Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:21:37.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Employability and Personal Initiative as Antecedents of Job Satisfaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Juan Pablo Gamboa*
Affiliation:
Universitat de Valéncia (Spain)
Francisco Gracia
Affiliation:
Universitat de Valéncia (Spain)
Pilar Ripoll
Affiliation:
Universitat de Valéncia (Spain)
José María Peiró
Affiliation:
Universitat de Valéncia (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Juan Pablo Gamboa Navarro. Departamento de Psicología Social, Facultad de Psicología, Universitat de Valéncia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010, Valencia (Spain). Phone: +34-963390991. Fax: +34-963620471. E-mail: juan.gamboa@uv.es

Abstract

In a changing and flexible labour market it is important to clarify the role of environmental and personal variables that contribute to obtaining adequate levels of job satisfaction. The aim of the present study is to analyze the direct effects of employability and personal initiative on intrinsic, extrinsic and social job satisfaction, clarifying their cumulative and interactive effects. The study has been carried out in a sample of 1319 young Spanish workers. Hypotheses were tested by means of the moderated hierarchical regression analysis. Results show that employability and personal initiative predict in a cumulative way the intrinsic, extrinsic and social job satisfaction. Moreover, the interaction between employability and personal initiative increases the prediction of these two variables on intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction. Results also indicate that higher values of employability when initiative is also high are associated to higher levels of intrinsic and extrinsic satisfaction. These results have implications for theory and practice in a context of new employment relations.

En un mercado laboral cambiante y flexible, es importante clarificar el papel de variables ambientales y personales que permitan obtener niveles adecuados de satisfacción laboral. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el efecto directo de la empleabilidad y la iniciativa personal sobre la satisfacción laboral intrínseca, extrínseca y social, clarificando si esos efectos son acumulativos e interactivos. El estudio se realizó con una muestra de 1319 trabajadores españoles jóvenes. Las hipótesis se probaron por medio del análisis de regresión jerárquica modulado. Los resultados muestran que la empleabilidad y la iniciativa personal contribuyen de forma acumulativa a predecir la satisfacción extrínseca, intrínseca y social y su interacción incrementa la predicción de la satisfacción extrínseca e intrínseca. Los resultados también indican que niveles altos de empleabilidad, cuando la iniciativa personal es alta, se asocian con niveles mayores de satisfacción extrínseca e intrínseca. Estos resultados tienen implicaciones teóricas y prácticas para las relaciones laborales actuales.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, B. W., and Post, J. E. (1996). Beyond the social contract: An analysis of the executive view at twenty-five larger companies. En Hall, D. T. (Ed.), The career is dead – long live the career (pp. 4671). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. B., and Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital. New York: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brkich, M., Jeffs, D., and Carless, S. A. (2002). A Global Self-Report Measure of Person-Job Fit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 4351.Google Scholar
Brown, P., Hesketh, A., and Williams, S. (2003). Employability in a knowledge-driven economy. Journal of Education and Work, 16, 107126.Google Scholar
Capelli, P. (1995). Rethinking employment. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33, 563602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., and Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3ra Ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Erdogan, B., and Bauer, T. N. (2005). Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: the role of fit with jobs and organizations. Personnel Psychology, 58, 859891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frese, M., and Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In Staw, B. M. and Sutton, R. I. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 133187). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., and Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 3763.Google Scholar
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilbuerger, T., Leng, L., and Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrier, A., and Sels, L. (2003). The concept employability: a complex mosaic. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 3, 102124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A., and Ashforth, E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 1438.Google Scholar
García-Montalvo, J., Peiró, J. M., and Soro Bonmatí, A. (2003). Capital Humano. Observatorio de la Inserción Laboral de los Jóvenes: 1996–2002. Valencia: Bancaja-Ivie.Google Scholar
Gazier, B. (1998). Employability: definitions and trends. In Gazier, B. (Ed.), Employability: Concepts and Policies (pp. 3771). Berlin: European Employment Observatory.Google Scholar
Gracia, F. J., Martínez-Tur, V., and Peiró, J. M. (2001). Tendencias y controversias en el futuro de la gestión y el desarrollo de los recursos humanos. In Agulló, E.; and Ovejero, (Eds.), Trabajo, Individuo y Sociedad: Perspectivas psicosociológicas sobre el futuro del trabajo. Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
Guest, D., and Conway, N. (2002). Communicating the psychological contract: An employer perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 12, 2238.Google Scholar
Herriot, P., and Pemberton, C. (1995). New Deals: The Revolution in Managerial Careers. Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Herriot, P., and Pemberton, C. (1997). Facilitating New Deals. Human Resources Management Journal, 7, 4556.Google Scholar
Hillage, J., and Pollard, E. (1998). Employability: developing a framework for policy analysis. London: DfEE.Google Scholar
Kochan, T. A. (1998). Back to Basics: Creating the Analytical Foundation for the Next Industrial Relations System. Paper presented in IRRA 50th Anniversary Meeting, January 3–5. Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Kristof, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., and Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of Individuals' Fit at Work: A Meta-Analysis of Person-Job, Person-Organization, Person-Group, and Person-Supervisor Fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J. P., and Hall, D. T. (2007). Employability during unemployment: Adaptability, career identity and human and social capital. Journal of vocational behavior, 71, 247264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuaid, R.W., and Lindsay, C. (2005). The Concept of Employability. Urban Studies, 42, 197219.Google Scholar
Nunnaly, J. C., and Berstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3ra ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Peiró, J. M., García-Montalvo, J., and Gracia, F. (2002). How do young people cope with job flexibility? Demographic and psychological antecedents of the resistance to accept a job with non-preferred flexibility features. Applied Psychology: AnInternational Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 51, 4366.Google Scholar
Pinazo, D., Peiró, J. M., Carrero, V., and Rosel, J. (1999). Influencia del comportamiento proactivo de carrera en el cambio del desfit positivo de expectativas. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 9, 7394.Google Scholar
Ripoll, P., Rodríguez, I., Hontangas, P., Peiró, J. M., and Prieto, F. (1994). “Perspectivas de empleo”. In Prieto, F. et al. (Dirs.), Los jóvenes ante el ambiente laboral y las estrategias de adaptación (pp. 8187). Valencia: Nau Llibres.Google Scholar
Rothwell, A., and Arnold, J. (2007). Self-perceived employability: development and validation of a scale. Personnel Review, 36, 2341.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (2001). The Idiosyncratic Deal: Flexibility versus Fairness? Organizational Dynamics, 29, 260273.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (2005). I-deals: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D., Ho, V., and Greenberg, J. (2006). I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 31, 977994.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. E. (1999). The Changing Nature of Careers: A review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 25, 457484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stumpf, S. A., Colarelli, S., and Hartman, K. (1983). Development of the Career Exploration Survey (CES). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 191226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., and Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative Approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 10891121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vila, L. E. (2000). The non-monetary benefits of education. European Journal of Education, 35, 2132.Google Scholar
Vila, L. E. (2005). The Outcomes of Investment in Education and People's Well-being. European Journal of Education, 40, 311.Google Scholar