Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:21:06.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suffrage Expansion and Legislative Behavior in Nineteenth-Century Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Gary W. Cox  and
James W. Ingram III
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The importance of suffrage expansion to the formation of “modern” political parties—and with them mass representative democracy as we know it today—is widely recognized. Nonetheless, most of what we know about the link between suffrage expansion and democratic politics concerns only the electoral arena. The major comparative studies of party development (Weber 1946; Duverger 1955; LaPalombara and Weiner 1966), for example, have stressed how larger electorates led to more elaborate and centralized extra-parliamentary organization, to “populist” campaigning styles, and to the promotion of socialist parties. This study concerns the legislative effects of extending the suffrage. Although we focus on nineteenth-century Britain, parts of our argument pertain to other cases.

Type
Politics
Information
Social Science History , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , Winter 1992 , pp. 539 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1992 

References

Chester, D. N., and Bowring, N. (1962) Questions in Parliament. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1970) “The Origins of the standing committees and the development of the modern House.” Rice University Studies 56:1–167.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W. (1987) The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cromwell, V. (1967) “The losing of the initiative by the House of Commons, 1780–1914. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 18:1–17.Google Scholar
Duverger, M. (1955) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, translated by North, B. and North, R.. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. (1976) Urban Politics in Victorian England. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. (1960) “The growth of ministerial control in the nineteenth century House of Commons.” English Historical Review 74:444–63.Google Scholar
Gash, N. (1977) Politics in the Age of Peel. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Glynn, J. K. (1949) “The private Member of Parliament, 1833–1868.” Ph.D. diss., University of London.Google Scholar
Gurowich, P. M. (1984) “The continuation of war by other means: Party and politics, 1855–1865.” Historical Journal 27:603–31.Google Scholar
Hanham, H. J. (1978) Elections and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Disraeli and Gladstone. 2d ed. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Ilbert, C. (1901) Legislative Methods and Forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. (1990) “The development of questioning in the British House of Commons.” University of California at San Diego. Typescript.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, J., and Weiner, M. (eds.) (1966) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramm, A. (1984) “The parliamentary context of cabinet government, 1868–1874.” English Historical Review 99:739–69.Google Scholar
Redlich, J. (1908) The Procedure of the House of Commons. 3 vols. London: Archibald Constable.Google Scholar
Richards, P. G. (1979) “Private Members’ legislation,” in Walkland, S. A. (ed.) The House of Commons in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Todd, A. (1869) On Parliamentary Government in England: Its Origin, Development, and Practical Operations. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1946) Essays in Sociology, translated and edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar