No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
In the present philosophical climate of opinion many are inclined to respond to this question in the spirit of the cynical comment concerning Christian Science, that it is neither Christian nor scientific. So it might be affirmed of Christian philosophy. It is neither Christian nor philosophical. It is customary these days to find both theologians and positivistic philosophers agreeing on this point. Theologians of a certain persuasion wish to keep theology free from any taint of the bacillus metaphysicus. Philosophers of a certain school are equally anxious to keep philosophy free of any entanglement with theological questions which involve problems incapable of linguistic clarification and precise meaning. Nevertheless, there is mounting evidence that this kind of intellectual apartheid is becoming less and less possible in practice and less attractive in principle. Even those who wish to separate rigidly theology and philosophy seem in practice to find it impossible to let each other alone. Each exercises a kind of morbid fascination for the other, and even if real dialogue is refused, the sniping still goes on, in reluctant acknowledgement of the existence of the other. The time would appear to be ripe, therefore, for a fresh and bold re-opening of the question which forms the title of this paper.
page 233 note 1 Nédoncelle, M., Is there a Christian Philosophy? pp. 85 ff.Google Scholar
Sciacca, M. F., Le Problème de Dieu et de la Religion dans la Philosophie Contemporaine pp. 119 ff.Google Scholar
page 234 note 1 Bréhier, Emile, Histoire de la Philosophie II, viii, p. 487.Google Scholar
page 234 note 2 Gilson, Etienne, The Spirit of Mediaeval Philosophy p. 51.Google Scholar
page 236 note 1 M. Blondel, The Letter on Apologetics and History and Dogma, translated by Alexander Dru and Illtyd Trethowan, p. 185.
page 236 note 2 Bouillard, Henry, Blondel et le Christianisme p. 35.Google Scholar
page 236 note 3 Blondel, op. cit. p. 191.
page 236 note 4 Mehl, R., The Condition of the Christian Philosophy p. 15.Google Scholar
page 237 note 1 Mehl, R., The Condition of the Christian Philosophy p. 23.Google Scholar
page 237 note 2 Ibid. p. 26.
page 237 note 3 Gilson, E., The Spirit of Mediaeval Philosophy p. 5.Google Scholar
page 237 note 4 Mehl, op. cit. p. 31.
page 237 note 5 Mehl, op. cit. p. 94.
page 237 note 6 Smith, John E., Reason and God p. 141.Google Scholar
page 237 note 7 Smith, op. cit. p. 152.
page 237 note 8 Smith, op. cit. p. 153.
page 238 note 1 J. B. Cobb (Jr.), Christian Natural Theology.
page 238 note 2 E. L. Mascall, He Who is. Cf. his criticism of these two philosophers in chapters xi and xii.
page 238 note 3 H. D. Lewis, Our Experience of God, p. 46.
page 238 note 4 Ramsey, I. T., Religious Language p. 74.Google Scholar
page 239 note 1 Tresmontant, C., La Métaphysique du Christianisme p. 42.Google Scholar
page 239 note 2 Smith, op. cit. p. 144.
page 240 note 1 Ramsey, Ian, Prospect for Metaphysics pp. 95–6.Google Scholar
page 241 note 1 Christian, W. A., Meaning and Truth in Religion p. 240.Google Scholar
page 242 note 1 W. A. Christian op. cit. p. 260.