Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:34:30.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contrasting ABA, AAB and ABC Renewal in a Free Operant Procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2014

Rodolfo Bernal-Gamboa ,
Montserrat Carrasco-López  and
Javier Nieto
Rodolfo Bernal-Gamboa*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México)
Montserrat Carrasco-López
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México)
Javier Nieto*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Javier Nieto or Rodolfo Bernal-Gamboa. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Coyoacán. 04510. Ciudad de México (México). E-mail: janigu@unam.mx; rodolfo.bernalg@gmail.com
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Javier Nieto or Rodolfo Bernal-Gamboa. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Coyoacán. 04510. Ciudad de México (México). E-mail: janigu@unam.mx; rodolfo.bernalg@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One experiment used a free operant procedure with rats to compare ABA, AAB and ABC renewal by using a within-subject testing procedure. All rats were first trained to press a lever for food in context A. Lever pressing was then extinguished in either context A or context B. For rats in the groups ABA and ABC extinction took place in context B, while the rats in group AAB received extinction in the same context in which acquisition took place (context A). Finally, all rats were tested for renewal in two sessions. One extinction session was carried out in the same extinction context and another session in a different context. Rats in the group ABA were tested in context B and in context A; rats in the group AAB were tested in contexts A and B, whereas the group ABC was tested in contexts B and C. The results of the ANOVA showed context renewal since all groups had higher rates of responding when they were tested outside the extinction context, F(2, 21) = 15.32, p = .001, ηp 2 = .59; however, AAB and ABC renewal was lesser than ABA renewal, F(1, 21) = 16.70, p = .0001, ηp 2 = .61.

Keywords

contextextinctionoperant conditioningratsrenewal
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E67
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernal-Gamboa, R., Juárez, Y., González-Martín, G., Carranza, R., Sánchez-Carrasco, L., & Nieto, J. (2012). ABA, AAB and ABC renewal in taste aversion learning. Psicológica, 33, 1–13.Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E. (1991). Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In Dachowski, L. & Flaherty, C. F. (Eds.), Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion and cognition (pp. 25–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouton, M. E. (1994). Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting. Journal of experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 219–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.20.3.219 Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E. (2004). Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory, 11, 485–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.78804 Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Bolles, R. C. (1979). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear. Learning and Motivation. 10, 445–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(79)90057-2 Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Nelson, J. B. (1998). The role of context in classical conditioning: Some implications for cognitive behavior therapy. In O'Donohue, W. (Ed.), Learning and behavior therapy (pp. 59–84). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Peck, C. A. (1989). Context effects on conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement in an appetitive conditioning preparation. Animal Learning and Behavior, 17, 188–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207634 Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Ricker, S. T. (1994). Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context. Animal Learning and Behavior, 22, 317–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03209840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of context participating in a pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 333–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.12.4.333 Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E., Todd, T. P., Vurbic, D., & Winterbauer, N. E. (2011). Renewal after the extinction of free operant behavior. Learning and Behavior, 39, 57–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-011-0018-6 Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E., Winterbauer, N. E., & Todd, P. T. (2012). Relapse processes after the extinction of instrumental learning: Renewal, resurgence, and reacquisition. Behavioural Processes, 90, 130–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.004 Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E., & Woods, A. M. (2008). Extinction: Behavioral mechanisms and their implications. In Byrne, J. H., Sweatt, D., Menzel, R., Eichenbaum, H., & Roediger, (Eds.), Learning and Memory: A comprehensive reference. Learning Theory and Behaviour. (Vol. 1, pp. 151–171). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Conklin, C. (2006). Environments as cues to smoke: Implications for human extinction based research and treatment. Experimental and clinical Psychopharmacology, 14, 12–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.14.1.12 Google Scholar
Denniston, J. C., Chang, R. C., & Miller, R. R. (2003). Massive extinction treatment attenuates the renewal effect. Learning and Motivation, 34, 68–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0023-9690(02)00508-8 Google Scholar
Harris, J. A., Jones, L., Bailey, G. K., & Westbrook, R. F. (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in an extinction paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 174–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.26.2.174 Google Scholar
Havermans, R. C., Keuker, J., Lataster, T., & Jansen, A. (2005). Contextual control of extinguished conditioned performance in humans. Learning and Motivation, 36, 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2004.09.002 Google Scholar
Laborda, M. A., McConnell, B. L., & Miller, R. R. (2011). Behavioral techniques to reduce relapse after exposure therapy: Applicatiojns of studies of experimental extinction. In Schachtman, T. & Reily, S. (Eds.), Applications of conditioning theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nakajima, S., Tanaka, S., Urshihara, K., & Imada, H. (2000). Renewal of extinguished lever-press responses upon return to the training context. Learning and Motivation, 31, 416–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.2000.1064 Google Scholar
Nelson, J. B., Lamoureux, J. A., & León, S. P. (2013). Extinction arouses attention to the context in a behavioral suppression method with humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 39, 99–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030759 Google Scholar
Pineño, O., & Miller, R. R. (2004). Signalling a change in cue–outcome relations in human associative learning. Learning & Behavior, 32, 360–375.Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (2008). Within-subject renewal in sign tracking. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1793–1802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210701790099 Google Scholar
Romero, M. A., Vila, N. J., & Rosas, J. M. (2003). Time and context effects after discrimination reversal in human beings. Psicológica, 24, 169–184 Google Scholar
Rosas, J. M., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 461–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.461 Google Scholar
Rosas, J. M., García-Gutiérrez, A., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). AAB and ABA renewal as a function of the number of extinction trials in conditioned taste aversion. Psicológica, 28, 129–150.Google Scholar
Rosas, J. M., Vila, N. J., Lugo, M., & López, L. (2001). Combined effect of context change and retention interval upon interference in causality judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 153–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.27.2.153 Google Scholar
Rosas, J. M., Todd, T. P., & Bouton, M. E. (2013). Context change and associative learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4, 237–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1225 Google Scholar
Thomas, B. L., Larsen, N., & Ayres, J. B. (2003). Role of context similarity in ABA, ABC and AAB renewal paradigms: Implications for theories of renewal and for treating human phobias. Learning and Motivation, 34, 410–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0023-9690(03)00037-7 Google Scholar
Todd, T. P. (2013). Mechanisms of renewal after the extinction of instrumental behavior. Journal of Experimental Pscyhology: Animal Behavior Processes, 39, 193–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032236 Google Scholar
Todd, T. P., Winterbauer, N. E., & Bouton, M. E. (2012). Effects of the amount of acquisition and contextual generalization on the renewal of instrumental behavior after extinction. Learning and Behavior, 40, 145–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-011-0051-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Üngör, M., & Lachnit, H. (2008). Dissociations among ABA, ABC and AAB recovery effects. Learning and Motivation, 39, 181–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2007.08.001 Google Scholar