Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:16:23.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selves and Minds: A Reply to Professor Knox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Mark B. Woodhouse
Mark B. Woodhouse
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Philosophy, State College of Arkansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Reply To
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 1970 , pp. 263 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 263 note 1 Knox, John Jr., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. pp. 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 263 note 2 ibid.

page 264 note 1 Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 264 note 2 ibid., p. 90.

page 265 note 1 Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 267 note 1 Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 267 note 2 ibid.

page 267 note 3 ibid.

page 267 note 4 ibid.

page 269 note 1 Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar More specifically, Knox suggests that the above condition is a necessary assumption of his thesis that the application of criteria of personal identity is irrelevant to one's own ultimate distinctness. Since I believe his attempt to base the intelligibility of the distinction between a self and its mind upon this thesis involves essentially the same errors as I pointed out in the first section, I shall not comment upon his arguments in support of that thesis.

page 270 note 1 Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 271 note 1 Knox, John Jr., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 272 note 1 Knox, John Jr., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar