Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-96s6r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:42:31.410Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

Regimenting Circulation: A Case Study of Mediatization in Corporate Communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Kyung-Nan Koh*
Affiliation:
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Republic of Korea
*
Contact Kyung-Nan Koh at Semiosis Research Center, Faculty Bldg Rm. 601, Imun-ro 107, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02450, Republic of Korea (knkoh@hufs.ac.kr).

Abstract

Communication is necessary work and imagined want in corporations. Using firsthand data from a midsize corporation, this essay discusses the professional practices of corporate communication as a metadiscursive project of proleptically shaping the circulation of representations of the corporation. In corporate work, activities spoken of as “communication” are segmented and ritualized with respect to who the corporation seeks to engage in discursive and semiotic frameworks of participation and which communicative media it employs. The ways in which various communicative scenarios are imagined and framed in the design and use of corporate media are examined, as is the manner in which the boundary of the corporation’s communicative activity is drawn and (re)defined through metapragmatic regimentations of future participatory encounters. The expertise of corporate communication practitioners involves the ability to formulate the corporation as the mediatized center of the groups with which it communicates and to devise messages that target diverse groups as addressees.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Semiosis Research Centre at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am deeply grateful to Asif Agha for his tremendous generosity in helping to phrase my ideas here in not only a receivable but also a precise manner. I had the good fortune to attend a graduate seminar where he presented his conceptualization of mediatization. I then felt it curiously relevant to my own fieldwork observations; but it has taken me more than a decade to figure out how to fully apply it to the practice discussed here. This essay also benefits from comments received during the 2021 Semiotic Anthropology Conference held at the University of Pennsylvania. Last, but not least, I owe thanks to my informants—in particular, TG, KK, VP, DY, and DC.

References

Agha, Asif. 2011. “Meet Mediatization.Language & Communication 31 (3): 163–70.10.1016/j.langcom.2011.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2005. “Communication and Commodification: Global Economic Change in Sociolinguistic Perspective.” In Language, Communication and the Economy, edited by Guido Erreygers and Geert Jacobs, 9–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.16.04camCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Susanne. 2015. “The New Communication Order: Management, Language, and Morality in a Multinational Corporation.American Ethnologist 42 (2): 324–39.10.1111/amet.12133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François. 1999. “Applying Socio-Semiotics to Organizational Communication: A New Approach.Management Communication Quarterly 13 (2): 294–304.10.1177/0893318999132006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François, and James R. Taylor. 1997. “Organization as an Effect of Mediation: Redefining the Link between Organization and Communication.Communication Theory 7 (3): 219–60.10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00151.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François, Eero Vaara, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2014. Language and Communication at Work: Discourse, Narrativity, and Organizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703082.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, Joep. 2020. Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2016. “Language and Political Economy: An Afterword.HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6 (3): 331–35.10.14318/hau6.3.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graan, Andrew. 2022. “Marketing Logics and the Politics of Public Spheres: On Discursive Engineering and Enclosure.Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 32 (2): 301–25.10.1111/jola.12360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallahan, Kirk, Derina Holtzhausen, Betteke van Ruler, Dejan Verčič, and Krishnamurthy Sriramesh. 2007. “Defining Strategic Communication.International Journal of Strategic Communication 1 (1): 3–35.10.1080/15531180701285244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David. 1991. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2003. “Globalization, the New Economy, and the Commodification of Language and Identity.Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (4): 473–92.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2010. “The Commodification of Language.Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 101–14.10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica, and Alexandre Duchêne. 2012. “Pride and Profit: Changing Discourses of Language, Capital and Nation-State.” In Language in Late Capitalism: Pride and Profit, 11–31. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hooghiemstra, Reggy. 2000. “Corporate Communication and Impression Management - New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting.” Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1–2): 55–68.10.1023/A:1006400707757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Yoonhee. 2017. “‘Factory Talk’: Language Use and Power in a Korean Multinational Corporation in Indonesia.Korean Cultural Anthropology 50 (2): 237–85.Google Scholar
Koh, Kyung-Nan. 2010. “Corporate Social Responsibility and the Transformation of American Corporate Capitalism: An Ethnographic Study.” Doctoral thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Koh, Kyung-Nan. 2020. “‘Never from the Horse’s Mouth’: Glossing and Remediation in Corporate Communications.Cross-Cultural Studies: Institute of Cross-Cultural Studies, Seoul National University 26 (1): 5–34.10.17249/CCS.2020.06.26.1.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Timothy, Karen Lee Ashcraft, and François Cooren. 2019. “Introductory Essay: What Work Can Organizational Communication Do?Management Communication Quarterly 33 (1): 101–11.10.1177/0893318918809421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, and Lionel Wee. 2013. Markets of English: Linguistic Capital and Language Policy in a Globalizing World. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203120323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, Michael M. 2015. “Managing Intertextuality: Display and Discipline across Documents at a Korean Firm.” Signs and Society 3 (S1): S70–S94.10.1086/679356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 2017. “Is the Law Hopeful.” In The Economy of Hope, edited by Hirokazu Miyazaki and Richard Swedberg, 126–46. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 2008. “The Age of Responsibilization: On Market-Embedded Morality.Economy and Society 37 (1): 1–19.10.1080/03085140701760833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotta, James. 2019. “The Annotated Donald Trump: Signs of Circulation in a Time of Bubbles.Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 29 (3): 397–416.10.1111/jola.12228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1996. “From Improvement to Enhancement: An Anthropological Comment on the Audit Culture.Cambridge Anthropology 19 (3): 1–21.Google Scholar
Taylor, James R., and François Cooren. 1997. “What Makes Communication ‘Organizational’? How the Many Voices of a Collectivity Become the One Voice of an Organization.Journal of Pragmatics 27 (4): 409–38.10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00044-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trnka, Susanna, and Catherine Trundle. 2014. “Competing Responsibilities: Moving beyond Neoliberal Responsibilisation.Anthropological Forum 24 (2): 136–53.10.1080/00664677.2013.879051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urciuoli, Bonnie. 2008. “Skills and Selves in the New Workplace.American Ethnologist 35 (2): 211–28.10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00031.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Riel, Cees B. M. 1997. “Research in Corporate Communication: An Overview of an Emerging Field.Management Communication Quarterly 11 (2): 288–309.10.1177/0893318997112005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Donald K. 1997. “Perceptions of Corporate Communication as Public Relations.Corporate Communications: An International Journal 2 (4): 143–54.10.1108/eb046545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerfass, Ansgar, and Muschda Sherzada. 2015. “Corporate Communications from the CEO’s Perspective.Corporate Communications: An International Journal 20 (3): 291–309.10.1108/CCIJ-04-2014-0020CrossRefGoogle Scholar