Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:51:17.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inventing Industrial Accidents and Their Insurance: Discourse and Workers’ Compensation in the United States, 1880s–1910s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Julian Go III
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For an industrial worker in late-nineteenth-century America who lost a limb or an eye from a precariously assembled piece of machinery or who suffered some other work injury, compensation could be attained only through litigation. But under the common law, the courts assumed that workers who found themselves in dangerous work situations had the freedom to leave and find employment elsewhere. If they chose not to leave and were injured, the employer was not to blame legally. The doctrine of “assumed risk,” one of three “employers’ defenses,” made it difficult for a worker to win compensation. Only when an injured worker could prove that the employer had directly caused the accident and had done so alone was payment awarded (Downey 1912: 11–13).

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , Fall 1996 , pp. 401 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew, and DeViney, Stanley (1992) “The welfare state as transnational event: Evidence from sequences of policy adoption.” Social Science History 16: 245-74.Google Scholar
Abrams, Philip (1988) “Notes on the difficulty of studying the state (1977).” Journal of Historical Sociology 1: 58–89.Google Scholar
Alger, George W. (1901) “The courts and factory legislation.” American Journal of Sociology 6: 396–406.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin (1993) “The state of the art in welfare state research on social spending efforts in capitalist democracies since 1960.” American Journal of Sociology 99: 750-63.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, Clemens, Elisabeth S., Olsen, Jefren, Parikh, Sunita, and Skocpol, Theda (1987) “The political origins of unemployment insurance in five American states.” Studies in American Political Development 2: 137-82.Google Scholar
American Association for Labor Legislation (1908) Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
American Federation of Labor (1905) Report of Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Convention. Washington, DC: Law Reporter.Google Scholar
American Federation of Labor (1910) Report of Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Convention. Washington, DC: Law Reporter.Google Scholar
American Federation of Labor (1911a) Report of Proceedings of the Thirty-first Annual Convention. Washington, DC: Law Reporter.Google Scholar
American Federation of Labor (1911b) Weekly Newsletter, 17 June.Google Scholar
American Federationist (1895-1912).Google Scholar
Aminzade, Ronald (1993) Ballots and Barricades: Class Formation and Republican Politics in France, 1830-1871. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Robert (1969) “Business and workers’ welfare in the Progressive Era: Workmen’s compensation reform in Massachusetts, 1880-1911.” Business History Review 43: 452-75.Google Scholar
Asher, Robert (1971) Workmen’s Compensation in the United States, 1880-1935. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.Google Scholar
Asher, Robert (1973) “Radicalism and reform: State insurance of workmen’s compensation in Minnesota, 1910-1930.” Labor History 14: 19–41.Google Scholar
Asher, Robert (1973-74) “The 1911 Wisconsin Workmen’s Compensation Law: A study in conservative labor reform.” Wisconsin Magazine of History 57: 123-40.Google Scholar
Asher, Robert (1982) “The ignored precedent: Samuel Gompers and workmen’s compensa tion.” New Labor Review 4: 51–77.Google Scholar
Asher, Robert (1983) “Failure and fulfillment: Agitation for employers’ liability legislation and the origins of workmen’s compensation in New York State, 1876-1910.” Labor History 24:198–222.Google Scholar
Asher, Robert (1991) “Connecticut’s first workmen’s compensation law.” Connecticut History 32: 25–50.Google Scholar
Bale, Anthony (1987) Compensation Crisis: The Value and Meaning of Work-Related Injuries in the United States, 1842-1932. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.Google Scholar
Beckner, Earl R. (1929) A History of Labor Legislation in Illinois. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D. (1993) “Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement.” Social Forces 71: 676–701.Google Scholar
Berman, Daniel M. (1978) Death on the Job: Occupational Health and Safety Struggles in the United States. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
Bigham, Truman C. (1925) “The Chicago Federation of Labor.” Diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bogardus, Emory S. (1911) “The relation of fatigue to industrial accidents.” American Journal of Sociology 17: 206-22.Google Scholar
Boyd, James H. (1913) Workmen’s Compensation and Industrial Insurance under Modern Conditions. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Brooks, John Graham (1903) The Social Unrest. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bruce, Robert V. (1959) 1877: Year of Violence. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Buder, Stanley (1967) Pullman: An Experiment in Industrial Order and Community Planning, 1880-1930. Urban Life in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Gilbert Lewis (1911) Industrial Accidents and Their Compensation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Carroll, Mollie Ray (1923) Labor and Politics: The Attitude of the American Federation of Labor toward Legislation and Politics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Castrovinci, Joseph L. (1976) “Prelude to welfare capitalism: The role of business in the enactment of workmen’s compensation in Illinois, 1905-1912.” Social Service Review 50: 80–102.Google Scholar
Chicago Federation of Labor (1910-15) Minutes of meetings. Microfilm roll 3, December 3, 1911–July 7, 1913. Chicago Historical Society.Google Scholar
Clark, Lindley (1908) “The legal liability of employers for injuries to their employees in the United States.” Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of Labor 16: 1–120.Google Scholar
Conference of Commissions on Compensation for Industrial Accidents (1910) Proceedings. Boston: Geo H. Ellis.Google Scholar
Consumer’s League of New York City (1899-1913) Reports.Google Scholar
Detroit Free Press (1911).Google Scholar
Detroit News (1911-12).Google Scholar
Devine, Edward (1909) Misery and Its Causes. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank (1992) “Metaphors of industrial rationality,” in Wuthnow, Robert (ed.) Vocabularies of Public Life: Empirical Essays in Symbolic Structure. London: Routledge: 185–206.Google Scholar
Dodd, Walter F. (1936) Administration of Workmen’s Compensation. New York: Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
Domhoff, William G. (1979) The Powers That Be: Processes of Ruling-Class Domination in America. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Downey, E. H. (1912) History of Work Indemnity in Iowa. Iowa City: State Historical Society of Iowa.Google Scholar
Eastman, Crystal (1909) “The American way of distributing industrial accident losses.” Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the American Association for Labor Legislation: 2: 433-58.Google Scholar
Eastman, Crystal (1910a) Work Accidents and the Law. New York: Survey Associates.Google Scholar
Eastman, Crystal (1910b) “Work accidents and employers’ liability.” Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections 37: 414-24.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ewald, François (1991) “Insurance and risk,” in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 197–210.Google Scholar
Fall, Charles G. (1889) Employer’s Liability for Personal Injuries to Their Employees. Boston: Wright and Potter.Google Scholar
Fetter, Frank A. (1906) “The need of industrial insurance.” Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections 33: 464-70.Google Scholar
Fisher, Walter R. (1984) “Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument.” Communication Monographs 51: 1–23.Google Scholar
Foner, Philip S. (1964) History of the Labor Movement in the United States. Vol. 3, The Policies and Practices of the American Federation of Labor, 1900-1909. New York: International.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence, and Ladinsky, Jack (1978) “Social change and the law of industrial accidents,” in Friedman, Lawrence and Scheiber, Harry (eds.) American Law and the Constitutional Order: Historical Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 269-82.Google Scholar
Go, Julian III, (1993) “Reconsidering the political-institutional approach: Political learning, political culture, and the U.S. welfare state.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gompers, Samuel (1900) “What does labor want?” in Illustrated History of the Baltimore Federation of Labor and Its Affiliated Organizations. Baltimore, MD: Allied: 295–315.Google Scholar
Gompers, Samuel (1911) “Employers’ liability-compensation.” American Federationist 18: 297-99.Google Scholar
Gompers, Samuel (1920) Labor and the Employer. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Greely, Louis M. (1910) “The changing attitude of the courts toward social legislation.” Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections 37: 391–405.Google Scholar
Green, Marguerite (1956) The National Civic Federation and the American Labor Movement, 1900-1925. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart (1988) The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Hard, William (1908) “The law of the killed and wounded.” Everybody’s Magazine 19: 361-71.Google Scholar
Hard, William (1910) Injured in the Course of Duty. Chicago: Ridgeway.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L. (1977) The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hattam, Victoria C. (1993) Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States. Princeton Studies in American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, Charles Richmond (1907a) “Industrial insurance v. the employer’s liability law.” American Journal of Sociology 13: 183-99.Google Scholar
Henderson, Charles Richmond (1907b) “Industrial insurance v. private insurance companies.” American Journal of Sociology 13: 349-79.Google Scholar
Henderson, Charles Richmond (1908) Industrial Insurance in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herrigel, Gary (1993) “Identity and institutions: The social construction of trade unions in nineteenth-century Germany and the United States.” Studies in American Political Development 7: 371-94.Google Scholar
Hindess, Barry (1982) “Power, interests, and the outcomes of struggles.” Sociology 16: 498–511.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Frederick L. (1909) “Industrial accidents and industrial diseases.” Publications of the American Statistical Association 88: 567–603.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Frederick L. (1910) “Fatal accidents in coal-mining.” Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of Labor 21: 437–674.Google Scholar
Holt, Erasmus Eugene (1906) “Physical economics.” Journal of the American Medical Association 47: 194–205.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (1989) “Public opinion and the new social history: Some lessons for the study of public opinion and democratic policy-making.” Social Science History 13: 1–24.Google Scholar
Jaher, Frederick Cople (1964) Doubters and Dissenters: Cataclysmic Thought in America, 1885-1918. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig, and Brents, Barbara G. (1989) “Social protest, hegemonic competition, and social reform: A political struggle interpretation of the origins of the American welfare state.” American Sociological Review 54: 891–909.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane (1989) “Paradigms and political discourse: Protective legislation in France and the United States before 1914.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 22: 235-58.Google Scholar
Katz, Michael B. (1986) In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Keiser, John (1965) John Fitzpatrick and Progressive Unionism: 1915-1925. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.Google Scholar
Kimeldorf, Howard (1991) “Bringing unions back in (or Why we need a new old labor history).” Labor History 32: 91–103.Google Scholar
Kingsley, S. C. (1910) “Compensation in case of sickness, accident, and death from the point of view of what a relief society would consider adequate.” Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections 37: 434-40.Google Scholar
Knights of Labor (1895) Proceedings of the General Assembly. Microfilm. Wisconsin State Historical Society Library, Madison.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Florence (1910) “Children’s institutions and the accident problem.” Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections 37: 425-33.Google Scholar
Long, Clarence D. (1958) The Labor Force under Changing Income and Employment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lowell, Charles Russell (1898) “Consumers’ leagues.” Publications of the Christian Social Union, no. 46: 1–27.Google Scholar
Lubove, Roy (1967) “Workmen’s compensation and the prerogatives of voluntarism.” Labor History 8: 255-79.Google Scholar
Mark, Clarence H. (1907) “The industrial scrap heap.” American Federationist 14: 89–91.Google Scholar
McClymer, John F. (1974) “The Pittsburgh Survey, 1907-1914: Forging an ideology in the steel district.” Pennsylvania History 41: 169-86.Google Scholar
McClymer, John F. (1980) War and Welfare: Social Engineering in America, 1890-1925. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
McCormick, Richard L. (1981) “The discovery that business corrupts politics: A reappraisal of the origins of progressivism.” American Historical Review 86: 247-74.Google Scholar
McCormick, Thomas (1967) China Market: America’s Quest for Informal Empire, 1893-1901. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
McKillen, Elizabeth (1987) Chicago Workers and the Struggle to Democratize Diplomacy: 1914-1924. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.Google Scholar
McLean, Francis H. (1908) “Industrial accidents and dependency in New York State.” Charities and the Commons 19: 1203-11.Google Scholar
Mercer, H. V. (1910) “Constitutional problems in workmen’s compensation,” in Publications of the American Association for Labor Legislation, no. 9. New York: American Association for Labor Legislation: 108-20.Google Scholar
Mitchell, John (1903) Organized Labor. Philadelphia: Dunlap.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy (1991) “The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics.” American Political Science Review 85: 77–96.Google Scholar
M’Mahon, D. I. (1903) “The relation between accidents and dependence.” Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections 30: 340-51.Google Scholar
National Civic Federation (1911) Proceedings Department on Compensation for Industrial Accidents and Their Prevention. New York: National Civic Federation.Google Scholar
National Consumers’ League (1909) “The consumer’s control of production: The work of the National Consumers’ League.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 34 (suppl.): 5–66.Google Scholar
Neill, Charles P. (1911) “Conditions of progress in employers’ liability legislation.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 38: 169-74.Google Scholar
Nelson, Barbara (1990) “The origins of the two-channel welfare state: Workmen’s compensation and mother’s aid,” in Gordon, Linda (ed.) Women, the State, and Welfare. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press: 123-51.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola (1991) “Gender in early U.S. social policy.” Journal of Policy History 3: 249-81.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola (1993) The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880-1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda (1984) “Why not equal protection? Explaining the politics of public spending in Britain, 1900-1911, and the United States, 1880s-1920.” American Sociological Review 49: 726-50.Google Scholar
Pavalko, Eliza (1989) “State timing of policy adoption: Workmen’s compensation in the United States, 1909-1929.” American Journal of Sociology 95: 592–615.Google Scholar
Procacci, Giovanna (1991) “Social economy and the government of poverty,” in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 151-68.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill S. (1984) “Welfare capitalism and the Social Security Act of 1935.” American Sociological Review 49: 575-78.Google Scholar
Reagan, Patrick (1981) “The ideology of social harmony and efficiency: Workmen’s compensation in Ohio, 1904-1919.” Ohio History 90: 317-31.Google Scholar
Reeve, Arthur (1907) “Our industrial juggernaut.” Everybody’s Magazine 16: 147-57.Google Scholar
Reinarman, Craig (1988) “The social construction of an alcohol problem.” Theory and Society 17: 91–120.Google Scholar
Report of the Legislature of New York by the Commission Appointed under Ch. 518 of the Laws of 1909 to Inquire into the Question of Employer’s Liability and Other Matters (1910) Albany, NY: J. B. Lyon.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. (1982) “In search of progressivism.” Reviews in American History 10: 113-32.Google Scholar
Ross, David (1909) “Employer’s liability laws.” American Federationist 16: 953-58.Google Scholar
Rubinow, I. M. (1913) Social Insurance. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Schottler, Peter (1989) “Historians and discourse analysis.” History Workshop 27: 37–68.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael (1989) “How culture works: Perspectives from media studies on the efficacy of symbols.” Theory and Society 18: 153-80.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. (1991) “The evidence of experience.” Critical Inquiry 17: 773-97.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr., (1992) “A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 1–29.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr., (1993) “Toward a post-materialist rhetoric for labor history,” in Berlanstein, Lenard R. (ed.) Rethinking Labor History: Essays on Discourse and Class Analysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press: 15–38.Google Scholar
Shalev, Michael (1983) “The social democratic model and beyond: Two generations of comparative research on the welfare state.” Comparative Social Research 6: 315-62.Google Scholar
Siegel, Boaz (1940) “History of the enactment of the Workmen’s Compensation Law in the state of Michigan.” M. A. thesis, Department of History, Wayne State University, Detroit.Google Scholar
Simpson, William Hays (1949) Workmen’s Compensation in South Carolina. Charlotte, SC: Dowd.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Abend-Wein, Marjorie, Howard, Christopher, and Lehmann, Susan Goodrich (1993) “Women’s associations and the enactment of mother’s pensions in the United States.” American Political Science Review 87: 686–701.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Amenta, Edwin (1986) “States and social policies.” Annual Review of Sociology 12:131-57.Google Scholar
Smith, Hal H. (1908) “The question of employers’ liability.” Michigan Manufacturer and Financial Record 1, no. 2: 1–2.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., and Benford, Robert D. (1988) “Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1: 197–218.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Rochford, E. Burke Jr., Worden, Steven K., and Benford, Robert D. (1986) “Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation.” American Sociological Review 51: 464-81.Google Scholar
Social Reform Club of New York (1897-1900) Annual reports. New York Public Library, New York.Google Scholar
Solin, Jacob A. (1939) “The Detroit Federation of Labor, 1900-1920.” M.A. thesis, Department of History, Wayne State University, Detroit.Google Scholar
Staley, Eugene (1930) History of the Illinois Federation of Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
State of Illinois (1910) Report of the Employer’s Liability Commission of the State of Illinois. Chicago: Stromberg, Allen.Google Scholar
State of Michigan (1907-8) Proceedings and Debates of the Constitutional Convention. Lansing, MI: Wynkoop Hallenback Crawford.Google Scholar
State of Michigan (1911) Report of the Employer’s Liability and Workmen’s Compensation Commission of Michigan. Lansing, MI: Wynkoop Hallenback Crawford.Google Scholar
State of Ohio (1911) Minutes of Evidence and Record of Public Hearings Accompanying the Report to the Legislature of the State of Ohio by the Ohio Employer’s Liability Commission. Columbus: F. I. Heer.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Marc W. (1991) “Talkin’ class: Discourse, ideology, and their roles in class conflict,” in McNall, Scott G., Levine, Rhonda F., and Fantasia, Rick (eds.) Bringing Class Back In: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview: 261-84.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Marc W. (1994) “The dialogue of struggle: The contest over ideological boundaries in the case of London silk weavers ih the early nineteenth century.” Social Science History 18: 505-41.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (1993) Regulating the Social: The Welfare State and Local Politics in Imperial Germany. Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, John D. (1979) The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor, Graham (1908) “The industrial viewpoint.” Charities and the Commons 19: 1562–1656.Google Scholar
Tentler, Leslie Woodcock (1979) Wage-Earning Women: Industrial Work and Family Life in the United States, 1900-1930. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran (1980) The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. London: Villiers.Google Scholar
Tripp, Joseph F. (1976) “An instance of labor and business cooperation: Workmen’s compensation in Washington State.” Labor History 17: 531-50.Google Scholar
Urofsky, Melvin I. (1985) “State courts and protective legislation during the Progressive Era: A reevaluation.” Journal of American History 72: 63–91.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (1926) “Workmen’s compensation legislation of the United States and Canada as of July 1,1926.” Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, no. 423: 1–674.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1911) Hearings before the Commission on Employer’s Liability and Workmen’s Compensation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vernon, James (1994) “Who’s afraid of the ‘linguistic turn’? The politics of social history and its discontents.” Social History 19: 81–97.Google Scholar
Volosinov, V. N. (1986 [1929]) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. Matejka, Ladislav and Titunik, I. R.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, James (1967) “Big business and the origins of workmen’s compensation.” Labor History 8:156-74.Google Scholar
Wesser, Robert F. (1971) “Conflict and compromise: The workmen’s compensation movement in New York, 1890-1913.” Labor History 12: 345-72.Google Scholar
Workmen’s Compensation Report upon Operation of State Laws, Investigation by Commission of the American Federation of Labor and the National Civic Federation (1914) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Yellowitz, Irwin (1965) Labor and the Progressive Movement in New York State, 1897–1916. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar