Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:35:35.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How are Social Ties Protective?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2020

Shelley E. Taylor*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles (USA)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Shelley E. Taylor. University of California, Los Angeles. Department of Psychology. 90095 Los Angeles (USA). E-mail: drsetaylor1@gmail.com

Abstract

Social ties are the most important resource human beings have. Although other people can be difficult and challenging, they can also provide protection, solace, and social support, among other benefits. However, some relationships can be toxic and because these adverse conditions can be physiologically taxing, they can negatively affect both mental and physical health. Changes such as these can operate in large part through alterations in the sympathetic nervous system, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system, and the immune system. Much of the benefit of social support is perceptual and stems from the comfort of believing that supportive others can or will be there when times are stressful. The abilities to gain and perceive social support begin early in life and are heavily influenced by the climate of the family. Social support depends, in part, on reciprocity, yet many challenges to receiving support exist. Giving support to others has its own psychological and physiological benefits, although at intense levels, such as demanding caregiving responsibilities, these benefits dwindle. Moreover, social support needs change over time with changing circumstances. Public policy efforts to help people build and capitalize on their potential support networks is essential to maximize the impact of social ties on mental and physical health.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: None

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Bolger, N., & Amarel, D. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458475. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. L., Nesse, R. M., Vinokur, A. D., & Smith, D. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14, 320327. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.14461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, S., Grippo, A. J., London, S., Goossens, L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 238249. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615570616CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2018). Marriage, divorce, and the immune system. American Psychologist, 73, 10981108. http://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repetti, R. L., Taylor, S. E., & Seeman, T. E. (2002). Risky families: Family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 330336. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2021). Health Psychology. 11th Ed. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar