Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:22:29.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The modification of pre-planned manipulator paths to improve the gross motions associated with the pick and place task

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

David A. Sanders
David A. Sanders
Affiliation:
School of Systems Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Anglesea Road, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ (UK)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper presents research work which crosses the divide between “Path Planning” and “Trajectory Generation & Tracking”. These subjects have tended to develop along two parallel lines, in isolation from each other. The work uses the Lagrange formulation for the three major joints of an industrial manipulator. Simple planning rules are developed from this formulation. The rules are used to select new paths for a manipulator rather than to improve preplanned trajectories. The method has been applied to pick and place tasks requiring gross motions of the manipulator and the results are presented. It is shown that using this method, pre-planned manipulator paths can be modified to improve the gross motions associated with the pick and place task.

Keywords

Pick and placeGross motionsLagrange formulationPath planning
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 77 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Balding, N. W.,“Real time path planning for robot arms” Ph.D. Dissertation (University of Durham, UK, 1987).Google Scholar
2.Sanders, D. A.,“Automatic robot path planning with constraints” Ph.D. Dissertation (Portsmouth Polytechnic, UK, 1990).Google Scholar
3.Sanders, D. A.,Making Complex Machinery Move: automatic programming and motion planning(Research Studies Press&J. Wiley&Sons, Chichester&New York, 1993).Google Scholar
4.Spurgeon, D. and Apampa, o., “Advances in manufacturing technology VI (Bell and Bain, Glasgow, UK, 1991) pp. 331–336.Google Scholar
5.Sanders, D. A., Liu, K. P. and Stott, I.,“Automatic motion planning through an environment generated by GRASP” Proc. Dedicated Conference on Mechatronics,Aachen, Germany(1993) pp. 631–638.Google Scholar
6.Fraichard, T., Hassoun, M. and Laugier, C.,“Reactive motion planning in a dynamic world” Proc. of 5th Int.Conf. on Advanced RoboticsPisa, Italy(1991) pp. 1029a–1032.Google Scholar
7.Barraquand, J., Langlois, B. and Latombe, J. C., “Numerical potential field techniques for robot path planning” Proc. of 5th Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics,Pisa, Italy(1991) pp. 1012–1017.Google Scholar
8.Khatib, O.,“Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation(1986) pp. 500–505Google Scholar
Int. J. Robotic Research 5, No. 1, 90–98 (1986).Google Scholar
9.Sanders, D. A., Moore, A. and Luk, B.,“A joint space technique for real time path planning” Proc. of 5th Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics,Pisa, Italy(1991) pp. 1683–1689.Google Scholar
10.Fu, K. S., Gonzalez, R. C. and Lee, C. S. G.,Robotics: control, sensing, vision and intelligence (McGraw-Hill International, Singapore, 1987) pp. 82–144Google Scholar
11.Uicker, J. J.,“Dynamic force analysis of spatial linkages” Proc. of Mechanisms Conference(1966) pp. 108–114.Google Scholar
12.Kahn, W. E.,“The near minimum time control of open loop articulated kinematic chains” Ph.D. Dissertation (Comp. Sri. Dept., Stanford University, USA, 1969).Google Scholar
13.Haddad, F. B., “Design and performance of a position controlled manipulator” Ph.D. Dissertation (Sussex University, UK, 1985).Google Scholar
14.Kumar, S., “Motion planning with obstacles and dynamic constraints” Ph.D. Dissertation (Cornell University, USA, 1988).Google Scholar
15.Bejczy, A. K.,“Robot arm dynamics and control” NASA-jpl Technical Memorandum (1974) pp. 33–669.Google Scholar
16.Brady, M. et al. ,Robotics Science (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.., 1989)Google Scholar
17.Paul, R. P.,Robotic Manipulators: mathematics, programming and control (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 1982).Google Scholar
18.Sanders, D. A.,Billingsley, J. and Naghdy, F.,“Adaptive path control to minimize current and torque transients in motors using information from the servo amplifiers connected to robot joints, Proc. of CADCAM 87 Conference,Birmingham UK(1987) pp. 355–363Google Scholar
19.Sanders, D. A., Herring, D.Naghdy, F. and Billingsley, J.,“Advances in adaptive path control using information from servo amplifier currents” Proc. of 3rd Int. Conf. on Electrical Machines and Drives,London, UK(1987) pp. 300–305.Google Scholar