Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:50:39.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes Towards Same-Sex Marriage in Portugal: Predictors and Scale Validation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2014

João Manuel de Oliveira ,
Diniz Lopes ,
Miguel Cameira  and
Conceição Nogueira
João Manuel de Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Portugal)
Diniz Lopes
Affiliation:
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Portugal)
Miguel Cameira
Affiliation:
Universidade do Porto (Portugal)
Conceição Nogueira
Affiliation:
Universidade do Porto (Portugal)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to João Manuel de Oliveira. CIS-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa. Av. Das Forças Armadas. 1649–026. Lisboa (Portugal). E-mail: joao.m.oliveira@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goal of the present research was to validate a Portuguese version of Pearl and Galupo’s (2007) Attitudes toward Same-Sex Marriage Scale (ATSM). Participants were 1,402 heterosexual men and women that completed an on-line questionnaire. The final 15-item scale formed a single factor showing high internal consistency (α = .95). This one factor structure was backed-up by a confirmatory factorial analysis. In a general way, the results indicate a clearly positive attitude toward same-sex marriage (overall mean was 63.79, SD = 12.66, above the scale mid-point, t(1401) = 55.55, p < .001). Furthermore, analysis of the scale’s predictors demonstrates how a left-wing orientation (β = .22, p < .001) and the level of denial of deservingness for lesbian/gay discrimination (β = .30, p < .001) prove to be the best predictors of attitudes towards same-sex marriage. On the whole, these results indicate that the Portuguese ATSM version is a reliable instrument for carrying out scientific research and measuring and monitoring public opinion on this subject.

Keywords

same-sex marriagescale validationattitudespredictors
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E93
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Becker, A. B. (2012). What's marriage (and family) got to do with it? Support for same-sex marriage, legal unions, and gay and lesbian couples raising children. Social Science Quarterly, 93, 1007–1029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00844.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 Google Scholar
Bessen, Y., & Zicklin, G. (2007). Young men, religion and attitudes towards homosexuality. Journal of Men, Masculinities and Spirituality, 1, 250–256.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4 Google Scholar
Brumbaugh, S. M., Sanchez, L. A., Nock, S. L., & Wright, J. D. (2008). Attitudes toward gay marriage in states undergoing marriage law transformation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 345–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00486.x Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2011). Discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity in Europe. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Duncan, M. L., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2012). Attitudes toward same-sex marriage: An essentialist approach. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12, 377–399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2012.01290.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2006). Public opinion in the European Union: Standard Eurobarometer, 66. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
Fleischmann, A., & Moyer, L. (2009). Competing social movements and local political culture: Voting on ballot propositions to ban same-sex marriage in the U.S. states. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 134–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00607.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gato, J., Fontaine, A. M., & Carneiro, N. S. (2012). Escala multidimensional de atitudes face a lésbicas e gays: Construção e validação preliminar [Multidimensional Scale of Attitudes towards Lesbians and Gay Men: Construction and preliminary validation]. Paidéia, 22, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167296224007 Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL 6: User’s guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Lannutti, P. J., & Lachlan, K. A. (2007). Assessing attitude toward same-sex marriage: Scale development and validation. Journal of Homosexuality, 53, 113–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00918360802103373 Google Scholar
Lewis, G. B., & Gossett, C. W. (2008). Changing public opinion on same-sex marriage: The case of California. Politics & Policy, 36, 4–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x Google Scholar
Lubbers, M., Jaspers, E., & Ultee, W. (2009). Primary and secondary socialization impacts on support for same-sex marriage after legalization in the Netherlands. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1714–1745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09334267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, S. A., & Stewart, A. (2012). Privileged allies in lesbian and gay rights activism: Gender, generation, and resistance to heteronormativity. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 162–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01742.x Google Scholar
Moskowitz, D., Rieger, G., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Heterosexual attitudes toward same-sex marriage. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 325–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00918360903489176 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6 th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3 rd Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Oliveira, J. M., Costa, C. G., & Nogueira, C. (2013). The workings of homonormativity: Discourses of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Queer people on discrimination and public display of affections in Portugal. Journal of Homosexuality, 60, 1475–1493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2013.819221 Google Scholar
Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., & Harrison, J. T. (2006). Religion and public opinion about same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 340–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00384.x Google Scholar
Pearl, M. L., & Galupo, M. P. (2007). Development and validation of the attitudes toward same-sex marriage scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 53, 117–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v53n03_07 Google Scholar
Roseneil, S., Crowhurst, I., Hellesund, T., Santos, A. C., & Stoilova, M. (2013). Changing landscapes of heteronormativity: The regulation and normalization of same-sex sexualities in Europe. Social Politics, 20, 165–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxt006 Google Scholar
Russell, G. M. (2011). Motives of heterosexual allies in collective action for equality. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 376–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01703.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, J. (2010). Investigating differences in public support for gay rights issues. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 748–759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2010.485875 Google Scholar
Sherkat, D. E., Powell-Williams, M., Maddox, G., & de Vries, , , K. M. (2011). Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 1988–2008. Social Science Research, 40, 167–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.009 Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walls, N. E. (2010). Religion and support for same-sex marriage: Implications from the literature. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 22, 112–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10538720903332420 Google Scholar