Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:49:20.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distance to the Object and Social Representations: Replication and Further Evidences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2014

Lionel Dany ,
Themis Apostolidis  and
Sofiene Harabi
Lionel Dany*
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université (France)
Themis Apostolidis
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université (France)
Sofiene Harabi
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université (France)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lionel Dany. Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale. Maison de la Recherche. Université d’Aix-Marseille. 29, Avenue Robert Schuman. F-13100. Aix-en-Provence (France). E-mail: Lionel.Dany@univ-amu.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Distance to the object is a new approach that highlights the complex nature of the link between groups and social representations. It is composed of three elements: knowledge, involvement, and level of practices associated with the social object. This study aims to replicate a previous study that has demonstrated the validity of distance to the object in order to explore social representations of cannabis. We carried out a research on the social representations of cocaine. Respondents (n = 200) completed a questionnaire including opinions related to cocaine and constitutive elements of the distance to cocaine. The regression analysis on the representational dimensions revealed a significant effect of the distance variable on two dimensions (social facilitator, addiction and social dangerousness). The groups that were “distant” from the object showed stronger adherence to the normative component than to the functional component of SR, in opposition to those who were “close” to the object. The concept of distance to the object is thus heuristic as it offers an integrative grid of reading that permits to understand and highlight the link individuals maintain with a social representation.

Keywords

social representationsdistance to the objectcocaineFrance
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E87
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abric, J.-C. (1993). Central system, peripheral system: Their functions and roles in the dynamics of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 75–78.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (1994). Pratiques sociales et représentations [Social practices and representations] . Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (2001a). A structural approach to social representations. In Deaux, K. & Philogène, G. (Eds.), Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 42–47). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (2001b). L’approche structurale des représentations sociales: Développements récents [The structural approach of social representations: Recent developments]. Psychologie et Société, 4, 81–103.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C., & Tafani, E. (1995). Nature et fonctionnement du noyau central d’une représentation sociale: La représentation de l’entreprise [Nature and functioning of the central core of a social representations: The representation of company]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 28, 22–31.Google Scholar
Apostolidis, T., & Dany, L. (2012). Pensée sociale et risques dans le domaine de la santé: Le regard des représentations sociales. [Social thought and risks in the health field: The social representations perspective]. Psychologie Française, 57, 67–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2012.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquatias, S., Maillard, I., & Zorman, M. (1999). Faut-il avoir peur du haschich? [Should we be afraid of hashish?] . Paris, France: Syros.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, F., & Peretti-Watel, P. (2000). EROPP 1999: Enquête sur les représentations, opinions et perceptions relatives aux psychotropes [EROPP 1999: Study on representations, opinions and perceptions towards drugs] . Paris, France: OFDT.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courvoisier, N., Clémence, A., & Green, E. G. T. (2013). Man-made black holes and Big Bangs: Diffusion and integration of scientific information into everyday thinking. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 297–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662511405877 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dany, L., & Abric, J.-C. (2007). Distance à l’objet et représentations du cannabis [Distance to the object and representations of cannabis]. International Review of Social Psychology, 20, 77–104.Google Scholar
Dany, L., & Apostolidis, T. (2002). L’étude des représentations sociales de la drogue et du cannabis: Un enjeu pour la prévention [A study on the social representations of drugs and cannabis: The issues and what is at stake for prevention]. Santé Publique, 14, 335–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/spub.024.0335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doise, W. (1986). Les représentations sociales: définition d’un concept [Social representations: Definition of a concept]. In Doise, W. & Palmonari, A. (Eds.), L’étude des représentations sociales [The study of social representations] (pp. 81–94). Geneva, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Doise, W., Clémence, A., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1992). Représentations sociales et analyses de données [Social representations and data analysis] . Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Echebarria, A., Guede, E., Guillen, C., & Garate, J. (1992). Social representations of drugs, causal judgment and social perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 73–84.Google Scholar
Flament, C. (1989). Structure et dynamique des représentations sociales [Structure and dynamic of social representations]. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.), Les représentations sociales [Social representations] (pp. 204–219). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Flament, C. (2001). Pratiques sociales et dynamiques des représentations [Social practices and dynamics of representations]. In Moliner, P. (Ed.), La dynamique des représentations sociales [The dynamic of social representations] (pp. 43–58). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Flament, C., & Milland, L. (2010). La substitution dans les études de représentations sociales : Quel processus impliqué ? [The use of substitution in the study of social representations: What process is involved?]. Psychologie Française, 55, 195–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2010.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flament, C., & Rouquette, M. L. (2003). Anatomie des idées ordinaires [Anatomy of ordinary ideas] . Paris, France: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Green, E. G. T., & Clémence, A. (2008). Discovery of the faithfulness gene: A model of transmission and transformation of scientific information. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 497–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466607X248912 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grize, J.-B., Vergès, P., & Silem, A. (1987). Salariés face aux nouvelles technologies [Employee facing new technologies] . Paris, France: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Gruev-Vintila, A., & Rouquette, M. L. (2007). Social thinking about collective risk: How do risk-related practice and personal involvement impact its social representations? Journal of Risk Research, 10, 555–581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870701338064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerin, B. (1994). Using social representations to negotiate the social practices of life. Papers on Social Representations, 3, 177–183.Google Scholar
Guimelli, C. (1994). Structures et transformations des représentations sociales [Structure and transformations of social representations] . Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Guimelli, C. (1998a). Chasse et nature en Languedoc [Hunting and nature in Languedoc] . Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Guimelli, C. (1998b). Differentiation between the central core elements of social representations: Normative vs. functional elements. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 4, 209–224.Google Scholar
Ingold, R., & Toussirt, M. (1998). Le cannabis en France [Cannabis in France] . Paris, France: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D., & Moscovici, S. (1990). Les représentations dans le champ social [Representations, in the social field]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 3, 285–288.Google Scholar
INSERM (2003). Cannabis: Quels effets sur le comportement et la santé? [Cannabis: Which effects on behavior and health?] . Paris, France: Inserm.Google Scholar
Lo Monaco, G., Apostolidis, T., & Dany, L. (in press). De l’implication «personnelle» à l’implication «psychosociale»: Bilan, approche critique et nouvelles propositions [From “personal” involvement to “psychosocial” involvement: Review, critical approach and new proposals]. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades.Google Scholar
Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2008). Représentations sociales, pratique de consommation et niveau de connaissance: Le cas du vin [Social representations, consumption practices and knowledge levels: The case of wine]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 78, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, I., Valentim, J. P., & Carugati, F. (2012). Degree of proximity in the construction of social representations: The case of intelligence. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 1244–1258. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39411 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miguel, I., Valentim, J. P., & Carugati, F. (2013). Social representations of the development of intelligence, parental values and parenting styles: A theoretical model for analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 1163–1180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0160-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molinari, L., & Speltini, G. (1998). Breast feeding, practices and values: A study of social representations. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 235–247.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1976). La psychanalyse, son image, son public [Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public] . Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Mugny, G., & Carugati, F. (1989). Social representations of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peretti-Watel, P. (2003). Neutralization theory and the denial of risk: Some evidence from cannabis use among French adolescent. British Journal of Sociology, 54, 21–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0007131032000045888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sà, C. P. (1994). Sur les relations entre représentations sociales, pratiques socio-culturelles et comportement [On the relation between social representations, sociocultural practices and behavior]. Papers on Social Representations, 3, 40–46.Google Scholar
Schütz, A. (1987). Le chercheur et le quotidien [The researcher and the daily life] . Paris, France: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tovar, M.-L. (2013). Drogues et addictions, données essentielles [Drugs and addictions, essential datas] . Saint-Denis, France: OFDT.Google Scholar
Voelklein, C., & Howarth, C. (2005). A review of controversies about social representations theory: A British debate. Culture and Psychology, 11, 431–454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X05058586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachelke, J. (2012). Representations and social knowledge: An integrative effort through a normative structural perspective. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 259–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W. (1993). Can representations explain social behaviour? A discussion of social representations as rational systems. Papers on social representations, 2, 236–249.Google Scholar