No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
We have been so much preoccupied with the concept of God lately – Ogden has suggested that it is the central problem in theology – that it is something of a jolt to realize that the doctrine of the incarnation has come suddenly under the sharpest attack from two very different theological directions. There is, coming from one side, the critique of the English theologians in the recently published The Myth of God Incarnate; and then, with a very different kind of agenda, there is the critique of the radical feminist theologians summarily and forcefully stated in the christological chapter of Mary Daly's Beyond God the Father.
page 179 note 1 Ogden, Schubert, The Reality of God (New York: Harper & Row, 1966), p. 1Google Scholar
page 179 note 2 Hick, John, ed., The Myth of God Incarnate (London: SCM Press, 1977Google Scholar). (Hereafter abbreviated MGI.)
page 179 note 3 Daly, Mary, Beyond God the Father (Boston: Beacon Press, 1973).Google Scholar
page 181 note 1 Whitehead, Alfred North, Process and Reality (New York: Macmillan, 1929), p. 4.Google Scholar
page 182 note 1 ‘Two Roots or a Tangled Mass?’ (in MGI), p. 114.
page 184 note 1 ‘Christianity without Incarnation?’ (in MGI), p. 1.
page 184 note 2 ‘Jesus and the World Religions’ (in MGI), p. 174.
page 184 note 3 ‘The Christ of Christendom’ (in MGI), pp. 134, 137, 140.
page 184 note 4 ‘Two Roots or a Tangled Mass?’ (in MGI), p. 118.
page 185 note 1 ‘The Christ of Christendom’ (in MGI), p. 134.
page 186 note 1 Ibid. p. 145.
page 186 note 2 Op. cit. p. 5.Google Scholar
page 187 note 1 Ibid. p. 7.
page 187 note 2 Ibid. pp. 7–9.
page 187 note 3 Ibid. p. 9.
page 189 note 1 Williams, Daniel Day, The Spirit and the Forms of Love (New York: Harper & Row, 1968), p. 163.Google Scholar
page 189 note 2 Op. cit. p. 144.Google Scholar
page 190 note 1 Beyond God the Father, pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
page 190 note 2 Ibid. p. 71.
page 191 note 1 Ibid. p. 79.