Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:05:31.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

World Economic Growth and the Soviet Challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Stanislaw Swianiewicz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An Economist and a political scientist studying the postwar world cannot fail to be impressed by two outstanding features of postwar development: the expansion of the military and economic power of the Soviet Union and the acceleration of economic growth throughout the world, particularly in the advanced capitalist countries. In this article I propose to investigate possible interrelations of these phenomena.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 455 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Goldsmith, R., “The Economic Growth of Tsarist Russia 1860–1913” in Economic Development and Cultural Change, 04, 1961, p. 473.Google Scholar

2 Bergson, A. and Kuznets, S.,Economic Trends in the Soviet Union Cambridge 1963, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Cohn, Stanley H., “Soviet Growth Retardation” in New Directions in the Soviet Economy, Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the US, Part II-A (Washington, D.C., 1966), p. 105.Google Scholar

4 Pravda, April 7, 1966.

5 Kuznets, Simon, Modern Economic Growth (New Haven, 1966), pp. 64–65.Google Scholar

6 Statystyczny, Rocznik, 1966 (Warsaw, 1966), p. 600.Google Scholar

7 Maurice Ernst, “Overstatement of Industrial Growth in Poland,” Quarterly Journal of Economics (1965), p. 623.Google Scholar

8 Joint Economic Committee of the United States Congress, New Directions of the Soviet Economy (Washington, D.C., 1966), p. 881.Google Scholar

9 Joint Economic Committee of the United States Congress, An Economic Profile of Mainland China (Washington, D.C., 1967)Google Scholar; Mainland China in the World Economy (Washington, D.C., 1967).Google Scholar

10 Eckstein, Alexander, Communist China's Economic Growth and Foreign Trade (New York, 1966), p. 51.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., p. 3.

12 Maddison, Angus, Economic Growth in the West (New York, 1964), p. 25.Google Scholar

13 Annual Rate of Growth of Total Output:

14 OECD, Economic Growth: A Mid-decade Review of Prospects (Paris, 1966), p. 11.Google Scholar

15 UN Statistical Yearbook 1966.Google Scholar

16 Wall Street Journal, 01 31, 1968.Google Scholar

17 Funk, & Wagnalls, , Standard College Dictionary (Toronto, 1963).Google Scholar

18 Ibid., p. 99.

19 Berle, Adolf A., The 20th Century Capitalist Revolution (New York, 1954);Google ScholarThe American Economic Republic (New York, 1963).Google Scholar

20 Adolf A.Berle, Ibid., p. 50.

21 The concept of monopolistic capitalism was developed by Lenin in his major work Imperialism as the Latest Stage of Capitalism written under the influence of his contemporaries, R. Hilferding and J. A. Hobson in particular. In that analysis he mentioned also a certain tendency towards some kind of amalgamation (srashchivanie) between big corporations and state agencies, that is, transformation of monopolistic capitalism into state capitalism. This tendency was also mentioned in the Second Program of the Russian Communist Party adopted in March, 1919. In the Third Program, adopted at the end of 1961, the term state monopoly capitalism was substituted for monopolistic capitalism.

22 Lenin, , “A Characterisation of Economic Romanticism,” first published in 1897, Collected Works (English Edition), Vol. 2 (Moscow, 1960).Google Scholar

23 Leroy, Maxime, Histoire des I dies Sociales en France (Paris, 1950), Chs. VI and X.Google Scholar

24 Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, 1962).Google Scholar

25 Nicolaevski, Boris, Power and the Soviet Elite (New York, 1965) pp. 18–19.Google Scholar

26 Clark, Colin, The Conditions of Economic Progress (London 1951; pp. 100–101.Google Scholar

27 “The heroic legend of German reconstruction as a spontaneous upsurge of aggressive private enterprise has been so sedulously fostered that the crucial part played by the public authorities in the process tends to be overlooked. In fact they not only supplied money, but also exercised a significant influence in selecting the projects on which it was to be spent,” Shonfield, A.Modern Capitalism (London, 1965), p. 276.Google Scholar

28 Beillard, M. J. “Economic Integration in the E.E.C. and in the Comecon” an unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics The University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar

29 Berliner, Joseph, Factory-Manager in the U.S.S.R.. (Cambridge, 1957);CrossRefGoogle ScholarGrancik, David, The Red Executive (Garden City, 1950).Google Scholar

30 Zaleski, Eugene, Planning Reforms in the Soviet Union, 1962–1966 (Chapel Hill, 1967), Ch. I.Google Scholar

31 Joseph Berliner, Ibid.

32 This book (London, 1961) is a revised edition of Der Sowjetmensch (Stuttgart, 1958).Google Scholar

33 Schaff, Adam, Marksizm a jednostka ludzka (Marxism and the Human Individual) (Warsaw, 1965).Google Scholar

34 Jordan, Z. A., “Socializm i czlowiek wyobcowany” (Socialism and the Alienated Man), Kultura (Paris, 05, 1966).Google Scholar

35 The characteristics of this elite are well presented in Robert Conquest Russia After Khrushchev (New York, 1965).Google Scholar