Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:01:35.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking Seriously Ingroup Self-Evaluation, Meta-Prejudice, and Prejudice in Analyzing Interreligious Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Idhamsyah Eka Putra
Idhamsyah Eka Putra*
Affiliation:
Persada Indonesia University (Indonesia)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Idhamsyah Eka Putra. Persada Indonesia University. YAI. Jl. Diponegoro No. 74. 10340. Jakarta Pusat (Indonesia). E-mail: Idhamsyah_Ekaputra@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study aims to understand the conditions where prejudice can be predicted by ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice. The data collecting was disseminated toward Muslim and Christian participants (N = 362) living in Maumere, Flores Island, Indonesia. In Flores, Christianity is the largest religion and Islam is the second. Across two samples, the effects of ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice on prejudice were found to be moderated by ingroup self-evaluation. It shows that at high level (but not low) of positive ingroup self-evaluation, ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice were found to predict prejudice. The results suggest that it is important to consider how group members evaluate their own group and how group members think what others are thinking, in the study pertaining to intergroup relations.

Keywords

intergroup relationsgroup evaluationsmeta-knowledgeprejudice
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 19 , 2016 , E46
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G. W. (1958). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bertrand, J. (2004). Nationalism and ethnic conflict in Indonesia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brambilla, M., Manzi, C., Regalia, C., & Verkuyten, M. (2013). Religiosity and prejudice: Different patterns for two types of religious internalization. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 486–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2013.768592 Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Pierce, K. P. (2005). Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 428–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271710 Google Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency. (2013). The world-factbook: Religions. Retrieved from Central Intelligence Agency Website https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2122.html#xx Google Scholar
Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414 Google Scholar
Elcheroth, G., Doise, W., & Reicher, S. (2011). On the knowledge of the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32, 729–758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00834.x Google Scholar
Goldstein, N. J., Vezich, I. S., & Shapiro, J. R. (2014). Perceived perspective taking: When others walk in our shoes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 941–960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036395 Google Scholar
Hanafi, M. M. (2011). Menggugat Ahmadiyah: Mengungkapkan ayat-ayat kontroversial dala tafsir Ahmadiyah [Suing Ahmadiyya: Revealing the texts in Ahmadiyya’s interpretations]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Lentera Hati.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. (2013). Indonesia: Religious minorities’ targets of rising violence. Retrieved from Human Rights Watch Website http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/02/28/indonesia-religious-minorities-targets-rising-violence Google Scholar
Jackson, B. R., & Bergeman, C. S. (2011). How does religiosity enhance well-being? The role of perceived control. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3, 149–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021597 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaspars, J. F., & Warnaen, S. (1982). Intergroup relations, ethnic identity, and self-evaluation in Indonesia. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 335–366). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lingkaran Survey Indonesia. (2012). Meningkatnya populasi yang tidak nyaman dengan keberagaman [The increasing numbers of populations that uncomfortable with diversity]. Retrieved from Lingkaran Survey Indonesia. Website http://lsi.co.id/lsi/2012/10/22/meningkatnya-populasi-yang-tidak-nyaman-dengan-keberagaman-2/ Google Scholar
Long, E. C., & Andrews, D. W. (1990). Perspective taking as a predictor of marital adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 126–131.Google Scholar
Lawler-Row, K. A. (2010). Forgiveness as a mediator of the religiosity-health relationship. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017584 Google Scholar
Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., O’Brien, L. T., & McCoy, S. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068–1086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068 Google Scholar
Ministry of Religious Affairs, General Attorney, & Ministry of Internal Affairs. (2008). Peringatan dan perintah kepada penganut, angota, dan/atau anggota pengurus Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI). [Warnings and orders to followers, members and / or members of the board of Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI)]. Retrieved from http://sumut.kemenag.go.id/file/file/SKB/qecr1362680584.pdf Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2012). The global religious landscape. Retrieved from Pew Research Center Website http://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-exec/ Google Scholar
Phelps, J. M., Ommundsen, R., Türken, S., & Ulleberg, P. (2013). Intergroup perception and proactive majority integration attitudes. Social Psychology, 44, 196–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000104 Google Scholar
Putra, I. E. (2014). The role of ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice in predicting prejudice and identity undermining. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 574–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pac0000068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putra, I. E., & Sukabdi, Z. A. (2013). Basic concepts and reasons behind the emergence of religious terror activities in Indonesia: An inside view. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 83–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12001 Google Scholar
Quintana, S. M., Ybarra, V. C., Gonzalez-Doupe, P., & De Baesa, Y. (2000). Cross-cultural evaluation of ethnic perspective-taking ability: An exploratory investigation with U.S Latino and Guatemalan Ladino children. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 6, 334–351. http://dx.doi.org//10.1037//1099-9809.6.4.334 Google Scholar
Reicher, S. (2012). From perception to mobilization: The shifting paradigm of prejudice. In Dixon, J. & Levine, M. (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 27–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salinas, M. F. (2007). Planting hatred, sowing plain: The psychology of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. London, UK: Praeger.Google Scholar
Sen, R., Wagner, W., & Howarth, C. (2014). Secularism and religion in multifaith societies: The case of India. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Syihab, H. R. (2013). Wawasan kebangsaan menuju NKRI bersyariah [Towards national visions of NKRI with Islamic law]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Islam Press.Google Scholar
van Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J. N., & Davis, D. E. (2013). Defensive religion as a source of meaning in life: A dual mediational model. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 227–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M. (2007). Religious group identification and inter-religious relations: A study among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Group Process & Intergroup Relations, 10, 341–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430207078695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M., & Zaremba, K. (2005). Interethnic relations in a changing political context. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 375–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800405 Google Scholar
Vorauer, J. D., Hunter, A. J., Main, K. J., & Roy, S. A. (2000). Meta-streotype activation: Evidence from indirect measures for specific evaluative concerns experienced by members of dominant groups in intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 690–707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., & O’Connel, G. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917–937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917 Google Scholar
Warnaen, S. (2002). Stereotip etnis dalam masyarakat multietnis [Ethnic stereotypes in multi-ethnic society]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Matabangsa.Google Scholar
Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an undestanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 60–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349693 Google Scholar