Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:56:10.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Liberation Theology Survive 1989?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Duncan B. Forrester
Duncan B. Forrester
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh New CollegeMound Place Edinburgh EH 12LX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There was a widespread assumption in the 1980s that liberation theology had come of age. The early passionate manifestos of those such as Hugo Assmann had been replaced by a deluge of substantial theological works which entered the theological debate bearing the wounds of oppression and injustice in Latin America, and also the clear marks of the European academy. Liberation theology remained highly controversial, but it had to be taken seriously. It suggested a new way of doing theology which was at one and the same time a recovery of older understandings of the nature of theology and rooted in Latin American reality. It plundered and turned on their original possessors the weapons of post-Enlightenment and post-Vatican II theologising, and it was viewed with deep suspicion by most of the authorities in church and state. The movement found resonances and allies in many countries of the Third World, and spread from systematics into biblical studies, ethics and pastoral theology.

Type
Article Review
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , May 1994 , pp. 245 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sugirtharajah, R. S., ed., Voices from the Margin: Interpreting the Bible in the Third World, London, SPCK, 1991Google Scholar; Comblin, Jose, Retrieving the Human: A Christian Anthropology, Maryknoll, Orbis, 1990Google Scholar; Boff, Clodovis and Pixley, George, The Bible, the Church and the Poor, Maryknoll, Orbis, 1990Google Scholar; Moser, A. and Leers, B., Moral Theology, London, Burns and Oates, 1990).Google Scholar

2 McKelway, Alex J., The Freedom of Cod and Human Liberation, London, SCM, 1990.Google Scholar

3 Hennelly, Alfred T., Liberation Theology: A Documentary History, Maryknoll, Orbis, 1990.Google Scholar

4 Pottinger, John R., The Political Theory of Liberation Theology, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1989.Google Scholar

5 See Marx and the Bible, London, SCM, 1977Google Scholar; Communism in the Bible, London, SCM, 1982Google Scholar and Marx against the Marxists: The Christian Humanism of Karl Marx, London, SCM, 1980.Google Scholar

6 Arrupe, Pedro, ‘Marxist Analysis by Christians’ (1980) in Liberation Theology: A Documentary History, pp. 307–313.Google Scholar

7 Fierro, A., The Militant Gospel, London, SCM, 1977.Google Scholar

8 van Leeuwen, A., Critique of Heaven, London, Lutterworth, 1974, chapter 10.Google Scholar

9 Instruction on Certain Aspects of the ‘Theology of Liberation’, 1984, and Instruction on Christian Freedom and Liberation, 1986. Also see the documents in Hennelly, parts V and VI.

10 Centesimus Annus, London, Catholic Truth Society, 1991, p. 19.Google Scholar

11 In their very different styles, E. R. Norman (Christianity and World Order, 1979) and Milbank, John (Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, Oxford, Blackwell, 1990)Google Scholar both dispute the possibility of an equal and productive relationship.