaît dans les modèles existants qu’en attribuant aux firmes intégrées la capacité de s’engager sur cette stratégie. Nous proposons un modèle fondé sur l’idée que la forclusion résulte d’un choix terminologique, en l’occurence de l’adoption d’une terminologie qui ne repose pas sur le bien intermédiaire standard échangé sur le marché, mais sur un autre bien intermédiaire, incompatible avec la technologie standard. La forclusion verticale apparaît alors à l’équilibre sans attribuer une capacité d’engagement particulière aux firmes intégrées. Le modèle prend en compte la possiblilite d’une adaptation (coûteuse) d’un bien non-standard à la technologie standard

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to D. Encaoua, A. Perrot, P. Rey, J.-R Ponssard, C. Barlet and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper.

**

Maison des Sciences Economiques, 106–112, Boulevard de l’hôpital, 75647 Paris Cedex 13. France, e-mail: avenel@univ-paris1.fr

References

Avenel, E., (1996), “Vertical vs. horizontal integration and pre-emptive merging: a comment”, Cahiers Eco & Maths 96–53, Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Colangelo, G., (1995), “Vertical vs. horizontal integration : pre-emptive merging”, The Journal of Industrial Organization, XLIII, n° 3, pp. 323337.Google Scholar
Gaudet, G. and Van Long, N., (1996), “Vertical integration, foreclosure and profits in the presence of double marginalization”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 5, n° 3, pp. 409432.Google Scholar
Hart, O. and Tirole, J., (1990), “Vertical integration and market foreclosure, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity : Microeconomics, pp. 205276.Google Scholar
High Court of Australia, (1989), “Queensland Wire Industries Proprietary Limited v. The Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited and another”. 167 CLR 177 F.C. 89/004.Google Scholar
Ordover, J.A., Saloner, G. and Salop, S.C., (1990), “Equilibrium vertical foreclosure”, American Economic Review, 80, pp. 127142.Google Scholar
Reiffen, D., (1992), “Equilibrium vertical foreclosure : comment”, American Economic Review, 82, pp. 694697.Google Scholar
Salinger, M.A., (1988), “Vertical mergers and market foreclosure”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, pp. 345356.Google Scholar
Schader, A., (1994), “Vertical mergers and market foreclosure : comment”. Working Paper ECO n° 94/24, EUI. Florence, Italy.Google Scholar