No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Blanshard's Ethics of Belief and Metaphysical Postulates
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Extract
In Brand Blanshard's major defence of reason in religion, Reason and Belief, he criticizes both Roman Catholics and Protestants for advocating contradictory theological doctrines and for believing beyond what the evidence supports. Claiming belief to be an ethical matter, with one morally responsible for one's religious beliefs, he holds that one is morally obligated in such metaphysical matters to believe only what the evidence warrants. Blanshard finds that religious beliefs typically fail to meet the standard of this ethics of belief, and thus his ethics appears inhospitable to religious belief.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991
References
1 Blanshard, Brand, Reason and Belief (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1974), pp. 37–56.Google Scholar
2 Ibid. pp. 59–79.
3 Ibid. pp. 80–106.
4 Ibid. pp. 150–9.
5 Ibid. pp. 160–6.
6 Ibid. pp. 197–242, 265–77, 300–3.
7 Ibid. p. 401.
8 Ibid. p. 402.
9 Ibid. pp. 402–3.
10 Ibid. pp. 405–7.
11 Ibid. pp. 410–11, 427.
12 Ibid. pp. 432–3.
13 Ibid. p. 564.
14 Blanshard, Brand, The Nature of Thought (New York: Macmillan, 1940), 151–2.Google Scholar
15 Ibid. 167–74, 225.
16 Ibid. 1530–7.
17 Ibid. 1473.
18 Ibid. 1486–90.
19 Ibid. II 23–4.
20 Ibid. I 490–I.
21 Blanshard, , Reason and Belief, pp. 481–I;Google ScholarThe Nature of Thought, II 422–3.Google Scholar
22 Reason and Belief, pp. 482–3.Google Scholar
23 Blanshard, , Reason and Analysis (La Salle: Open Court, 1962), pp. 472–93.Google Scholar
24 The Nature of Thought, II 495–6;Google ScholarReason and Analysis, pp. 454–5Google Scholar
25 Reason and Analysis, pp. 465–71.Google Scholar
26 Ibid. p. 471.
27 The Nature of Thought, II, 476–95.Google Scholar
28 Schilpp, Paul Arthur, ed., The Philosophy of Brand Blanshard (La Salle: Open court, 1980), p. 592.Google Scholar
29 The Nature of Thought, I pp. 491–3.Google Scholar
30 Schilpp, , pp. 640–1, 833–4.Google Scholar
31 Reason and Belief, p. 503.Google Scholar
32 Ibid. pp. 504–5.
33 Ibid. pp. 505–6.
34 Schilpp, , pp. 512–14.Google Scholar
35 Ibid. p. 623.
36 Ibid. pp. 512–14.
37 Reason and Belief, pp. 508–10.Google Scholar
38 The Nature of Thought, II, 264–6.Google Scholar
39 Schilpp, , pp. 590–4.Google Scholar
40 Ibid. pp. 515–16.
41 Ibid. p. 594.
42 Ibid. p. 622.
43 Ibid. p. 621.
44 Ibid. pp. 623–4.
45 Ibid. pp. 620–21.
46 Reason and Belief, pp. 432–3.Google Scholar
47 Blanshard, , ‘Rationalism in ethics and religion’, in Bertocci, Peter A. (ed.), Mid-Twentieth Century American Philosophy (New York: Humanities Press, 1974), p. 25.Google Scholar
48 Schilpp, , p. 933.Google Scholar
49 The Nature of Thought, II, 269.Google Scholar
50 Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Beck, Lewis White (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956), pp. 129–30.Google Scholar
51 Ibid. p. 130.
52 Ibid., footnote on p. 149.
53 Ibid. pp. 4–5.