Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:29:11.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How does age affect the success of total replacement of the hip joint?

Part of: Bespoke shallow archive Weizmann

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

Thomas E Cope
Thomas E Cope*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
*
Address for correspondence: TE Cope, Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 1TA E-mail: thomascope@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Primary total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most common and cost-effective major operations performed in the developed world: annually approximately 50,000 are undertaken in England and Wales and over half a million are performed worldwide. The majority of these operations are performed for primary or secondary osteoarthritis (over 75% from Swedish data), traumatic fracture (11.3%) or rheumatoid arthritis (6%), but indications are varied and include avascular necrosis, congenital dislocation, Paget's disease, and ankylosing spondylitis. The primary goal of the procedure is the relief of pain that can no longer be controlled by analgesia or non-operative procedures, but severely impaired mobility affecting independence is a secondary indication.

Type
Clinical geriatrics
Information
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , August 2008 , pp. 211 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Technology Appraisal Report 2002; 44.Google Scholar
2Birrell, F, Johnell, O, Silman, A. Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next 3 decades: influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery. Ann Rheum Dis 1999; 999:569–72.Google Scholar
3Bulstrode, JK, Ritchie, IK. Surgery for arthritis in the hip and knee. In: Russell, RCG, Williams, NS, Bulstrode, CJK (eds). Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery. London: Arnold, 2004: 406–19.Google Scholar
4Karlson, EW, Mandl, LA, Aweh, GN, Sangha, O, Liang, MH, Grodstein, F. Total hip replacement due to osteoarthritis: the importance of age, obesity, and other modifiable risk factors. Am J Med 2003; 114: 93–8.Google Scholar
5Frankel, S, Eachus, J, Pearson, N, Greenwood, R, Chan, P, Peters, TJ et al. Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 1999; 353:1304–9.Google Scholar
6National Institute for Clinical Excellence. The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of celecoxib, rofecoxib, meloxicam and etodolac (Cox-II inhibitors) for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Technology Appraisal Report 2000; 27.Google Scholar
7Polanczyk, CA, Marcantonio, E, Goldman, L, Rohde, LEP, Orav, J, Mangione, CM et al. Impact of age on perioperative complications and length of stay in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 637–43.Google Scholar
8BUPA. Hip Replacement Patient Factsheet 2007. http://hcd2.bupa.co.uk/fact_sheets/html/Hip_replacement.html. Retrieved: 7 April 2008.Google Scholar
9Buckwalter, AE, Callaghan, JJ, Liu, SS, Pedersen, DR, Goetz, DD, Sullivan, PM et al. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved femoral cementing techniques. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1481–85.Google Scholar
10Crowther, JD, Lachiewicz, PF. Survival and polyethylene wear of porous-coated acetabular components in patients less than fifty years old: results at nine to fourteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 729–35.Google Scholar
11Dorr, LD, Takei, GK, Conaty, JP. Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65: 474–79.Google Scholar
12McAuley, JPMD, Szuszczewicz, ESMD, Young, AMSE, Engh, CASMD. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res 2004; 418: 119–25.Google Scholar
13Lehtimaki, MY, Lehto, MUK, Kautiainen, HSavolainen, HA, Hamalainen, MMJ. Survivorship of the Charnley total hip arthroplasty in juvenile chronic arthritis: a follow-up of 186 cases for 22 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79-B: 792–95.Google Scholar
14Mont, MA, LaPorte, DM, Mullick, T, Silberstein, CE, Hungerford, DS. Tennis after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 60–4.Google Scholar
15Devane, PA, Robinson, EJ, Bourne, RB, Rorabeck, CH, Nayak, NN, Horne, JG. Measurement of polyethylene wear in acetabular components inserted with and without cement. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 682–89.Google Scholar
16Jasty, MJ, Floyd, WE, Schiller, AL, Goldring, SR, Harris, WH. Localized osteolysis in stable, non-septic total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 912–19.Google Scholar
17Chandler, HP, Reineck, FT, Wixson, RL, McCarthy, JC. Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63: 1426–34.Google Scholar
18Dorr, LD, Luckett, M, Conaty, JP. Total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 45 years: a nine- to ten-year follow-up study. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res 1990; 260: 215–19.Google Scholar
19Torchia, ME, Klassen, RA, Bianco, AJ. Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients less than twenty years old. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 995–1003.Google Scholar
20Keener, JD, Callaghan, JJ, Goetz, DD, Pederson, DR, Sullivan, PM, Johnston, RC. Twenty-five-year results after Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old: A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1066–72.Google Scholar
21Barrack, RL, Mulroy, RD Jr, Harris, WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review.J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74-B: 385–89.Google Scholar
22Ballard, WT, Callaghan, JJ, Sullivan, PM, Johnston, RC. The results of improved cementing techniques for total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76:959–64.Google Scholar
23Cornell, CN, Ranawat, CS. Survivorship analysis of total hip replacements. Results in a series of active patients who were less than fifty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 1430–34.Google Scholar
24Raut, VV, Wroblewski, BM, Siney, PD. Revision hip arthroplasty. Can the octogenarian take it? J Arthroplasty 1993; 8: 401–3.Google Scholar
25Radcliffe, GS, Tomichan, MC, Andrews, M, Stone, MH. Revision hip surgery in the elderly: is it worthwhile? J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 38–44.Google Scholar
26Levy, RN, Levy, CM, Snyder, J, Digiovanni, J. Outcome and long-term results following total hip replacement in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 316: 25–30.Google Scholar
27Mitchell, S, McCaskie, A, Francis, R, Peaston, R, Birrell, F, Lingard, E. The need for a falls prevention programme for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement surgery. J Orthopaed Nursing 2007; 11: 98–103.Google Scholar
28Blom, A, Pattison, G, Whitehouse, S, Taylor, A, Bannister, G. Early death following primary total hip arthroplasty: 1727 procedures with mechanical thrombo-prophylaxis. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 347–50.Google Scholar
29Fruitman, DS, MacDougall, CE, Ross, DB. Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: can elderly patients benefit? Quality of life after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 2129–35.Google Scholar
30Seymour, D. Pre-operative assessment of the older surgical patient. CME Geriat Med 2008; 10: 85–93.Google Scholar
31Parvizi, J, Pour, AE, Keshavarzi, NR, D'Apuzzo, M, Sharkey, PF, Hozack, WJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. A case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 2612–18.Google Scholar
32Newington, DP, Bannister, GC, Fordyce, M. Primary total hip replacement in patients over 80 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72-B: 450–52.Google Scholar
33McDonald, JE, Huo, MH. Total hip replacement: unique challenges in the obese and geriatric populations. Curr Opin Orthoped 2008; 19: 33–6.Google Scholar
34Ramiah, RD, Ashmore, AM, Whitley, E, Bannister, GC. Ten-year life expectancy after primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89-B: 1299–302.Google Scholar
35D'Souza, SR, Sadiq, S, New, AMR, Northmore-Ball, MD. Proximal femoral osteotomy as the primary operation for young adults who have osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1428–38.Google Scholar
36Vale, L, Wyness, L, McCormack, K, McKenzie, L, Brazzelli, M, Stearns, SC. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technol Assess 2002; 6: 1–109.Google Scholar
37de la Rosa, MA, Silver, M, Heisel, C, Reich, M. Range of motion after total hip resurfacing. Orthopedics 2007; 30: 352–57.Google Scholar
38Daniel, J, Pynsent, PB, McMinn, DJW. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-B: 177–84.Google Scholar
39Howie, DW, McGee, MA, Costi, K, Graves, SE. Metal-on-metal resurfacing versus total hip replacement – the value of a randomized clinical trial. Orthoped Clin N Am 2005; 36: 195–201.Google Scholar
40Macaulay, W. Total hip resurfacing: a viable alternative to total hip arthroplasty for the young active hip patient in the United States? Curr Opin Orthoped 2008; 19: 2–5.Google Scholar
41Ball, ST, Le Duff, MJ, Amstutz, HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 735–41.Google Scholar
42Ball, S, Amstutz, H, Le Duff, M. How easy is it to revise a failed resurfacing of the hip? J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 326.Google Scholar
43Ranawat, CS, Ranawat, AS. A common sense approach to minimally invasive total hip replacement. Orthopedics 2005; 28: 937–38.Google Scholar
44Collis, DK. Long-term (twelve to eighteen-year) follow-up of cemented total hip replacements in patients who were less than fifty years old. A follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 593–97.Google Scholar