Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:16:31.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the use of deformation matrices in artificial vision Systems*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Guy Jumarie
Guy Jumarie
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Université du Québec à Montreal, P.O. Box 8888, St A, Montréal, Quebec H3C 3P8 (Canada)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

At present, the procedure which is most widely used to identify an object consists of displacing its image in order that it be as close as possible to a reference pattern, and then to make a decision based upon the value of an Euclidean distance. This decision may be either in a deterministic framework or in a statistical one. The transformations so involved are translation and rotation. It is shown that, if one takes for granted the invariance of the amount of information involved by the object considered as an informational source, then there is another class of transformations, referred to as deformation, which should be also taken into account. The question is examined, and its consequences in the design of artificial vision are outlined in both the deterministic and stochastic cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 13 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Noton, D. and Stark, L., Sciences 171, 308 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Nicolis, J.S., Meyer-Kress, G. and Haubs, G., “Non-Uniform Chaotic Dynamics with Implications to Information Processing” Z. Naturforsch. 38a, 1157–1169 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Noton, D., IEEE Trans. Systems Sc. and Cybernetics SSC-6, No 4, 349 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.McPherson, C.A. and Hall, E.L., “Three-Dimensional Robot Vision Techniques” In: Recent Advances in Robotics (Beni, G. and Hackwood, S., Eds.) (John Wiley, New York, 1985) pp. 263–312.Google Scholar
5.Denavit, J. and Hartenberg, R.S., “A Kinematic Notation for Lower Pair Mechanism Based on Matrices”. J. Applied Mechanics 215–221 (06, 1985).Google Scholar
6.Paul, R.P., Robot Manipulators (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
7.Horn, B.K.P., Robot Vision (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar