Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:48:35.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Assessment: the Spanish Version of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2014

Sara Mata  and
M. Dolores Calero
Sara Mata*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
M. Dolores Calero
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sara Mata. Personality, Assessment and Treatment Department. Universidad de Granada. Campus Cartuja S/N. 18071. Granada (Spain). E-mail: saramata@ugr.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the last 30 years, the sphere of educational assessment has been giving consideration to methodology that would focus on the processes more than on the final results obtained. Dynamic Assessment has appeared within this context, making it possible to assess a child’s ability to improve on a certain task after receiving mediated training. One of the techniques developed to assess the learning potential of preschoolers is the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS: Lidz & Jepsen, 2003). The objective of this study was to verify the criterion validity of the Spanish version of the ACFS which was applied to 87 children in the second year of preschool, at which time a learning potential index was obtained for each child. Two years later, the children were reassessed with respect to intelligence, metacognition and scholastic aptitudes. Results showed that learning potential presented evidences of predictive validity regarding to the progression showed on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test’s (K-BIT: Kaufman & Kauffman, 1994) matrices subtest (p = .04, η2 = .04) and on the evaluation subtest of the metacognition questionnaire (p = .02, η2 = .05). Results also showed significant differences between groups on the visual-perceptive aptitude subtest (p = .01) in favor of the children classified as learners.

Keywords

dynamic assessmentlearning potentialpreschoolerscriterion validitylongitudinal study
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E89
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annervita, T., & Vauras, M. (2006). Developmental changes of metacognitive skill in elementary school children. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 195–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200%2FJEXE.74.3.195-226 Google Scholar
Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An international approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 52–81). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Caffrey, E., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). The predictive validity of dynamic assessment: A review. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 254–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022466907310366 Google Scholar
Calero, M. D., Parra, A., López-Rubio, S., Carles, R., Mata, S., Vives-Montero, C., ... Márquez, J. (2013). Variables involved in personal, social and school adjustment in a sample of preschool-aged children from different cultural backgrounds. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 133–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10212-012-0107-8 Google Scholar
Calero, M. D., Robles, M. A., & García-Martín, M. B. (2010). Cognitive skills, behavior and learning potential of preschool children with Down syndrome. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 87–110.Google Scholar
Calero, M. D., Robles, M. A., Márquez, J., & De la Osa, P. (2009). EHPAP: Evaluación de Habilidades y Potencial de Aprendizaje en Preescolares [Assessment of Skills and Learning Potential in Preschoolers]. Madrid, Spain: EOS.Google Scholar
Cordero, A., & Calonge, I. (2000). Adaptación española del K-BIT: Test Breve de Inteligencia de Kaufman [Spanish adaptation of the K-BIT: Kaufman’s Brief Intelligence Test]. In Kaufman, A. & Kaufman, N. (Eds.), K-BIT: Test Breve de Inteligencia de Kaufman (pp. 51–60). Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
De la Cruz, V. (1982). Batería de Aptitudes para el Aprendizaje, BAPAE [Battery of Aptitudes for Learning]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem-solving in grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 435–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F002221940103400505 Google Scholar
Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Juan-Espinosa, M., Colom, R., & Calero, M. D. (1997). Contextual and personal sources of individual differences in intelligence: Empirical results. In Carlson, J. S., Kingma, J., & Tomic, W. (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Reflections on the concepts of Intelligence (pp. 221–274). Greenwich, UK: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002) The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem, Israel: The Icelp Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, A. J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Baker, L. (2006). Development of the metacognitive skills of prediction and evaluation in children with or without math disability. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21, 77–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1540-5826.2006.00208.x Google Scholar
Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge, UK: University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1994). A system for understanding cognitive capabilities. In Determan, D. K. (Ed.), Current topic in human intelligence (pp. 151–203). New Jersey, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Howell, S. C., & Kemp, C. R. (2010). Assessing preschool number sense: Skills demonstrated by children prior to school entry. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 30, 411–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F01443411003695410 Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, A. L. (1994). KBIT: Test Breve de Inteligencia de Kaufman. Manual de interpretación. [KBIT: Kaufman’s Brief Intelligence Test. Interpretation Manual]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Levy, C. (1999). The discriminate validity of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS). A performance comparison between typically developing and special needs preschool children (Unpublished master’s thesis). Touro College, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S. (2000). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): A curriculum based dynamic assessment for preschool children. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 120–145). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S. (2004). Assessment procedure with deaf students between the ages of four and eight years. Educational and Child Psychology, 21, 59–73.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S. (2005). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale: A dynamic assessment procedure for young children. In Tan, O. S. & Seok-Hoon Seng, A. (Eds.), Enhancing cognitive functions: Applications across contexts (pp. 77–101). Singapore, Republic of Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (Eds.), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context (pp. 99–116). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S., & Jepsen, R. H. (2003). Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): Technical manual. Unpublished Manuscript. Touro College, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Manzo, A. V., Manzo, U. C., & McKenna, M. C. (1995). Informal Reading-Thinking Inventory. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Meijer, J., & Elshout, J. (2001). The predictive and discriminant validity of the zone of proximal development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 93–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348%2F000709901158415 Google Scholar
Murray, E., & Harrison, L. J. (2011). The influence of being ready to learn on children’s early school literacy and numeracy achievement. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31, 529–545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F01443410.2011.573771 Google Scholar
Prior, M., Bavin, E., & Ong, B. (2011). Predictors of school readiness in five to six year-old children from an Australian longitudinal community sample. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31, 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F01443410.2010.541048 Google Scholar
Resing, W. C. M. (1993). Measuring inductive reasoning skills: The construction of a learning potential test. In Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues (pp. 219–242). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swanson, H. L., & Lussier, C. M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71, 321−363. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543071002321 Google Scholar
Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1255-4_5 Google Scholar
van der Aalsvoort, G. M., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). A cross-cultural validation study of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24, 91–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300%2FJ370v24n01_05 Google Scholar
Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11409-006-6893-0 Google Scholar
Waldorf, M., Wiedl, K. H., & Schöttke, H. (2009). On the concordance of three reliable change indexes: An analysis applying the Dynamic Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Journal of Cognitive education and Psychology, 8, 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891%2F1945-8959.8.1.63 Google Scholar