Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:45:47.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of redundant robots to constrained-motion tasks*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Veljko Potkonjak
Veljko Potkonjak
Affiliation:
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Revolucije 73, 11000 Belgrade (Yugoslavia)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The problem of the constrained motion of robot end-effector is discussed. The redundant robot is considered, redundancy being added in order to improve robot working characteristics. In the phase of free motion towards the constraint the errors of basic non-redundant configuration are corrected by means of redundancy. During the constrained motion redundancy plays the role either of active or passive compliance. Between these two phases, the collision with the constraint occurs, and the impact can be absorbed by using redundancy.

Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 10 , Issue 5 , September 1992 , pp. 397 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Vukobratović, M. and Potkonjak, V., Applied Dynamics and CAD of Manipulation Robots (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Potkonjak, V. and Vukobratović, M., “Dynamics of Manipulation Mechanisms with Constrained Gripper Motion”, J. Robotic Systems 3(3), 321–334 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Vukobratović, M. and Potkonjak, V., “Constrained Gripper Motion in Assembly Manipulation” J. Robotic Systems 3(3), 335–347 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Stokić, D. and Vukobratović, M., “Simulation and Control Synthesis of Manipulator in Assembling Mechanical Elements” J. Mechanism and Machine Theory 16, 71–79 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Vukobratović, M. and Stokić, D., Control of Manipulation Robots (Springer-Verlag, Bertin, 1982).Google Scholar
[6]Vukobratović, M. and Kirćanski, M., “A Dynamic Approach to Nominal Trajectory Synthesis for Redundant Manipulators” IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 14, No. 4, 212–220 (1984).Google Scholar
[7]Benhabib, B., Goldenberg, A.A. and Fenton, R.G., “A Solution to the Inverse Kinematics of Redundant Manipulators”, J. Robotic Systems, 2(4), 373–385 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Benhabib, B., Goldenberg, A.A. and Fenton, R.G., “Continuous Path Planning for Seven-Degrees-of-Freedom Robots” J. Engin, for Industry 108, 213–218 (1986).Google Scholar
[9]Potkonjak, V., “Distributed Positioning for Redundant Robotic Systems” Robotica 8, 61–67 (1990).Google Scholar
[10]Potkonjak, V. and Krstulović, A., “Improvement of Dynamic Capabilities of Heavy Robots” Robotica 8, 217–222 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Potkonjak, V. and Krstulović, A., “Robotic Welding System with Parallel Degrees of Freedom” J. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 8, No. 3, 171–174 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Orin, D.E. and Schrader, W.W., “Efficient Computation of the Jacobian for Robot Manipulators” Int. J. Robotics Res. 3, No. 4, 66–75 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Chumenko, V.N. and Yushtchenko, A.S., “Impact Effects Upon Manipulation Robot Mechanism” (in Russian) Technical Cybernetics 4, 23–32 (1981).Google Scholar
[14]Potkonjak, V. and Vukobratović, M., “Two Methods for Computer Forming of Dynamic Equations of Active Mechanisms” J. Mechanisms and Machine Theory 14, No. 3, 189–200 (1979).Google Scholar
[15]Hollerbach, J.M., “A Recursive Lagrangian Formulation of Manipulator Dynamics and a Comparative Study of Dynamic Formulation Complexity” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-10 (11), 730–736 (1980).Google Scholar
[16]Milutinović, D. and Potkonjak, V., “New Concept of the SCARA Robot” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 7, No. 3/4, 337–343 (1990).Google Scholar