Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:04:30.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temporal Wholes and the Problem of Evil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Mark T. Nelson
Mark T. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, Virginia 23943
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article is not intended to state what I positively believe to be true, but to make a suggestion which I think it well-worth working out. The suggestion is not altogether unfamiliar, but it has certain implications that seem to have been so far overlooked, or at any rate have never been developed. I do not think that it is the duty of a philosopher to confine himself in his publications to working out theories of the truth of which he is convinced.… It is a part of a philosopher's work, as it is of a scientist's, to try out tentative hypotheses and examine their advantages and disadvantages (Ewing 1939, p. 1).

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 313 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Augustine. On Free Will.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1976). Of Grammatology (trans. Spivak, Gayatri). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1939). A suggested non-naturalistic analysis of good. Mind, XLVII, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, Stuart C. (1979). Oriental Philosophy: A Westerner's Guide to Eastern Thought. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Hick, John (1966). Evil and the God of Love. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Hick, John (1990). Philosophy of Religion, 4th ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1947). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, edited, with an introduction, by Norman, Kemp Smith. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.Theodicy.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1946). The Great Divorce. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Madden, E. H. and Hare, Peter H. (1968). Evil and the Concept of God. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974). God, Freedom, and Evil. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Rowe, William (1978). Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Scaltsas, Theodore (1990). Is a whole identical to its parts? Mind, XCIX, 583–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sophocles, (1978). Oedipus the King. Trans. Berg, S. and Clay, D.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stoppard, Tom (1967). Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1979). The Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar