Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:48:14.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predestination: A Scottish Perspective1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

David A. S. Fergusson
David A. S. Fergusson
Affiliation:
Department of Divinity with Religious StudiesKing's CollegeOld Aberdeen AB9 2UB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In contemporary Scottish culture the subject of predestination is guaranteed to evoke a variety of reactions ranging from horror and disgust on the one hand to laughter and ridicule on the other. It is viewed by some as a nightmare scenario devised by Christian theologians in their worst moments, while for odiers it is a ludicrous aberration of the medieval and Reformation mind. It is perceived frequently as the trademark of a theological mindset which is marked by harshness, legalism and a fatalistic attitude towards life. A clear example of this is Edwin Muir's biography of Knox which writes vitriolically of the oppression and tyranny of the predestinarian religion that was imported from Calvin's Geneva.

Type
Research Article
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , November 1993 , pp. 457 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 John Knox: Portrait of a Calvinisl (London, 1930), pp. 99–121Google Scholar. The two best known statements of hte doctrine of predestination in Scottish culture are probably the third chapter of the Westminster Confession (1646) and its parody in Holy Willie's invocation (1784). Burns, Robert, ‘Holy Willie's Prayer’, Poems and Songsed. Kinsley, J., (Oxford, 1969), p. 56.Google Scholar

3 ‘First Apology’, Chapter 44, The Writings of Justin Martyr and Athenagoras (Edinburgh, 1897)Google Scholar.

4 The Longer Catechism of the Church, Russian states that ‘As he foresaw that some would use well their free will, but others ill, he accordingly predestined the former to glory, while the latter he condemned.’ The Doctrine of the Russian Church, ed. Blackmore, R. W. (London, 1845), p. 55.Google Scholar

5 ‘On Free Will’ in Earlier Writings, (Library of Christian Classics, London, 1953), Book III, pp. 174ff.Google Scholar

6 ‘On the Predestination of the Saints’, Anti-Pelagian Writings (Edinburgh, 1876), Volume III, Chapter 11Google Scholar.

7 For a discussion of the relation between freedom, grace, foreknowledge and predestination in Augustine see Evans, G. R., Augustine on Evil (Cambridge, 1982), pp. 112–149.Google Scholar

8 This criticism is made by Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics 11–2, ed. Bromiley, G. and Torrance, T. F., (Edinburgh, 1957), pp. 16 & 307Google Scholar.

9 City of Cod, Book XI, Chapter 23. Cf. Hick, John, Evil and the Cod of Love (London, 1966), pp. 88–95Google Scholar.

10 Luther, and Erasmus, , Free Will and Salvation, (Library of Christian Classics, London, 1969), p. 140Google Scholar.

11 Institutes of the Christian Religion, ed. McNeill, J. T. (Philadelphia, 1960), Book III, Chapters XXffGoogle Scholar. Concerning the Eternal Predestination of Cod, ed. Reid, J. K. S., (London, 1961)Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., III. 23. 6.

13 It should not be assumed, of course, thai pre-Reformation thinkers in Scotland had not wrestled with theological and philosophical problems relating to the doctrine. For a discussion of the work of John Ireland and William Manderston see Broadie, Alexander, The Tradition of Scottish Philosophy (Edinburgh, 1990), pp. 12–19, 52–73Google Scholar.

14 The Scots Confession, Creeds of the Evangelical Protestant Churches, ed. Schaff, P. (New York, 1881), pp. 444ffGoogle Scholar. Fora helpful analysis of the theological context of the Scots Confession see Hazlett, W. I. A., ‘The Scots Confession 1560: Context, Complexion and Critique’, Archiv für Reformationsgeschichtete, 78 1987, pp. 287–320Google Scholar.

15 The Knowledge of Cod and the Service of Cod (London, 1938), pp. 68–79Google Scholar. Cf. Church Dogmatics 11–2, op. cit., p. 308.

16 ‘On Predestination in Answer to the Cavillations by an Anabaptist’, Collected Works V (Edinburgh, 1861), pp. 208ffGoogle Scholar. For a discussion of this see McEwan, J. S., The Faith of John Knox (London, 1961), pp. 63–79Google Scholar.

17 The Origins of the Federal Theology in Sixteenth Century Reformation Thought (Oxford, 1990), p. 100Google Scholar.

18 ‘The Five Arminian Articles AD 1610’ and ‘The Canons of the Synod of Dort AD 1619’ are found in Schaff, P. ed., Creeds of the Evangelical Protestant Church (New York, 1882), pp. 545–597Google Scholar.

19 For a discussion of the influence of the Synod of Don in Scotland see Henderson, G. D., Religious Life in Seventeenth Century Scotland (Cambridge, 1937), pp. 77–99Google Scholar.

20 Mitchell, A. F., Minutes of the Westminster Assembly of Divines (Edinburgh, 1874), pp. 46ffGoogle Scholar.

21 Ibid. pp. 151–152.

22 E.g. The Covenant of Life Opened (Edinburgh, 1655), p. 14Google Scholar; ‘Rutherford's Catechism’, Catechisms of the Second Reformation (London, 1886), ed. Mitchell, A. F., pp. 161–242Google Scholar. For discussions of Rutherford's supralapsarianism see, Walker, James, The Theology and Theologians of Scotland 1560–1750, (Edinburgh, 1872), p. 50Google Scholar; Bell, M. C., Calvin and Scottish Theology (Edinburgh, 1985), pp. 70–91Google Scholar.

23 Torrance, J. B., ‘Covenant or Contract’, Scottish Journal of Theology, 23, 1970, pp. 51–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘The Covenant Concept in Scottish Theology and Politics and Its Legacy’, Scottish Journal of Theology, 34, 1981, pp. 225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Strengths and Weaknesses of the Westminster Theology, The Westminster Confession in the Church Today, ed. Heron, A. I. C. (Edinburgh 1982), pp. 40–54Google Scholar. Cf. The survey of the Scottish theological tradition in the ‘Report of the Special Commission on Baptism’, Reports of the General Assembly, 1958, pp. 686–762.

24 Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter XI.

25 Although, in relation to the foreknowledge and decree of God, the first cause, all things come to pass immutably and infallibly; yet, by the same providence, he ordereth them to fall out according to the nature of second causes, either necessarily, freely, or contingently. Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter V.

26 ‘Of Liberty and Necessity’, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Selby-Bigge, , (Oxford, 1975), pp. 80–103Google Scholar.

27 For further discussion of this period see Drummond, A. L. and Bulloch, J., The Scottish Church 1688–1843 (Edinburgh, 1973), pp. 64–113Google Scholar; Voges, Friedholm, ‘Moderate and Evangelical Thinking in the later Eighteenth Century: Differences and Shared Attitudes’, Records of the Scottish Church History Society, 22, 1986, pp. 141–157Google Scholar; Sher, Richard B., ‘Literature and the Church of Scotland’, The History of Scottish Literature, Vol. 2, 1660–1800, ed. Hook, A., (Aberdeen, 1987), pp. 259–272Google Scholar.

28 Institutes of Theology, II, (Edinburgh, 1849), p. 366Google Scholar.

29 Ibid. p. 352.

30 Ibid. p. 384.

31 The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner (Oxford, 1981), pp. 122–123Google Scholar. Cf. Mack, D., ‘Hogg's Religion and “The Confessions of ajustified Sinner’’, Studies in Scottish Literature, 7, 1970, pp. 272–275Google Scholar.

32 Erskine, Thomas, The Doctrine of Election, Second Edition, (Edinburgh, 1878), p. 120Google Scholar.

33 Discussed by Cheyne, A. C., The Transforming of the Kirk (Edinburgh, 1983), pp. 63ffGoogle Scholar.

34 Practice and Procedure in the Church of Scotland, ed. Cox, J. T., (Edinburgh, 1976), p. 435Google Scholar.

35 The Church of Scotland's formal endorsement of the Short Statement of Faith (1935) and the Leuenberg Lutheran-Reformed Concordat (1973) indicates a further departure from the predestinarian scheme of the Westminster theology.

36 Church Dogatics II-2, ed. Bromiley, G. W. and Torrance, T. F. (Edinburgh, 1957), p. 111Google Scholar.

37 Ibid. p. 3.

38 Reid, J. K. S., ‘The Office of Christ in Predestination’, Scottish Journal of Theology, 1, 1948, pp. 5–18, 166–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Introduction’ to Calvin, John, Concerning the Eternal Predestination of God (London, 1961), pp. 9–44Google Scholar. Torrance, T. F., ‘Predestination in Christ’, Evangelical Quarterly, 13, 1941, pp. 108–114Google Scholar; ‘Universalism or Election’, Scottish Journal of Theology, 2, 1949, pp. 310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Hendry, George, The Westminster Confession in the Church Today (London, 1960), pp. 49–58Google Scholar.

39 Op. cit. p. 141.

40 for Barth's repudiation of the charge of universalism see ibid. pp. 417ff.

41 This is a standard libertation objection to Hume's theory of free will. Cf. Stroud, Barry, Hume (London, 1977), pp. 151ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Cf. T. F. Torrance, ‘Predestination in Christ’, op. cit. pp. 123–124.

43 E.g. Church Dogmatics III/3, ed. Bromiley, G. and Torrance, T. F. (Edinburgh, 1960), pp. 118ffGoogle Scholar.

44 Cited by Wiggins, David, ‘Towards a Reasonable Libertarianism’, Essays on the Freedom of Action, ed. Honderich, T. (London, 1973), p. 53Google Scholar.

45 Cf. Lucas, J. R., ‘Foreknowledge and the Vulnerability of God’, The Philosophy in Christianity, ed. Vesey, G., (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 119–128Google Scholar.

46 E.g. McFague, Sallie, Models of God (London, 1987), pp. 16ffGoogle Scholar. The claim that the sovereignty of God enables rather than defeats human endeavour is argued by Sontag, Frederick, ‘Metaphorical Non-Sequitur’, Scottish Journal of Theology, 44, 1991, pp. 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Colin Gunton, appealing to Edward Irving, argues that a stronger account of the Holy Spirit's activity in the present can offset a rigid determinism on the one hand, and a capricious subjectivism on the other. ‘The Triune God and the Freedom of the Creature’, Karl Barth: Centenary Essays, ed. Sykes, S. W. (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 63ffGoogle Scholar.