Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T02:33:58.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divine Contradiction: replies to critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2024

Jc Beall Open the ORCID record for Jc Beall [Opens in a new window]
Jc Beall*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
*
Email: jbeall@nd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is a collection of replies to critics of Divine Contradiction, each critic a symposiast in the Religious Studies symposium on said book.

Keywords

trinitylogical problemcontradictory theologyglutsparadox
Type
Book Symposium
Information
Religious Studies , First View , pp. 1 - 19
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beall, J (2023) Divine Contradiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, J and Middleton, B (2024) Truth: The Basics. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kilby, K (2024) Divine contradiction: fascinating but unpersuasive. Religious Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412524000271.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P (2024) Truth and falsity. Religious Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Z (2021) Paradoxes and Inconsistent Mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar