Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:10:31.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating Western Modernism in Postcolonial Arabic Literature: A Study of Abdul-Wahhab Al-Bayati’s Poetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Saddik Gohar
Saddik Gohar*
Affiliation:
United Arab Emirates University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Discussing the banning of Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses in some Islamic countries, Vijay Mishra and Bob Hodge argue:

For the Islamic postcolonial world, the moral is clear and succinct: to write in the language of the colonizer is to write from within death itself. Postcolonial writers who write in the language of the Empire are marked off as traitors to the cause of a reconstructive post-colonialism. Postcolonial writers compose under the shadow of death (Williams & Chrisman 1993:277).

Apparently, the consequences triggered by the publication of Rushdie’s novel, in the preceding century, raised many significant questions about the relationship between East and West, colonized and colonizer. Nevertheless, the hostility toward the book in some Middle Eastern and Islamic countries is not related to the issue of language, identified by Mishra and Hodge as “the language of the empire.” The use of colonial languages rarely represents a threat to Islamic culture because unlike the literature of ex-colonies in Asia, Africa, South America, the West Indies and the Caribbean, dominantly written in the language of the western colonizers, literature in a large part of the Arab-Islamic world is composed in indigenous languages. It is important to point out therefore that the issue of language, raised above, is irrelevant because the campaign against Satanic Verses is rooted in the radical constructs of religious hegemony integral to contemporary political Islamic doctrines.

Type
Essays
Information
Review of Middle East Studies , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , Winter 2007 , pp. 125 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ahmad, Aijaz. 1992. In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Aijaz. 1997. “The Politics of Literary Postcoloniality,” in Contemporary Postcolonial Theory, ed. Mongia, Padmini. London: Reader, pp. 276–293.Google Scholar
Al-Bayati, Abdul Wahhab. 1972. Diwan Al-Bayati/Complete Poetic Works. Beirut: Dar Al-Awda.Google Scholar
Al-Bayati, Abdul Wahhab. 1981. “The Contemporary Arab Poet and Tradition.” Fusul 1/4: 19–22.Google Scholar
Al-Bayati, Abdul Wahhab. 1990. Nosus Sharkiyya/Oriental Texts. Damascus: Al-Mada.Google Scholar
Al-Musawi, Muhsin Jassim. 2002. “Engaging Tradition in Modern Arabic Poetics.” Journal of Arabic Literature XXX III: 172–210.Google Scholar
Badawi, M. M. 1975. A Critical Introduction to Modern Arabic Poetry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Houston A. 1987. Modernism and the Harlem Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davey, Frank. 1998. Reading Canadian Reading. Winnipeg: Turnstone.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Terri. 2000. “T.S. Eliot and Modern Arabic Literature.” The Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature: 3–21.Google Scholar
Dirlik, Arif. 1997. “The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism,” in Contemporary Post-colonial Theory, ed. Mongia, Padmini. London: Reader, pp. 294–319.Google Scholar
During, Simon. 1995. “Postmodernism or Post-Colonialism Today,” in The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, ed. Aschroft, Bill, Griffiths, Gareth and Tiffin, Helen. New York: Routledge, pp. 125–192.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. 1948. Christianity and Culture. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. 1984. “The Waste Land,” in The Oxford Book of Twentieth-Century English Verse, ed. Larkin, Philip. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 234–246.Google Scholar
Gikardi, Simon. 1992. Writing in Limbo: Modernism and Caribbean Literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gohar, Saddik. 2000. Navigating the Post-Colonial: A Study of Contemporary Poetics. Cairo: Eyes.Google Scholar
Gugelburger, George. 1991. “Decolonization of the Canon: Consideration of Third World Literature.” New Literary History 22: 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khouri, M and Algar, H., tr. & ed. 1974. An Anthology of Modern Arabic Poetry. Berkeley University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, David, ed. 1972. Twentieth Century Criticism. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Olson, Gary and Worsham, Lynn. 1999. “Staging the Politics of Difference: Homi Bhabha’s Critical Literacy,” in Race, Rhetoric and the Postcolonial, ed. Olson, Gary and Worsham, Lynn. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 3–39.Google Scholar
Slemon, Stephen. 1989. “Modernism’s Last Post.” Ariel 20: 3–17.Google Scholar
Williams, Patrick and Chrisman, Laura, ed. 1993. Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory: A Reader. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar