Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:29:01.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Market Forces: Defining the Adoptable Child, 1860–1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2012

Shurlee Swain
Shurlee Swain*
Affiliation:
School of Arts and Sciences, Australian Catholic University E-mail: shurlee.swain@acu.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Discomfort about the notion of adoption as facilitating a market in children has been one of the major motivations for regulation and control, not only for intercountry adoption but throughout the history of in country adoption as well. This paper explores the nature of the market in Australia, beginning in the decades before legalisation but looking also for continuities in the ways in which in country and later intercountry adoptions have been debated. Drawing on an analysis of advertisements from major metropolitan and regional newspapers it argues that benevolence always exists in an uneasy alliance with assumptions about the right to a child, creating a ‘shopping list’ of desired characteristics which the market has rarely been able to satisfy.

Keywords

Adoptionadoption historyadoption legislationnewspaper advertisementsmarket in children
Type
Themed Section on Waiting for a Better World: Critical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Intercountry Adoption
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 399 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berebitsky, J. (1994) ‘“To raise as your own”: the growth of legal adoption in Washington’, Washington History, 6, 1, 5–26.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, D., Spark, C., and Murphy, K. (2009) ‘“That was then, but this is now”: historical perspectives on intercountry and domestic child adoption in Australian public policy’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 23, 3, 427–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, F. R. (1953) ‘Adoption: a social problem unsolved’, Marriage and Family Living, 15, 4, 292–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2009) ‘Heterosexual, lesbian and gay preadoptive parents’ preferences about child gender’, Sex Roles, 61, 1–2, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravois, J. (2004) ‘Bringing up babes: why do adoptive parents prefer girls?’, http://www.slate.com/id/2093899 [accessed 06.10.2011].Google Scholar
Haebich, A. (2000) Broken Circles, Fremantle: Fremantle Arts Centre Press.Google Scholar
Herman, E. (2008) Kinship by Design: A History of Adoption in the Modern United States, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melosh, B. (2002) Strangers and Kin: The American Way of Adoption, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, K. (2004) ‘Governing “unwed mothers” in Toronto at the turn of the twentieth century’, Canadian Historical Review, 85, 2, 253–76.Google Scholar
Prichard, J. R. (1984) ‘A market for babies?’, The University of Toronto Law Journal, 34, 3, 341–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, S. and Howe, R. (1995) Single Mothers and Their Children: Disposal, Punishment and Survival in Australia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
The Argus (1929) ‘Child welfare work’, 26 November, 17, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article4052596 [accessed 05.10.2011].Google Scholar
The Argus (1941) ‘Fewer foundlings for adoption’, 19 June, 8, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article8167778 [accessed 10.01.2012].Google Scholar
The Brisbane Courier (1881) ‘The children of the State in South Australia’, 23 November, 6, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article915507 [accessed 5.10.2011].Google Scholar
The Brisbane Courier (1914) ‘Who will take an orphan’, 29 September, 7, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article19986519 [accessed 05.10.2011].Google Scholar
The Courier-Mail (1940) ‘Advertising’, 27 December, 12, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article44907006 [accessed 10.01.2012].Google Scholar
The Register (1917) ‘That “French” boy’, 23 June, 6, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article59147680 [accessed 06.10.2011].Google Scholar
The Sydney Morning Herald (1860) ‘Advertising’, 3 April, 8, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article13038689 [accessed 10.01.2012].Google Scholar
The West Australian (1929) ‘Babies for the childless’, 22 August, 14, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article32305470 [accessed 05.10.2011].Google Scholar
Townsville Daily Bulletin (1935) ‘Advertising’, 26, 27, 28 November, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13 December, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article [accessed 10.01.2012].Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. (1985) Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children, Cambridge, MA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar