Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:18:38.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stories States Tell: Identity, Narrative, and Human Rights in the Balkans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jelena Subotić
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jelena Subotić explores how the states of the Balkans construct their “autobiographies“—stories about themselves—and how these stories influence their contemporary political choices. By understanding where states’ narratives about themselves—stories of their past, their historical purpose, their role in the international system—come from, we can more fully explain contemporary state behavior that to outsiders may seem irrational, self-defeating, or simply, inexplicable. Subotić specifically addresses ways in which states of the western Balkans have built their state narratives around the issue of human rights. She explores, first, how a particular narrative of state and national identity produced—or made locally comprehensible—massive human rights abuses. She then analyzes why contemporary identity narratives make postconflict human rights policies very difficult to institutionalize. The article focuses specifically on the human rights discourse, practices, and debates in Serbia and Croatia.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , Summer 2013 , pp. 306 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Andrews, Molly, Squire, Corinne, and Tambokou, Maria, eds., Doing Narrative Research (London, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Josselson, Ruthellen, “Narrative Research and the Challenge of Accumulating Knowledge,” Narrative-State of the Art, special issue of Narrative Inquiry 16, no. 1 (2006): 3–10.Google Scholar

3. Trahar, Sheila, “Beyond the Story Itself: Narrative Inquiry and Autoethnography in Intercultural Research in Higher Education,” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 10, no. 1 (10 January 2009), at www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/121 8 (last accessed 1 March 2013).Google Scholar

4. Riessman, Catherine Kohler, Narrative Analysis (Newbury Park, 1993).Google Scholar

5. Stern, Steve J., Remembering Pinochet's Chile: On the Eve of London, 1998 (Durham, 2004), 114.Google Scholar

6. Warburg, Bettina, “Germany's National Identity, Collective Memory, and Role Abroad,'’ in Langenbacher, Eric and Shain, Yossi, eds., Power and the Past: Collective Memory and International Relations (Washington, D.C., 2010), 53.Google Scholar

7. Krebs, Ronald R. and Lobasz, Jennifer K., “Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq,” Security Studies 16, no. 3 (July 2007): 412–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Andrews, Molly, “Grand National Narratives and the Project of Truth Commissions: A Comparative Analysis,” Media, Culture and Society 25, no. 1(January 2003): 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Wertsch, James V., Voices of Collective Remembering (Cambridge, Eng., 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Mendeloff, David, ‘“Pernicious History’ as a Cause of National Misperceptions,“ Cooperation and Conjlict 43, no. 1(March 2008): 32.Google Scholar

11. Thelen, David, “Memory and American History,” Journal of American History 75, no. 4 (March 1989): 1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Katzenstein, Peter J., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York, 1996);Google Scholar Hopf, Ted, Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999 (Ithaca, 2002);Google Scholar Sylvan, Donald A. and Haddad, Deborah M., “Reasoning and Problem Representation in Foreign Policy: Groups, Individuals and Stories,'’ in Sylvan, Donald A. and Voss, James F., eds., Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision-Making (Cambridge, Eng., 1998).Google Scholar For an overview of the promise of constructivist international relations scholarship, see Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 4 (June 2001): 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. Kaufmann, Chaim, “Threat lnflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War,” International Security 29, no. 1(Summer 2004): 5–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Eric Langenbacher, “Collective Memory as a Factor in Political Culture and International Relations,” in Langenbacher and Shain, eds., Power and the Past, 19.Google Scholar

15. Katzenstein, Culture of National Security; also Welch, David, “Culture and Emotion as Obstacles to Good Judgment: The Case of Argentina's Invasion of the Falklands/ Malvinas,” in Renshon, Stanley A. and Larson, Deborah Welch, eds., Good Judgment in Foreign Policy: Theory and Application (Lanham, Md., 2002);Google Scholar Soeya, Yoshihide, Tadokoro, Masayuki, and Welch, David A., Japan as a “Normal Country“? A Nation in Search of Its Place in the World (Toronto, 2011);Google Scholar Berger, Thomas U., Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and fapan (Baltimore, 1998).Google Scholar

16. Krebs and Lobasz, “Fixing the Meaning of 9/11,” 410.

17. Subotić, Jelena, “Europe Is a State of Mind: Identity and Europeanization in the Balkans,” International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 2 (June 2011): 309–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Langenbacher, Eric, “Changing Memory Regimes in Contemporary Germany?“ German Politics and Society 21, no. 2 (Summer 2003): 46–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19. Kolsto, Pal, “Bleiburg: The Creation of a National Martyrology,” Europe-Asia Studies 62, no. 7 (September 2010): 1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Čolović, Ivan, The Politics of Symbol in Serbia: Essays in Political Anthropology, trans. from Serbian by Hawkesworth, Celia (London, 2002).Google Scholar

21. Popov, Nebojša, The Road to Warin Serbia: Trauma and Catharsis (Budapest, 2000);Google Scholar Dragović-Soso, Jasna, “Saviours of the Nation“: Serbia's Intellectual Opposition and the Revival of Nationalism (London, 2002).Google Scholar

22. Ramet, Sabrina P., “The Denial Syndrome and Its Consequences: Serbian Political Culture since 2000,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40, no. 1 (March 2007): 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. B92, 6 October 2000. Emphasis added .

24. Popov, Road to War in Serbia; Dimitrijević, Nenad, “Serbia after the Criminal Past: What Went Wrong and What Should Be Đone,” International Journal of Transitional Justice 2, no. 1(March 2008): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25. Since 1990, the progressive members of parliament from the Civic Alliance, Social Democratic Union, and the Liberal Democratic Party never held more than ten seats.

26. Mendeloff, “'Pernicious History,“’ 37.

27. Ibid., 37-38.

28. As instruments of nation building, see Hopken, Wolfgang, “Between Civic Identity and Nationalism,” in Ramet, Sabrina P. and Matić, Davorka, eds., Democratic Transition in Croatia: Value Transformation, Education and Media (College Station, 2007), 163–92.Google Scholar As memories of the past, see Stojanović, Dubravka, “Eksplozivna naprava s odloženim dejstvom: Slika ratova 90-ih u srpskim udžbenicima istorije (1993-2005),” in Cipek, Tihomir, ed., Kultura sjećan ja: 1991.-Povijesni lomovi i svladavanje prošlosti (Zagreb, 2011).Google Scholar

29. Stojanović, “Eksplozivna naprava s odloženim dejstvom,” 344.

30. Quoted ibid., 355.

31. Ibid.

32. Ibid.

33. For the description “national patriots,” see Hopken, “Between Civic Identity and Nationalism,” 184. For the phrasing “anti-fascist movement from the right,” see Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, Human Rights Reflect Institutional Impotence (Belgrade, 2011), 27.

34. Byford, Jovan, “The Willing Bystanders: Dimitrije Ljotić, ‘Shield Collaboration’ and the Destruction of Serbia's Jews,” in Haynes, Rebecca and Rady, Martyn, eds” In the Shadow of Hitler: Personalities of the Right in CentraI and Eastern Europe (London, 2011).Google Scholar

35. Both claims are patently false and are consistently repudiated by scholarly work, such as Byford, Jovan, “'Serbs Never Hated the Jews': The Denial of Antisemitism in Serbian Orthodox Christian Culture,” Patterns of Prejudice 40, no. 2 (May 2006): 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36. Cited in Byford, Jovan, “When I Say ‘The Holocaust,’ I Mean ‘Jasenovac,'” East European Jewish Affairs 37, no. 1(April 2007): 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, Human Rights. Mihajlović was officially rehabilitated by the High Court in Belgrade on 23 March 2012.

38. Srdjan Milošević, “Rehabilitacija kneza Pavla: Zbir netačnih podataka ipogrešnih tumačenja,'’ Peščanik, 6 October 2012, at pescanik.net/2012/10/rehabilitacija-kneza-pavla/ (last accessed 1 March 2013); Dubravka Stojanović, “Jajinci nad Oplencem,'’ Peščanik (12 October 2012), at pescanik.net/2012/10/ jajinci-pod-oplencem/ (last accessed 1 March 2013).

39. Judah, Tim, “Milošević on Trial,” Survival 44, no. 2 ﹛2002): 157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40. Ramet, “Denial Syndrome,“

41. Pintar, Olga Manojlović, “Rat i nemir,” in Stojanović, Dubravka et al., ed., Novosti iz prošlosti: Znanje, neznanje, upotreba i zloupotreba istorije (Belgrade, 2010), 97.Google Scholar

42. As quoted in Biserko, Sonja, “Osvetićemo se Turcima,” Helsinškapovelja (January February 2006): 3.Google Scholar

43. McMahon, Patrice C. and Forsythe, David P., “The ICTY's Impact on Serbia: Judicial Romanticism Meets Network Politics,” Human Rights Quarterly 30, no. 2 (May 2008): 412–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44. B92, 22 July 2008.

45. B92, 20 July 2011.

46. Available at www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/archive/files/lat/pdf/ostala_akta/ 2010/Deklaracijao/o20oo/o20Srebrenicio/o20lat.zip (last accessed 1March 2013).

47. Cohen, Stanley, States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Sujfering (Cambridge, Eng., 2001).Google Scholar Another example of interpretive denial of the Srebrenica genocide is the shift in the focus of denial within Serbian intellectual discourse. The events at Srebrenica used to be denied flat out; now they are grudgingly accepted as “real,” but the number of victims is now dramatically lowered in most of the media reports. Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, Human Rights.

48. Subotić, Jelena, “Expanding the Scope of Postconflict Justice: Individual, State and Societal Responsibility for Mass Atrocity,” Journal of Peace Research 48, no. 2 (March 2011): 157–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49. Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, Human Rights.

50. Tijana M. Č ajetinac, “Deklaracija o Srebrenici-još jedno simboličko ubistvo,” Peščanik (14 April 2010), at pescanik.net/2010/04/deklaracija-o-srebrenici-o/oE2o/o80o/o93- jos-jedno-simbolicko-ubistvo/ (last accessed 1March 2013).

51. Bartlett, William, Croatia: Between Europe and the Balkans (London, 2003).Google Scholar

52. Tudjman, Franjo, Address of the President of the Republic of Croatia on the State of the Nation (Zagreb, 27 January 1998).Google Scholar

53. Goldstein, Ivo and Goldstein, Slavko, Holokaust u Zagrebu (Zagreb, 2001).Google Scholar

54. Bellamy, Alex J., The Formation of Croatian National Identity: A Centuries-Old Dream (Manchester, Eng., 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55. Hedl, Drago, “Living in the Past: Franjo Tudjman's Croatia,” Current History 99, no. 635 (March 2000): 104–9.Google Scholar

56. Greenberg, Robert D., Language and Identity in the Balkans: Serbo-Croatian and lts Disintegration (Oxford, 2004).Google Scholar

57. Croatian Ministry of Education and Sports, The Development of Education: The National Report (Zagreb, 1999).

58. In 2000, after Tudjman's death and bis replacement by Stjepan Mesić, the city of Zagreb returned the original name to the square.

59. For a thorough analysis of claims of genocide in the former Yugoslavia during World War II and the war of the 1990s, see Hoare, Marko Attila, “Genocide in the Former Yugoslavia before and after Communism,” Europe-Asia Studies 62, no. 7 (September 2010): 1193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60. Pavlaković, Vjeran, Red Stars, Black Shirts: Symbols, Commemorations, and Contested Histories of World War 1\vo in Croatia (Seattle, 2008).Google Scholar

61. Kolsto, “Bleiburg.”

62. Ibid., 1163.

63. Goldstein, Ivo, “O udžbenicima povijesti u Hrvatskoj,” Dijalog povjesničara IIstoričara 3(2001): 15–28.Google Scholar

64. Hopken, “Between Civic Identity and Nationalism.“

65. Agičić, Damir, “Slika naroda jugoistočne Europe u hrvatskim udžbenicima povijesti za osnovnu školu,” Radovi-Zavod za hrvatsku povijest, no. 31(1998): 205–15.Google Scholar

66. Quoted ibid.

67. Quoted in Damir Agičić, “Prikaz postanka suvremene Republike Hrvatske u hrvatskim udžbenicima,” in Cipek, ed., Kultura sjećan ja: 1991, 365.

68. Magdalena Najbar-Agičić and Damir Agičić, “History Teaching in 1990s Croatia,” in Ramet and Matić, eds., Democratic Transition in Croatia.

69. Ibid., 204.

70. Ibid.

71. Ibid.

72. Agičić, , “Prikaz postanka,” 361–62.Google Scholar

73. Ibid., 362.

74. Lindstrom, Nicole, “Between Europe and the Balkans: Mapping Slovenia and Croatia's ‘Return to Europe’ in the 1990s,” Dialectical Anthropology 27 (September 2003): 317.Google Scholar

75. Subotić, “Europe Is a State of Mind.“

76. Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, Military Operation “Storm” and Its Aftermath (Zagreb, 1999).

77. Quoted in Snježana Koren, “Korisna prošlost?” in Cipek, ed., Kultura sjećanja:1991,135.

78. Hrvatski Sabor, “Deklaracija o domovinskom ratu,” Narodne novine 102 (2000).

79. Ibid.

80. Hrvatski Sabor, “Deklaracija o Oluji,” Narodne novine 76 (2006).

81. An opinion poli in 2002 showed that as many as 71 percent of Croats were opposed to ICTY indictments of Croatian generals. Jutarnji list, 24 September 2002.

82. Subotić, “Europe Is a State of Mind.“

83. BBC News, 8 July 2001.

84. Quoted in Subotić, “Europe Is a State of Mind,” 318.

85. Novi list, 3 July 2004.

86. Subotić, Jelena, Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans (Ithaca, 2009).Google Scholar

87. International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Appeals Judgment in Prosecutor versus Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač (The Hague, 2012).

88. A local court bas since declared the state of Croatia responsible for the murder of an elderly Serbian civilian couple in the aftermath of Operation Storm and ordered compensation. Boris Pavelić, “Croatian Court: State Responsible for Serbs’ Murder,” Balkan In-sight, 24 January 2013, at www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/croatian-court-procclaimsstate-responsible-for-killed-serbs (last accessed 1March 2013).