Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:53:06.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divine command theory and psychopathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2018

ERIK J. WIELENBERG
ERIK J. WIELENBERG*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, DePauw University, Greencastle, Indiana46135, USA
*
e-mail: ewielenberg@depauw.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I advance a novel challenge for Divine Command Theory based on the existence of psychopaths. The challenge, in a nutshell, is that Divine Command Theory has the implausible implication that psychopaths have no moral obligations and hence their evil acts, no matter how evil, are morally permissible. After explaining this argument, I respond to three objections to it and then critically examine the prospect that Divine Command Theorists might bite the bullet and accept that psychopaths can do no wrong. I conclude that the Psychopathy Objection constitutes a serious and novel challenge for Divine Command Theory.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 542 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Marilyn (1999) Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn (2008) ‘Plantinga on “felix culpa”: analysis and critique’, Faith and Philosophy 25, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert (1999) Finite and Infinite Goods (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Adshead, Gwen (2014) ‘The words but not the music: empathy, language deficits, and psychopathy’, in Schramme, T. (ed.) Being Amoral: Psychopathy and Moral Incapacity (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggett, David (2011). ‘On psychopathy and moral apologetics’, <http://moralapologetics.com/on-psychopathy-and-moral-apologetics>..>Google Scholar
Baggett, David, & Walls, Jerry L. (2011) Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, William Lane (2008) Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd edn (Wheaton IL: Crossway).Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane (2009) ‘This most gruesome of guests’, in Garcia, R. K. & King, N. L. (eds) Is Goodness without God Good Enough? A Debate on Faith, Secularism, and Ethics (Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 167–188.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen (2013) God and Moral Obligation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannagan, Matthew (2017) ‘Robust ethics and the autonomy thesis: a reply to Erik Wielenberg’, Philosophia Christi, 19, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, John (2001) God's Call: Moral Realism, God's Commands, and Human Autonomy (Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans).Google Scholar
Hare, John (2015) God's Command (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, Robert D. (1999) Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths among Us (New York NY: Guilford Press).Google Scholar
Hare, Robert D., & Neumann, Craig S. (2010) ‘Psychopathy: assessment and forensic implications’, in Malatesti, L. & McMillan, J. (eds), Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry, and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 93–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, Jeanette, & Fine, Cordelia (2008) ‘Internalism and the evidence from psychopaths and “acquired psychopaths” ’, in Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.) Moral Psychology, III: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), 173–190.Google Scholar
Kiehl, Kent A. (2014) The Psychopath Whisperer: The Science of Those without Conscience (New York NY: Broadway Books).Google Scholar
Malatesti, Luca, & McMillan, John (2010) Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Eric (2014) ‘Psychopathy and moral rationality’, in Schramme, T. (ed.) Being Amoral: Psychopathy and Moral Incapacity (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morriston, Wes (2009) ‘The moral obligations of reasonable non-believers: a special problem for divine command metaethics’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 65, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. (2008) ‘Psychopathy and criminal responsibility’, Neuroethics, 1, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. (2010) ‘Psychopathy and the law: the United States experience’, in Malatesti, L. & McMillan, J. (eds) Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry, and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark (2014) ‘Theological voluntarism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/voluntarism-theological/>..>Google Scholar
Ramirez, Erick (2013) ‘Psychopathy, moral reasons, and responsibility’, in Herron, C. D. & Perry, A. (eds) Ethics and Neurodiversity (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), 217–237.Google Scholar
Schramme, Thomas (2014) ‘Being a (a-)moral person and caring about morality’, in Schramme, T. (ed.) Being Amoral: Psychopathy and Moral Incapacity (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, Martha (2005) The Sociopath Next Door (New York NY: Broadway Books).Google Scholar
Viding, Essi, & McCrory, Eamon J. (2018) ‘Understanding the development of psychopathy: progress and challenges’, Psychological Medicine, 48, 566–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vujosevic, Marijana (2014) ‘Conscience as the rational deficit of psychopaths’, Philosophical Psychology, 28, 1219–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, William (2005) Religion and Morality (Burlington VT: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Wielenberg, Erik J. (2005) Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wielenberg, Erik J. (2008) God and the Reach of Reason: C. S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wielenberg, Erik J. (2014) Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar