Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:18:33.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Contrasting Effects of Education on Fertility over Time Casalguidi, 1819–1960

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2021

Matteo Manfredini Open the ORCID record for Matteo Manfredini [Opens in a new window] ,
Marco Breschi  and
Alessio Fornasin
Matteo Manfredini*
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Parma, 43124, Italy
Marco Breschi
Affiliation:
University of Sassari, Sassari, 07100, Italy
Alessio Fornasin
Affiliation:
University of Udine, Udine, 33100, Italy
*
*Email: matteo.manfredini@unipr.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Education has been frequently claimed to shape demographic outcomes. Mortality, fertility, and nuptiality have all been attested to be affected to some extent by education attainment. This article investigates the effects of education on fertility over time in a rural Italian community once controlled for potential confounders. Using individual-level data drawn from various sources, the study analyzes the role of education in shaping reproductive behaviors not only during the demographic transition (1890–1960) but also in the pretransitional period (1819–59). The results highlight the contrasting effects of literacy on fertility, which passed from a positive association in the ancien régime to a negative one in the transitional phase. Educated couples were therefore forerunners in the process of fertility decline because they were not only in the position to be the most pressed to control reproduction but also because they were likely aware of reproductive mechanisms, had the knowledge of more effective birth-control methods, had the economic possibility to get them, and had the necessary capacity to use them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , Fall 2021 , pp. 519 - 533
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Paul D. (2000) “Multiple imputation for missing data: A cautionary tale.” Sociological Methods & Research 28 (3): 301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, George, Neven, Muriel, and Oris, Michel (2010) “Economic change and differential fertility in rural Eastern Belgium, 1812 to 1875,” in Tsuya, Noriko O., Feng, Wang, Alter, George, and Lee, James Z. (eds.) Prudence and Pressure: Reproduction and Human Agency in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900. MIT Press: 195–216.Google Scholar
Appleton, Simon (1996) “How does female education affect fertility? A structural model for the Cote d’Ivoire.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 58 (1): 139–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ariés, Philippe (1973) Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. Penguin.Google Scholar
Axinn, William G., and Barber, Jennifer S. (2001) “Mass education and fertility transition.” American Sociological Review (66): 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbagli, Marzio (1990) “Sistemi di formazione della famiglia in Italia,” in Società Italiana di Demografia Storica (ed.) Popolazione, Società, Ambiente. Temi di Demografia Storica Italiana (secc. XVII–XIX). CLUEB: 3–44.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1960) “An economic analysis of fertility,” in National Bureau of Economic Research (ed.) Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Princeton University Press: 209–31.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1991) A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1992) “Fertility and the economy.” Journal of Population Economics (5): 185–201.Google ScholarPubMed
Becker, Gary S., and Lewis, Gregg H. (1973) “On the Interaction between the quantity and quality of children.” Journal of Political Economy (81): 279–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Sascha O., Cinnirella, Francesco, and Woessmann, Ludger (2010) “The trade-off between fertility and education: Evidence from before the demographic transition.” Journal of Economic Growth (15): 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Giulia (1986) “La diffusione della mezzadria nell’Italia Centrale: un modello di sviluppo demografico ed economico.” Bollettino di Demografia Storica (3): 59–66.Google Scholar
Breschi, Marco (1990) La popolazione toscana dal 1640 al 1940. Un’ipotesi di ricostruzione. Dipartimento Statistico, Università degli Studi di Firenze.Google Scholar
Breschi, Marco, Esposito, Massimo, Fornasin, Alessio, and Manfredini, Matteo (2016) “Reproductive change in transitional Italy: More insights from the Italian fertility survey of 1961.” Annales de Demographie Historique (2): 111–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breschi, Marco, Fornasin, Alessio, and Manfredini, Matteo (2013) “Patterns of reproductive behavior in transitional Italy: The rediscovery of the Italian fertility survey of 1961.” Demographic Research (29): 1227–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, John C. (1976) “Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory.” Population and Development Review (2): 321–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, John C. (1982) The Theory of Fertility Decline. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, John C., and Caldwell, Pat (1987) “The cultural context of high fertility in sub-Saharan Africa.” Population and Development Review (13): 409–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caltabiano, Marcantonio, and Zuanna, Gianpiero Dalla (2015) Fecondità, Istruzione e Classe Sociale. Donne Nate nel Secolo 1861–1961 in Italia e nelle sue Regioni. Cleup.Google Scholar
Cleland, John (2002) “Education and future fertility trends, with special reference to mid-transitional countries,” in United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (ed.) Completing the Fertility Transition. United Nations: 187–202.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J. (1973) “The demographic transition reconsidered,” in International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (ed.) International Population Conference. IUSSP: 53–72.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansely J., and Trussell, T. James (1978) “Technical note: Finding the two parameters that specify a model schedule of marital fertility.” Population Index 44 (2): 203–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, Susan H. (1979) Fertility and Education: What Do We Really Know? Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derosas, Renzo, and Van Poppel, Frans (2006) Religion and the Decline of Fertility in the Western World. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doveri, Andrea (2000) “Land, fertility, and family: A selected review of the literature in historical demography.” Genus LVI (3/4): 19–59.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A., and Crimmins, Eileen M. (1985) The Fertility Revolution: A Supply-Demand Analysis. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fleury, Michel, and Henry, Louis (1965) Nouveau Manuel de Dépouillement et d’Exploitation de l’État Civil Ancient. Éditions de l’Institute National d’Etudes Démographiques.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded (2005) “The demographic transition and the emergence of sustained economic growth.” Journal of the European Economic Association (3): 494–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, Oded, and Moav, Omer (2002) “Natural selection and the origin of economic growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics (117): 1133–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jejeebhoy, Shireen J. (1995) Women’s Education, Autonomy and Reproductive Behaviour: Experiences from Developing Countries. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Knodel, John, and Wilson, Chris (1981) “The secular increase in fecundity in German village populations: An analysis of reproductive histories of couples married 1750–1899.” Population Studies 35 (1): 53–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Léridon, Henri (1984) “Selective effects of sterility and fertility,” in Bongaarts, John and Keyfitz, Nathan (eds.) Population and Biology, Bridge between Disciplines: Proceedings of a Conference. Ordina Editions: 83–97.Google Scholar
Léridon, Henri (2015) “The development of fertility theories: A multidisciplinary endeavour.” Population (70): 309–48.Google Scholar
Manfredini, Matteo (1996) “L’utilizzo degli Status Animarum nelle ricostruzioni nominative: miglioramenti informativi qualitativi e quantitativi. Il caso di Madregolo (1629–1914).” Bollettino di Demografia Storica (24/25): 113–29.Google Scholar
Manfredini, Matteo, and Breschi, Marco (2008) “Socioeconomic structure and differential fertility by wealth in a mid-nineteenth century Tuscan community.” Annales de Demographie Historique (1): 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrary, Justin, and Royer, Heather (2011) “The effect of female education on fertility and infant health: Evidence from school entry policies using exact date of birth.” American Economic Review 101 (1): 158–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Notestein, Frank W. (1953) “Economic problems of population change,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economists. Oxford University Press: 13–31.Google Scholar
Oris, Michel, Derosas, Renzo, and Breschi, Marco (2004) “Infant and child mortality,” in Bengtsson, Tommy, Campbell, Cameron, and Lee, James Z. (eds.) Life under Pressure: Mortality and Living Standards in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900. Massachusetts University Press: 359–98.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Mark, and Schultz, T. Paul (1989) “Schooling, information and nonmarket productivity: Contraceptive use and its effectiveness.” International Economic Review (30): 457–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanfors, Maria, and Larsson, Cecilia (2014) “Women’s education, empowerment, and contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa: Findings from recent demographic and health surveys.” Etude de la Population Africaine (28): 1022–34.Google Scholar
Vallin, Jacques (2006) “Europe’s demographic transition 1740–1940,” in Caselli, Grazia, Vallin, Jacques, and Wunsch, Guillaume (eds.) Demography, Analysis and Synthesis: A Treatise in Population. Springer: 41–66.Google Scholar
Vitali, Ornello (1970) “Popolazione attiva in agricoltura attraverso i censimenti in Italia: nuove valutazioni.” Quaderni Storici 5 (14): 541–76.Google Scholar