Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:09:41.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and Psychometric Analysis of the Stressors and Modulators of Gestational Stress Inventory (SMGSI)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2020

Raquel González-Ochoa ,
Nazira Calleja Open the ORCID record for Nazira Calleja [Opens in a new window] ,
María Rocío Hernández-Pozo Open the ORCID record for María Rocío Hernández-Pozo [Opens in a new window] ,
Yolanda Campos-Uscanga Open the ORCID record for Yolanda Campos-Uscanga [Opens in a new window] ,
Antonia Barranca-Enríquez Open the ORCID record for Antonia Barranca-Enríquez [Opens in a new window]  and
Tania Romo-González Open the ORCID record for Tania Romo-González [Opens in a new window]
Raquel González-Ochoa
Affiliation:
Universidad Veracruzana (Mexico)
Nazira Calleja
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México (Mexico)
María Rocío Hernández-Pozo
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México (Mexico)
Yolanda Campos-Uscanga
Affiliation:
Universidad Veracruzana (Mexico)
Antonia Barranca-Enríquez
Affiliation:
Universidad Veracruzana (Mexico)
Tania Romo-González*
Affiliation:
Universidad Veracruzana (Mexico)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tania Romo-González. Universidad Veracruzana. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas. Área de Biología y Salud Integral. Dr. Luis Castellano, s/n, Col. Industrial Las Animas, Xalapa. 91190 Veracruz (Mexico). E-mail: tromogonzalez@uv.mx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gestational stress is associated with many maternal and child complications, however, this association must be taken with care, since there are studies that find inconsistent results between stress measures and maternal complications. It is believed that the lack of convergence is due to the way in which gestational stress is evaluated.

The aim of the present study was to design and validate an instrument based on a bio-psycho-social model of gestational stress. The design and validation process of the inventory was divided into four phases: (a) Construction of the items bank and content validity, (b) construct validity, (c) inventory reliability and (d) convergent and discriminant validity with psychometric instruments that have been used in other investigations to evaluate gestational stress.

A valid and reliable Stressors and Modulators of Gestational Stress Inventory (SMGSI) conformed by two scales was developed: (a) Gestational stressors, which is formed by two factors, the psychological stressors and social stressors with a variance of 48.5% and 51.8% and a reliability of .79 and .67, respectively; and (b) gestational stress modulators integrated by 8 items that explain 55.2% of the variance and with a reliability of .92. In conclusion, a valid and reliable tool was obtained that measures gestational stress from a bio-psycho-social perspective. This inventory allows for the identification of allostatic and pantostatic stress, making it useful as a diagnostic tool to prevent maternal and childhood complications that are associated with chronic gestational stress.

Keywords

gestational stresspregnancypsychological factorsstress
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 23 , 2020 , e26
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: None

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors Raquel GonzÃlez-Ochoa is recipient of doctoral fellowship from CONACYT. Sara Robledo Waters proofread all the manuscript.

References

Aguirre, A. (2009). La mortalidad infantil y la mortalidad materna en el siglo XXI [Infantile mortality and maternal mortality in XXI century]. Papeles de Población, 15(61), 75–99.Google Scholar
Alderdice, F., & Lynn, F. (2011). Factor structure of the Prenatal Distress Questionnaire. Midwifery, 27(4), 553–559. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alderdice, F., Lynn, F., & Lobel, M. (2012). A review and psychometric evaluation of pregnancy-specific stress measures. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 33(2), 62–77. http://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2012.673040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología [A classification system for research designs in psychology]. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038–1059. http://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor analysis. Exploratory and confirmatory. In Hancock, G. R. & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social science (pp. 93–114). Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnard, K. E. (1989). Difficult life circumstances (DLC). NCAST Publications.Google Scholar
Barroilhet, S., Cano-Prous, A., Cervera-Enguix, S., Forjaz, M. J., & Guillén-Grima, F. (2009). A Spanish version of the Family Assessment Device. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 44(12), 1051–1065. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0022-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borges, P. J., & Ruiz-Barquín, R., & De la Vega Marcos, R. (2017). Análisis y validación psicométrica de una nueva forma de presentación (ordenada) del Perfil de Estados de Ánimo (Valencia, Intensidad, Control) POMS-VIC. RETOS [Analysis and psychometric validation of a new presentation (ordered) of the Profile of Mood State (Valence, Intensity, and Control) POMS-VIC]. Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 32, 82–87.Google Scholar
Chen, M. J., Grobman, W. A., Gollan, J. K., & Borders, A. E. B. (2011). The use of psychosocial stress scales in preterm birth research. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 205(5), 402–434. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrousos, G. P. (2009). Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 5, 374–381. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2009.106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CIA World Factbook (2018). Tasa de mortalidad materna gráfico de barras [Maternal mortality rate bar graph] [Data set]. IndexMundi. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from https://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=2223&l=esGoogle Scholar
Curry, M. A., Burton, D., & Fields, J. (1998). The Prenatal Psychosocial Profile: A research and clinical tool. Research in Nursing & Health, 21(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199806)21:3<211::AID-NUR4>3.0.CO;2-K3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diario Oficial de la Federación de la Secretaría de Gobernación. (2016, April 7). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM–007–SSA2–2016, Para la atención de la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio, y de la persona recién nacida [Official Mexican Standard NOM – 007 – SSA2–2016, For the care of women during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium, and of the newborn]. http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5432289&fecha=07/04/2016Google Scholar
Diego, M. A., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Schanberg, S., Kuhn, C., & Gonzalez-Quintero, V. H. (2009). Prenatal depression restricts fetal growth. Early Human Development, 85(1), 65–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiPietro, J. A., Christensen, A. L., & Costigan, K. A. (2008). The Pregnancy Experience Scale – Brief version. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 29(4), 262–267. http://doi.org/10.1080/01674820802546220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farkas, K., Fillol, M., & Santelices, A. (2006). Actitudes negativas hacia el embarazo y sus consecuencias [Negative attitudes towards pregnancy and its consequences]. In Calcagni, X., & Rivera, J., (Eds.), Adopción: Reparando el abandono [Adoption: Preparing to abandon] (pp. 1–23). Fundación San José.Google Scholar
Frazier, T., Hogue, C. J., & Yount, K. M. (2018). The development of the Healthy Pregnancy Stress Scale, and validation in a sample of low-income African American women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22, 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2396-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. http://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678–686. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.678CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González-Ochoa, R., Córdova-Plaza, R., Hernández-Pozo, R., Sánchez-Silva, D., & Romo-González, T. (2020). Psychological factors as coping skills to attenuate the gestational stress response [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Área de Biología y Salud Integral, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana.Google Scholar
González-Ochoa, R., Sánchez-Rodríguez, E. N., Chavarría, A., Gutiérrez-Ospina, G., & Romo-González, T. (2018). Evaluating stress during pregnancy: Do we have the right conceptions and the correct tools to assess it? Journal of Pregnancy, 2018, 1–20, Article 4857065. http://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4857065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guarino, L. R. (2005). Sensibilidad emocional. Su rol moderador en la relación estrés-enfermedad [Emotional sensitivity its moderating role in the stress-illness relationship]. Psicología Conductual, 13, 217–230.Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th Ed.). Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Hernández-Pozo, M. R., Álvarez-Gasca, M. A., Meza-Peña, C., Romo-González, T., Barahona-Torres, J. I., López-Walle, J. M., Gallegos-Guajardo, J., Monterrubio-García, G. E., Sánchez-Ortiz, E. R., Ojeda-Valencia, A. G., Román-Muñoz, M. G., Sánchez-Rosas, M. G., González-Beltrán, L. F., Galán-Cuevas, S., Góngora-Coronado, E. A., González-Pérez, R., & Gutiérrez-García, J. J. (2020). Psychometric properties of the positive and negative affect questionnaire (PANAS) for Mexican adults [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Grupo de investigación Aprendizaje Humano, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoGoogle Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hompes, T., Vrieze, E., Fieuws, S., Simons, A., Jaspers, L., Van Bussel, J., Schops, G., Gellens, E., Van Bree, R., Verhaeghe, J., Spitz, B., Demyttenaere, K., Allegaert, K., Van den Bergh, B., & Claes, S. (2012). The influence of maternal cortisol and emotional state during pregnancy on fetal intrauterine growth. Pediatric Research, 72(3), 305–315. http://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2012.70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, M. S., Lydon, J., Se´guin, L., Goulet, L., Kahn, R. S., McNamara, H., Genest, J., Dassa, C., Chen, M. F., Sharma, S., Meaney, M. J., Thomson, S., Van Uum, S., Koren, G., Dahhou, M., Lamoureux, J., Platt, R.W., (2009). Stress pathways to spontaneous preterm birth: The role of stressors, psychological distress, and stress hormones. American Journal of Epidemiology, 169(11), 1319–1326. http://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knekta, E., Runyon, C., & Eddy, S. (2019). One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064Google ScholarPubMed
Lazarus, R. (2000). Estrés y emoción. Manejo e implicaciones en nuestra salud [Stress and emotion management and implications on our health]. Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Lobel, M., Cannella, D. L., Graham, J. E., DeVincent, C., Schneider, J., & Meyer, B. A. (2008). Pregnancy-specific stress, prenatal health behaviors, and birth outcomes. Health Psychology, 27, 604–615. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0013242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110. http://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales Carmona, F., & González Campillo, G. (1990). Normalización del instrumento de ansiedad (IDARE) en mujeres embarazadas [Adjustment of the (IDARE) Anxiety Instrument in Pregnant Women]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 7, 75–80.Google Scholar
Nast, I., Bolten, M., Meinlschmidt, G., & Hellhammer, D. H. (2013). How to measure prenatal stress? A systematic review of psychometric instruments to assess psychosocial stress during pregnancy. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 27(4), 313–322. http://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12051CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nepomnaschy, P. A., Welch, K. B., McConnell, D. S., Low, B. S., Strassmann, B. I., & England, B. G. (2006). Cortisol levels and very early pregnancy loss in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(10), 3938–3942. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511183103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio Informe de 2015 [Millennium Development Goals Report 2015]. Retrieved 30 April, 2018, from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/mdg/Resources/Static/Products/Progress2015/Spanish2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
Porges, S.W. (1995). Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A Polivagal Theory. Psychophysiology, 32, 301–318. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raykov, T., & Shrout, P. E. (2002). Reliability of scales with general structure: Point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, J. (1995). Psicología Social de la Salud [Social Health Psychology]. Síntesis.Google Scholar
Robles, R., & Paéz, F. (2003). Estudio sobre la traducción al español y las propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de afecto positivo y negativo (PANAS) [Study on the translation to Spanish and the psychometric properties of the affect scale positive and negative (PANAS)]. Salud Mental, 26(1), 69–75.Google Scholar
Ruiz, R. J., Fullerton, J., & Dudley, D. J. (2003). The interrelationship of maternal stress, endocrine factors and inflammation on gestational length. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 58(6), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200306000-00025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapolsky, M. R. (2004). ¿Por qué las cebras no tienen úlceras? La guía del estrés? [Why zebras don’t get ulcers: The guide of stress] (4th Ed.). Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.Google Scholar
Thompson, B. (2008). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Torres-Lagunas, M. A., Vega-Morales, E. G., Vinalay-Carrillo, I., Arenas-Montaño, G., & Rodríguez-Alonzo, E. (2015 ). Validación psicométrica de escalas PSS–14, AFA-R, HDRS, CES-D, EV en puérperas mexicanas con y sin preeclampsia [Psychometric validation of scales PSS–14, AFA-R, HDRS, CES-D, EV in postpartum Mexican women with and without preeclampsia]. Enfermería Universitaria, 12(3), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reu.2015.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2018). Maternal mortality. Retrieved 30 April, 2018, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/es/Google Scholar