Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:46:23.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micro and Macro Land Availability as a Determinant of Human Fertility in Rural Canada West, 1851

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

William L. Marr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To date, there has been no attempt in Ontario economic history to examine human fertility in the nineteenth century by area of the province where area is differentiated by the extent of agricultural development and the data used are at the household level. In the United States, Richard Easterlin and his colleagues (1978) used a sample of rural households from the 1860 manuscript census to look at fertility, family, and agricultural differences and similarities for old and new areas in the northern states. The present study takes the census districts of Canada West (now Ontario) in 1851, divides them into three groups by the percentage of ever-improved agricultural land, and uses a sample of farm households from the manuscript census of 1851–52 as the data set. Since the extent of agricultural development can be taken as a proxy for county wide land availability, the contribution of this study is to relate land availability at both the county and household levels to fertility in the mid-nineteenth century.

Type
Family and Demography
Information
Social Science History , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , Winter 1992 , pp. 583 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Easterlin, R. A., Alter, G., and Condran, G. (1978) “Farms and farm families in old and new areas: the northern states in 1860,” in Hareven, T. K. and Vinovskis, M. A. (eds.) Family and Population in Nineteenth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 22–85.Google Scholar
Forster, C., and Tucker, G. S. L. (1972) Economic Opportunity and White American Fertility Ratios, 1800–1860. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leet, D. R. (1977) “Interrelations of population density, urbanization, literacy and fertility.” Explorations in Economic History 14:388–401.Google Scholar
McInnis, M. (1977) “Childbearing and land availability: Some evidence from individual household data,” in Lee, R. (ed.) Population Patterns in the Past. New York.Google Scholar
Marr, W. L. (1986a) “Fertility rates among married couples in rural Canada West, 1851: Some first estimates.” Discussion paper, Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University.Google Scholar
Marr, W. L. (1986b) “Nuptiality, total fertility, and marital fertility in Upper Canada, 1851.” Canadian Studies in Population 13:1–18.Google Scholar
Schapiro, M. O. (1982) “Land availability and fertility in the United States, 1760–1870.” Journal of Economic History 42:577–600.Google Scholar
Tepperman, L. (1974) “Ethnic variations in marriage and fertility: Canada, 1871.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 11:324–43.Google Scholar
Vinovskis, M. A. (1976) “Socioeconomic determinants of interstate fertility differentials in the United States in 1859 and 1860.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 6:375–96.Google Scholar
Vinovskis, M. A. (1984) “Historical perspectives on rural development in nineteenth century America,” in Schutzer, W. A. and Stokes, C. S. (eds.) Rural Development and Human Fertility. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yasuba, Y. (1962) Birth Rates of the White Population in the United States, 1800–1860. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar