Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:34:36.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Civil Disobedience and international society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2016

Ronnie Hjorth
Ronnie Hjorth*
Affiliation:
Professor of Political Science, Swedish Defence University
*
*Correspondence to: Ronnie Hjorth, Swedish Defence University, Drottning Kristinas väg 37, Box 27805, 115 19 Stockholm, Sweden. Author’s email: ronnie.hjorth@fhs.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the concept of State Civil Disobedience (SCD) in the context of international society. It is argued that SCD is problematic for several reasons. First, that SCD is extremely difficult to practice in an association such as international society, relying, as it does, a great deal on the policies and powers of a few dominating actors; second, that the unequal status of states makes SCD mainly an instrument of the strong, hence undermining not only the idea of civil disobedience as the strategy of the weak but also questioning the role of SCD within an international society based on the formal equality of states. It is concluded that the practice of SCD in international society requires an invigoration of international society as a moral association. A more practical alternative, it is argued, is to conceive of a limited concept of SCD confined largely to non-violent means and preferably practiced in order to resist legal anomalies.

Keywords

State Civil DisobedienceInternational SocietyThe English SchoolInternational Political TheoryNormative International Relations Theory
Type
Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 330 - 344
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Franceschet, Antonio, ‘Theorizing State Civil Disobedience in international politics’, Journal of International Political Theory, 11:2 (2015), pp. 239–256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan, 1977), p. 13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Kirkpatrick, Jennet, Uncivil Disobedience: Studies in Violence and Democratic Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Security, solidarity and sovereignty: the grand themes of UN reform’, The American Journal of International Law, 74 (2005), pp. 2961–2970 Google Scholar; Morris, Justin, ‘Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum’, International Affairs, 89:5 (2013), pp. 1265–1283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; UN General Assembly A/68/262 (27 March 2014).

5 Txanakopoulos, Antonios, Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

7 Huysmans, Jef, ‘Minding exceptions: the politics of insecurity and liberal democracy’, Contemporary Political Theory, 3:3 (2004), pp. 321–341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Van Munster, Rens, ‘The war on terrorism: When the exception becomes the rule’, International Journal of Semiotics and Law, 17 (2004), pp. 141–153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Bull, Anarchical Society, p. 8; Whelan, Fredrick G., ‘Legal positivism and international society’, in David R. Mapel and Terry Nardin (eds), International Society: Diverse Ethical Approaches (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998), p. 43 Google Scholar.

9 Hjorth, Ronnie, ‘Hedley Bull’s paradox of the balance of power: a philosophical inquiry’, Review of International Studies, 33 (2007), pp. 597–613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hjorth, Ronnie, ‘The poverty of exceptionalism in international theory’, Journal of International Political Theory, 10:2 (2014a), pp. 169–187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘International crisis of legitimacy’, International Politics, 44 (2007), pp. 157–174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Goodin, Robert, ‘Toward an international rule of law: Distinguishing international law-breakers from would-be law-makers’, The Journal of Ethics, 9:1/2 (2005), pp. 225–246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Hoag, Robert W., ‘Violent civil disobedience: Defending human rights, rethinking Just War’, in M. W. Brough, J. W. Lango, and H. van der Linden (eds), Rethinking the Just War Tradition (Albany, NY: State University of New York, 2007)Google Scholar.

13 Buchanan, Allen, ‘From Nuremburg to Kosovo: the morality of illegal international legal reform’, Ethics, 111:4 (2001), pp. 673–705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 687).

14 Ibid., p. 688.

15 Franceshet, ‘Theorizing State Civil Disobedience’, p. 252.

16 Ibid., p. 240.

17 Agamben, Giorgio, ‘What is a destituent power?’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32 (2014), pp. 65–74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 70).

18 Claude, Inis, Power and International Relations (New York: Random House, 1962)Google Scholar; Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar.

19 Bull, Anarchical Society, p. 108.

20 Agamben, ‘What is a destituent power?’, p. 1.

21 Vincent, R. J., ‘Western conceptions of a universal moral order’, British Journal of International Studies, 4 (1978), pp. 20–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 45).

22 Tuck, Richard, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Boucher, David, The Limits of Ethics in International Relations: Natural Law, Natural Rights and Human Rights in Transition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Linklater, Andrew, The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (London: Polity Press, 1998)Google Scholar.

23 Frost, Mervyn, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Vincent, R. J., Human Rights and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Wheeler, Nicholas, Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

25 Bull, Hedley, ‘The Grotian conception of international society’, in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight (eds), Diplomatic Investigations (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1966), p. 52 Google Scholar; Mayall, James, World Politics: Progress and its Limits (London: Polity Press, 2000), p. 14 Google Scholar.

26 Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972), p. 374 Google Scholar.

27 Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979), p. 271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘Sovereignty and equality’, in A. Hurell and N. Woods (eds), Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Hjorth, Ronnie, Equality in International Society: A Reappraisal (Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Keene, Edward, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Simpson, Gerry, Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clark, Ian, Hegemony in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Ringmar, Erik, Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Neumann, Iver B. and de Carvalho, Benjamin (eds), Small State Status Seeking: Norway’s Quest for International Standing (London: Routledge, 2015)Google Scholar.

31 Paul, T.V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C. (eds), Status in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), p. 7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Paul, Welch Larson, and Wohlforth, Status in World Politics, p. 7.

33 Neuman and Carvalho, Small States Status Seeking, p. 10.

34 Wight, Martin, Power Politics (London: Leicester University Press, 1978)Google Scholar.

35 Paul, Welch Larson, and Wohlforth, Status in World Politics, p.14.

36 Linklater, Andrew, ‘Grand narratives and International Relations’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 21:1 (2009), pp. 3–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Miskimmon, Alister, O’Loughlin, Ben, and Roselle, Laura, Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order (London: Routledge, 2013), p. 2 Google Scholar.

38 Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1967)Google Scholar.

39 Morris, ‘Libya and Syria’.

40 Souter, James, ‘Towards a theory of asylum as reparation for past injustice’, Political Studies, 62:2 (2014), pp. 326–342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Allison, Graham and Simes, Dimitri K., ‘Russia and America: Stumbling to war’, The National Interest (April 2015)Google Scholar.

42 Tzanakopoulos, Disobeying the Security Council, p. xxxvi.

43 Neumann and de Carvalho, Small States Status Seeking, pp. 10-11.

44 Jackson, Robert, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

45 Hjorth, ‘Hedley Bull’s paradox’, p. 609.

46 Fukuyama, Francis, Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2014)Google Scholar.

47 Boucher, The Limits of Ethics in International Relations; Osiander, Andreas, ‘Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth’, International Organization, 55 (2001), pp. 251–287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Linklater, Andrew, The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clark, Ian, The Vulnerable in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Bull, Anarchical Society, pp. 16 and 316–17.

50 Hjorth, Equality in International Society, pp. 125–33.

51 Singer, Peter, Practical Ethics (3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), p. 20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Wilson, Peter, ‘The English School’s approach to international law’, in Cornelia Navari (ed.), Theorising International Society: English School Methods (Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), p. 173 Google Scholar; Bull, Anarchical Society, p. 139.

53 Brennan, Geoffrey, Eriksson, Lina, Goodin, Robert E., and Southwood, Nicholas, Explaining Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Buchanan, ‘From Nuremburg to Kosovo’, pp. 678 and 698.