Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:28:22.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discrete levels of desiccation sensitivity in various seeds as determined by the equilibrium dehydration method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Wendell Q. Sun  and
Yongheng Liang
Wendell Q. Sun*
Affiliation:
LifeCell Corporation, One Millennium Way, Branchburg, NJ 08875, USA
Yongheng Liang
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore119260
*
*Correspondence Fax: (908) 947-1085 Email: wsun@lifecell.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the hypothesis that desiccation sensitivities of recalcitrant and intermediate seeds can be categorized into discrete levels of critical water potential. The equilibrium dehydration method was used to determine the critical water potential (CWP) below which desiccation damage started to occur. The CWP values of Bruguiera cylindrica, Lansium domesticum, Litchi chinensis and Lumitzera racemosa are approximately –4 MPa. The CWP values of Andira inermis, Avicennia alba, Castanea sinensis (from New Zealand), Citrus aurantifolia, Ginkgo biloba, Nephelium lappaceum and Theobroma cacao (immature axis) are approximately –8 MPa. The CWP values of Acer pseudoplatanus, Castanea sinensis (from China), Quercus rubra and Theobroma cacao(mature axis) are approximately –12 MPa. The CWP values of Artocarpus heterophyllus and Hevea brasiliensis are approximately -23 MPa, while the CWP values of Acer platanoides, Azadirachta indica, Carica papaya and Coffea arabica are approximately –73 MPa. Together with data available in earlier literature, these CWP values suggest that there are five discrete levels of critical water potential among desiccation-sensitive seed tissues. These data support the hypothesis that discrete levels of desiccation sensitivity occur among recalcitrant and intermediate seeds, and suggest that specific damaging and protective mechanisms exist at certain hydration levels.

Keywords

desiccation sensitivitydesiccation tolerancerecalcitrant seedwater stressAcer platanoidesAcer pseudoplatanusAndira inermisArtocarpus heterophyllusAvicennia albaAzadirachta indicaBruguiera cylindricaCarica papayaCastanea sinensisCitrus aurantifoliaCoffea arabicaGinkgo bilobaHevea brasiliensisLansium domesticumLitchi chinensisLumitzera racemosaNephelium lappaceumQuercus rubraTheobroma cacao
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 317 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASTM (1983) Maintaining constant relative humidity by means of aqueous solutions. pp. 8(03) 572–575in American Society for Testing and Materials (Ed.) 1983 Annual book of ASTM standards (Standard E104). Philadelphia, American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
Berjak, P., Pammenter, N.W. and Vertucci, C. (1992) Homoiohydrous (recalcitrant) seeds: developmental status, desiccation sensitivity and the state of water in axes of Landolphia kirkii Dyer. Planta 186, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berjak, P., Vertucci, C.W. and Pammenter, N.W. (1993) Effects of developmental status and dehydration rate on characteristics of water and desiccation-sensitivity in recalcitrant seeds of Camellia sinensis. Seed Science Research 3, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussert, S., Chabrillange, N., Engelmann, F. and Hamon, S. (1999) Quantitative estimation of seed desiccation sensitivity using a quantal response model: application to nine species of the genus Coffea L. Seed Science Research 9, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H., Hong, T.D. and Roberts, E.H. (1990) An intermediate category of seed storage behaviour I. Coffee. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 1167–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H., Hong, T.D. and Roberts, E.H. (1991) An intermediate category of seed storage behaviour II. Effects of provenance, immaturity, and imbibition on desiccation-tolerance in coffee. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 653–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M. and Walters, C. (1998) Ultrastructural and biophysical changes in developing embryos of Aesculus hippocastanum in relation to acquisition of tolerance to drying. Physiologia Plantarum 104, 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Berjak, P. and Pammenter, N.W. (1985) The effect of drying rate on viability retention of recalcitrant propagules of Avicennia marina. South African Journal of Botany 51, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1988) Recalcitrance – a current assessment. Seed Science and Technology 16, 155–166.Google Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E. (1992) Seed development in the recalcitrant species Quercus robur L.: germinability and desiccation tolerance. Seed Science Research 2, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, T.D. and Ellis, E.H. (1996) A protocol to determine seed storage behariour. Rome, IPGRI.Google Scholar
Leprince, O., Vertucci, C.W., Hendry, G.A.F. and Atherton, N.M. (1995) The expression of desiccation-induced damage in orthodox seeds is a function of oxygen and temperature. Physiologia Plantarum 94, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y.H. and Sun, W.Q. (2000) Desiccation tolerance of recalcitrant Theobroma cacao embryonic axes: the optimal drying rate and its physiological basis. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1911–1919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Normah, M.N., Chin, H.F. and Hor, Y.L. (1986) Desiccation and cryopreservation of embryonic axes of Hevea brasiliensis Muell.-Agr. Pertanika 9, 299–303.Google Scholar
Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1999) A review of recalcitrant seed physiology in relation to desiccationtolerance mechanisms. Seed Science Research 9, 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Vertucci, C.W. and Berjak, P. (1991) Homeohydrous (recalcitrant) seeds: dehydration, the state of water and viability characteristics in Landolphia kirkii. Plant Physiology 96, 1093–1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pammenter, N.W., Greggains, V., Kioko, J.I., Wesley-Smith, J., Berjak, P. and Finch-Savage, W.E. (1998) Effects of differential drying rates on viability retention of recalcitrant seeds of Ekebergia capensis. Seed Science Research 8, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Berjak, P. and Walters, C. (1999) The effect of drying rate and processes leading to viability loss in recalcitrant seeds. pp. 14–24in Marzalina, M.; Khoo, K.C.; Jayanthi, N.; Tsan, F.Y.; Krishnapillay, B. (Eds) IUFRO seed symposium 1998 recalcitrant seeds. Kuala Lumpur, Forest Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar
Poulsen, K.M. and Eriksen, E.N. (1992) Physiological aspects of recalcitrance in embryonic axes of Quercus robur L. Seed Science Research 2, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, H.W. (1991) Water potential and embryonic axis viability in recalcitrant seeds of Quercus rubra. Annals of Botany 67, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, H.W. and Manger, K.R. (1998) A calorimetric perspective on desiccation stress during preservation procedures with recalcitrant seeds of Quercus robur L. Cryo-Letters 19 (suppl. 1), 23–30.Google Scholar
Pritchard, H.W., Tompsett, P.B., Manger, K. and Smidt, W.J. (1995) The effect of moisture content on the low temperature responses of Araucaria hunsteinii seeds and embryos. Annals of Botany 76, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probert, R.J. and Longley, P.L. (1989) Recalcitrant seed storage physiology in three aquatic grasses (Zizania palustris, Spartina anglica and Porteresia coarctata). Annals of Botany 63, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E.H. (1973) Predicting the storage life of seeds. Seed Science and Technology 1, 499–514.Google Scholar
Sun, W.Q. (1999a) Desiccation sensitivity of recalcitrant seeds and germinated orthodox seeds: can germinated orthodox seeds serve as a model system for studies of recalcitrance? pp. 29–42in Marzalina, M.; Khoo, K.C.; Jayanthi, N.; Tsan, F.Y.; Krishnapillay, B. (Eds) IUFRO seed symposium 1998 recalcitrant seeds. Kuala Lumpur, Forest Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar
Sun, W.Q. (1999b) Desiccation sensitivity of sixty-four tropical, subtropical and temperate recalcitrant seeds. Asian Journal of Tropical Biology 3, 9–13.Google Scholar
Sun, W.Q. (2000) Dielectric relaxation of water and waterplasticized biomolecules in relation to cellular water organization, cytoplasmic viscosity, and desiccation tolerance in recalcitrant seed tissues. Plant Physiology 124, 1203–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, W.Q. and Gouk, S.S. (1999) Preferred parameters and methods for studying moisture content of recalcitrant seeds. pp. 404–430in Marzalina, M.; Khoo, K.C.; Jayanthi, N.; Tsan, F.Y.; Krishnapillay, B. (Eds) IUFRO seed symposium 1998 recalcitrant seeds. Kuala Lumpur, Forest Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar
Sun, W.Q. and Leopold, A.C. (1993) Acquisition of desiccation tolerance in soybeans. Physiologia Plantarum 87, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompsett, P.B. and Pritchard, H.W. (1998) The effect of chilling and moisture status on the germination, desiccation tolerance and longevity of Aesculus hippocastanum L. seed. Annals of Botany 82, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertucci, C.W. and Farrant, J.M. (1995) Acquisition and loss of desiccation tolerance. pp. 237–271in Kigel, J.; Galili, G. (Eds) Seed development and germination. New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Walters, C. (1999) Levels of recalcitrance in seeds. pp. 1–13 in Marzalina, M.; Khoo, K.C.; Jayanthi, N.; Tsan, F.Y.; Krishnapillay, B. (Eds) IUFRO seed symposium 1998 recalcitrant seeds. Kuala Lumpur, Forest Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar