No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
It is a curious fact that the much maligned ontological argument to prove the existence of God has in recent times enjoyed a revival of interest to which even Karl Barth, the arch-enemy of natural theology has contributed; but since the revival of interest has appared in a wide diversity of intellectual contexts, both philosophical and theological, the revival is itself almost as problematic as the argument itself.
page 319 note 1 Flew, A. and MacIntyre, A. (ed.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (S.C.M. Press, London, 1955), p. 52.Google Scholar
page 320 note 1 Flew, A. and MacIntyre, A. (ed.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (S.C.M. Press, London, 1955), P. 55.Google Scholar
page 320 note 2 Ibid., p. 60.
page 320 note 3 Caldecott, A. and Mackintosh, H. R., Selections from the Literature of Theism (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1904), p. 4.Google Scholar
page 321 note 1 Malcolm, N., ‘Anselm's Ontological Arguments’, Philosophical Review, 01, 1960, p. 48.Google Scholar
page 321 note 2 Ibid., p. 50.
page 322 note 1 Malcolm, N., ‘Anselm's Ontological Arguments’, Philosophical Review, 01, 1960, pp. 61 f.Google Scholar
page 322 note 2 Phillips, D. Z., The Concept of Prayer (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1965), p. 19.Google Scholar
page 322 note 3 Cf. ibid., pp. 24, 27, 28.
page 323 note 1 Findlay, J. N., The Transcendence of the Cave (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1967), p. 89.Google Scholar
page 323 note 2 Ibid., p. 81.
page 323 note 3 Ibid., p. 86.
page 323 note 4 Ibid., p. 80.
page 323 note 5 Ibid., p. 81.
page 323 note 6 Ibid., p. 79.
page 324 note 1 Barth, K., Church Dogmatics, II, 1 (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1957), pp. 304 f.Google Scholar
page 324 note 2 Ibid., II, 1, pp. 92 f.
page 326 note 1 Mascall, E. L., Existence and Analogy (Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1949), p. 80.Google Scholar
page 326 note 2 Ibid., p. 51.
page 326 note 3 Ibid., pp. 50 f.
page 326 note 4 Ibid., p. 80.
page 326 note 5 In New Essays in Philosophical Theology, p. 54.Google Scholar
page 327 note 1 Existence and Analogy, p. 71.Google Scholar
page 327 note 2 Ibid., p. 71.
page 327 note 3 Lewis, H. D., Our Religious Experience (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1959), p. 65.Google Scholar
page 327 note 4 Ibid., P. 42.
page 327 note 5 Ibid., p. 41.
page 327 note 6 Quoted ibid., P. 43.
page 329 note 1 ‘The Problem of Natural Theology in the Thought of Karl Barth’, Religious Studies, 6, p. 125.Google Scholar
page 329 note 2 Ibid., p. 129.
page 330 note 1 Cf. ‘The Problem of Natural Theology in the Thought of Karl Barth’, Religious Studies, 6, p. 133 f.Google Scholar
page 330 note 2 Ibid., p. 133.
page 330 note 2 The Transcendence of the Cave, p. 86.Google Scholar