Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:57:36.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Has Social Policy Expansion in Latin America Reduced Welfare Decommodification and Defamilialisation? Evidence from an Overview of the Mexican Welfare Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2020

Ricardo Velázquez Leyer*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Political Sciences, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico E-mail: ricardo.velazquez@ibero.mx

Abstract

Mexican social policy has been transformed in recent years with the introduction and expansion of social assistance programmes, causing a diversion from the trajectory based on social insurance since the first decades of the twentieth century. This article aims to understand the outcomes of that transformation, by applying welfare regime theory to establish how social policy reforms have affected the distribution of welfare responsibilities among the state, markets and families. The research identifies (de)commodification and (de)familialisation outcomes of policy changes in pensions, healthcare, unemployment and family support. Results suggest that the expansion has not produced significant reductions in decommodification or defamilialisation because of: a) the explicit or implicit role assigned to markets in policy design and implementation, and b) the reliance of the process of economic liberalisation on the welfare role performed by families. The case of Mexico may illustrate the current welfare challenges faced by societies across Latin America.

Type
Themed Section: Global Welfare Regimes Revisited
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arriagada, I. (ed) (2007) Familias y políticas públicas en América Latina: una historia de desencuentros, Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Auyero, J. and Benzecry, C. (2016) ‘La lógica práctica del dominio clientelista’, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. LXI, 226, 221–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambra, C. (2005) ‘Cash versus services: ‘Worlds of Welfare’ and the decommodification of cash benefits and health care services’, Journal of Social Policy, 34, 2, 195213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barba, C. (2006) ‘La reforma social y el regimen de bienestar mexicano’, in Franco, R. and Lanzaro, J. (eds.), Politica y politicas publicas en los procesos de reforma de America Latina, Buenos Aires, Argentina: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Barba, C. (2016) ‘Las propuestas de reforma y las nuevas estrategias sociales del gobierno de Enrique Peña Nieto. ¿Cambio de rumbo en la política social mexicana?’, in Valencia, E. and Oróñez, G. (eds.), Nueva ronda de reformas estruturales en México. ¿Nuevas políticas sociales?, Tijuana: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 85122.Google Scholar
Barba, C. and Valencia, E. (2013) ‘La transición del régimen de bienestar mexicano: entre el dualismo y las reformas liberales’, Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 22, 2, 4775.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2004) ‘Latin America: towards a liberal-informal welfare regime’, in Gough, I. and Wood, G. (eds.), Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 121168.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2009) ‘Labour markets and the (hyphenated) welfare regime in Latin America’, Economy and Society, 38, 87108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2019) ‘Welfare and social protection in contemporary Latin America’, in Cruz-Martínez, G. (ed.), Welfare and Social Protection in Contemporary Latin America, London: Routledge, 5971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayón, M. C. (2009) ‘Persistencia de un modelo social excluyente en México’, Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 128, 3, 331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. (2010) What is Social Policy?, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Borges Sugiyama, N. (2011) ‘The diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfer programs in the Americas’, Global Social Policy, 11, 23, 250–78.Google Scholar
CESOP (2014) Encuesta sobre: La calidad del trabajo en México, Centro de Estudios Sociales y de Opinón Pública.Google Scholar
CESOP (2017) La calidad en los servicios de salud de México, Documento de trabajo núm. 269, Centro de Estudios Sociales y de Opinión Pública.Google Scholar
CIDE (2017) Diagnóstico sobre el problema público en materia de cuidados en México, Documento de trabajo, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.Google Scholar
CONAPO (2019) Proyecciones de la Población de México y de las Entidades Federativas 2016-2050 y Conciliación Demográfica de México, 1950-2015, Consejo Nacional de Población, https://www.gob.mx/conapo/acciones-y-programas/conciliacion-demografica-de-mexico-1950-2015-y-proyecciones-de-la-poblacion-de-mexico-y-de-las-entidades-federativas-2016-2050 [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
CONASAMI (2019) Tabla de Salarios Mínimos Generales y Profesionales por Áreas Geográficas, Comisión Nacional de Salarios Mínimos, https://www.gob.mx/conasami/documentos/tabla-de-salarios-minimos-generales-y-profesionales-por-areas-geograficas?idiom=es [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
CONEVAL (2019) Líneas de pobreza por ingresos, Comisión Nacional de Evaluación de la Política Social, http://sistemas.coneval.org.mx/InfoPobreza/Pages/wfrLineaBienestar?pAnioInicio=2016&pTipoIndicador=0 [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
Cruz-Martínez, G. (ed.) (2019) Welfare and Social Protection in Contemporary Latin America, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, M. (2010) Workers and Welfare: Comparative Institutional Change in Twentieth-Century Mexico, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filgueira, F. (1998) ‘El nuevo modelo de prestaciones sociales en América Latina: residualismo y ciudadanía estratificada’, in Roberts, B. (ed.), Ciudadania y Politica Social, San José: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Filgueira, F. (2005) ‘Welfare and Democracy in Latin America: the Development, Crises and Aftermath of Universal, Dual and Exclusionary Social States’, Project on Social Policy and Democratization, Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
Frenk, J., González Pier, E., Lezana, M. and Knaul, F.M. (2006) ‘Comprehensive reform to improve health system performance in Mexico’, Lancet, 368, 1524–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, B. and Lavinas, L. (2015) A Moment of Equality for Latin America?: Challenges for Redistribution, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garay, C. (2017) Social Policy Expansion in Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerhard, R. (2013) Servicios públicos de cuidado infantil en México: una propuesta para medir su calidad, México, D.F.: CLEAR-CIDE.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2016) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingrich, J. (2015) ‘Coalitions, policies and distribution: Esping-Andersen’s Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism’, in Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds.), Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. (2013) ‘Social policy regimes in the developing world’, in Kennett, P. (ed.), A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 205–24.Google Scholar
Gough, I. and Wood, G. (2004) Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratius, S. and Rivero, A. (2018) ‘Más allá de la izquierda y la derecha: populismo en Europa y América Latina’, Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 119, 3561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, C. (1999) The Hidden Welfare State. Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. (2012) Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huesca Reynoso, L. and Velázquez Leyer, R. (2019) ‘Contradictions from the left: the residual social policy strategy of the new Mexican government’, Social Policy Association 50th Anniversary Blog Series, http://www.social-policy.org.uk/50-for-50/contradictions-mexico/ [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
ILO (2019) ILOSTAT Data: Unemployment Rate, International Labour Organisation, https://www.ilo.org/shinyapps/bulkexplorer18/?lang=en&segment=indicator&id=SDG_0852_SEX_AGE_RT_A [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
INEE (2018) Panorama Educativo de México. Indicadores del Sistema Educativo Nacional 2017, Ciudad de México: Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.Google Scholar
ISSSTE (1982) Law of the State Workers’ Social Security and Services Institute 1982, México, DF: Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales para los Trabajadores del Estado.Google Scholar
ISSSTE (2007) Law of the State Workers’ Social Security and Services Institute 2007, México, DF: Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales para los Trabajadores del Estado.Google Scholar
IMSS (1973) Social Insurance Law 1973, México, DF: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.Google Scholar
IMSS (1997) Social Insurance Law 1997, México, DF: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.Google Scholar
INEGI (2019a) Encuesta Nacional de Empleo y Seguridad Social (ENESS), Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística, https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/eness/2017/ [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
INEGI (2019b) Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo (ENOE), Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística, https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enoe/15ymas/ [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
INEGI (2019c) Encuesta Nacional de Ingreso y Gasto de los Hogares (ENIGH), Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística, https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enigh/nc/2018/ [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
INEGI (2019d) Censo de Población y Vivienda, Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística, https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2020/ [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
Krozer, A., Moreno Brid, J. C. and Rubio Badan, J. C. (2015) ‘Inequality and minimum wage policy: not even talking, much less walking in Mexico’, Investigación Económica, LXXIV, 293, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavinas, L. (2013) ‘21st century welfare’, New Left Review, 84.Google Scholar
Levy, S. (2008) Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes. Social Policy, Informality and Economic Growth in Mexico, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Lindvall, J. and Rueda, D. (2014) ‘The insider-outsider dilemma’, British Journal of Political Science, 44, 2, 460–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López Calva, L. F. and Lustig, N. (eds.) (2011) La disminución de la desigualdad en la América Latina. ¿Un decenio de progreso?, México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Martínez Franzoni, J. (2008) ‘Welfare regimes in Latin America: capturing constellations of markets, families, and policies’, Latin American Politics and Society, 50, 67100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Franzoni, J. and Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2016) The Quest for Universal Social Policy in the South, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesa-Lago, C. (1986) ‘Seguridad social y desarrollo en América Latina’, Revista de la CEPAL, 28, 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molyneux, M. (2006) ‘Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional transfer programme’, Social Policy and Administration, 40, 4, 425–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2015) OECD Reviews of Pension Systems: Mexico, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2016) OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Mexico, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Ordóñez Barba, G. and Ramírez Sánchez, M. A. (2018) ‘Cobertura universal de salud y fragmentación del sistema mexicano’, in Campillo, C., Rangel, J. M. and Servín, B. (eds.), La política social en México en tiempos de desigualdad. La desigualdad y su impacto macrosocial, Monterrey: UANL, 129–48.Google Scholar
Palier, B. and Thelen, K. (2010) ‘Institutionalizing dualism: complementarities and change in France and Germany’, Politics and Society, 38, 1, 119–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, T. and Roumpakis, A. (2013) ‘Familistic welfare capitalism in crisis: social reproduction and anti-social policy in Greece’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 29, 3, 204–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, T. and Roumpakis, A. (2019) ‘Family as a socioeconomic actor in the political economy of welfare’, Social Policy Review 31, 243–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. and Barrientos, A. (2011) ‘An audit of the welfare modelling buisness’, Social Policy and Administration, 45, 1, 6984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presidency (2011) Quinto Informe de Gobierno 2010–2011, Anexo Estadístico, México, DF: Presidencia de la República.Google Scholar
Presidency (2017) Quinto Informe de Gobierno 2016–2017, Anexo Estadístico, México, DF: Presidencia de la República.Google Scholar
Presidency (2018) Sexto Informe de Gobierno 2017–2018, Anexo Estadístico, México, DF: Presidencia de la República.Google Scholar
Ramírez López, B. (2016) ‘La seguridad social y la pensión universal’, in Valencia, E. and Oróñez, G. (eds.), Nueva ronda de reformas estruturales en México. ¿Nuevas políticas sociales?, Tijuana: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 259–76.Google Scholar
Reygadas, L. and Filgueira, F. (2010) ‘Inequality and the incorporation crisis: the left’s social policy toolkit’, in Cameron, M. and Hershberg, E. (eds.) Latin America’s Left Turns: Politics, Policies and Trajectories of Change, London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Rudra, N. (2007) ‘Welfare states in developing countries: unique or universal?’, The Journal of Politics, 69, 2, 378–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (ed.) (1999) Gender and Welfare State Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraceno, C. (1996) ‘Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare’, Paper presented at the OECD high level conference Beyond 2000: The New Social Policy Agenda. Paris, 12-13 November.Google Scholar
SHCP (2002) Income Tax Law 2002, México, DF: Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público.Google Scholar
Sinclair, S. (2016) Social Policy Analysis. Illuminating Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubasart-González, G. and Minteguiaga, A. (2017) ‘Esping-Andersen en América Latina: El estudio de los regímenes de bienestar’, Política y gobierno, XXIV, 1, 213–36.Google Scholar
UVM (2019) Encuesta Nacional de Egresados, Universidad del Valle de México, https://opinionpublicauvm.mx/estudios/encuesta-nacional-de-egresados-2019 [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
Vargas Bustamante, A. and Méndez, C. (2014) ‘Health care privatization in Latin America: comparing divergent privatization approaches in Chile, Colombia and Mexico’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 39, 4, 841–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velázquez Leyer, R. (2015a) ‘The development of housing in Mexico: a welfare regime approach’, Social Policy and Society, 14, 4, 523–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velázquez Leyer, R. (2015b) Who Got What from Social Policy Reforms in Mexico? The Redistributive Potential of Changes in the Tax/Benefit System Between 1994 and 2012, PhD Thesis, University of Bath, United Kingdom, at https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/187958770/VELAZQUEZ_LEYER_Ricardo_PhD_Thesis.pdf [accessed 09.06.2020].Google Scholar
Velázquez Leyer, R. (2019) ‘Aiming to keep poor Mexican families on the breadline (but no higher): the effects of minimum wage, tax and social policy between 1994 and 2012’, Social Policy and Administration, 56, 5, 743–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (2019) Health Data and Statistics, World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/en/.Google Scholar
Zurita, B. and Ramírez, T. (2003) ‘Desempeño del sector privado de la salud en México’, in Frenk, J. (ed.), Caleidoscopio de la salud. De la investigación a las políticas y de las políticas a la acción, México, D.F.: FUNSALUD, 153–62.Google Scholar