Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:40:02.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reappraisal of Threat Value: Loss of Blocking in Human Aversive Conditioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2013

Yannick Boddez ,
Frank Baeyens ,
Dirk Hermans  and
Tom Beckers
Yannick Boddez
Affiliation:
KU Leuven (Belgium)
Frank Baeyens
Affiliation:
KU Leuven (Belgium)
Dirk Hermans
Affiliation:
KU Leuven (Belgium)
Tom Beckers*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven (Belgium)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tom Beckers. Department of Psychology. KU Leuven. Tiensestraat 102 box 3712, 3000 Leuven (Belgium). E-mail: tom.beckers@ppw.kuleuven.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Non-specificity of fear is a core aspect of what makes anxiety disorders so impairing: Fear does not remain specific to a single stimulus paired with danger, but generalizes to a broad set of stimuli, resulting in a snowballing of threat signals. The blocking procedure can provide a valuable laboratory model for gaining insight into such threat appraisal and generalization processes. We report two experiments in which we induced selective threat appraisal by using a blocking procedure in human aversive conditioning. We subsequently assessed to what extent such selective threat appraisal is sensitive to different kinds of interference. Results illustrate that the maintenance of selective threat appraisal is not guaranteed: Stimuli present during an aversive conditioning event that are initially tagged with a low threat value, can come to be tagged with a higher threat value later on, without additional experience with these stimuli. We argue that such interference in selective threat appraisal might be one of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of non-specific fear.

Keywords

stimulus competitionblockingretrospective revaluationgeneralizationanxiety disorders
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 16 , 2013 , E84
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research reported in this paper was supported by Grants GOA/2007/03 and PF/10/005 of KU Leuven. Tom Beckers is supported by Innovation Scheme (Vidi) Grant 452–09–001 of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Yannick Boddez, Frank Baeyens and Dirk Hermans are affiliated with the Department of Psychology, KU Leuven. Tom Beckers is affiliated with the Department of Psychology, KU Leuven and the Department of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Science Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

References

Baas, J. M. P., van Ooijen, L., Goudriaan, A., & Kenemans, J. L. (2008). Failure to condition to a cue is associated with sustained contextual fear. Acta Psychologica, 127, 581–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.009 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balaz, M. A., Gutsin, P., Cacheiro, H., & Miller, R. R. (1982). Blocking as a retrieval failure: Reactivation of associations to a blocked stimulus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 99–113.Google Scholar
Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., Pineño, O., & Miller, R. R. (2005). Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 238–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.238 Google ScholarPubMed
Beckers, T., Krypotos, A.-M., Boddez, Y., Effting, M., & Kindt, M. (2013). What’s wrong with fear conditioning? Biological psychology, 92, 90–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.015 Google Scholar
Blaisdell, A. P. (2003). The S-R information stream: Where's the filter? Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 38, 146–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02688832 Google Scholar
Blaisdell, A. P., Gunther, L. G., & Miller, R. R. (1999). Recovery from blocking achieved by extinguishing the blocking CS. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 63–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03199432 Google Scholar
Boddez, Y., Baeyens, F., Hermans, D., & Beckers, T. (2011). The hide-and-seek of retrospective revaluation: Recovery from blocking is context dependent in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 230–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021460 Google Scholar
Boddez, Y., Vervliet, B., Baeyens, F., Lauwers, S., Hermans, D., & Beckers, T. (2012). Expectancy bias in a selective conditioning procedure: Trait anxiety increases the threat value of a blocked stimulus. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43, 832–837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.11.005 Google Scholar
Bouton, M. E. (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 976–986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01546-9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, C. K., & Lovibond, P. F. (1996). Expectancy bias in trait anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 637–647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.105.4.637 Google Scholar
Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.99.2.365 Google Scholar
Craske, M. G., Hermans, D., & Vansteenwegen, D. (2006). Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Davey, G. C. L. (1992). An expectancy model of laboratory preparedness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 24–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.121.1.24 Google Scholar
De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2002). A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 289–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724990244000034 Google Scholar
Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60–80.Google Scholar
Dirikx, T., Vansteenwegen, D., Eelen, P., & Hermans, D. (2009). Non-differential return of fear in humans after a reinstatement procedure. Acta Psychologica, 130, 175–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.12.002 Google Scholar
Dopson, J., Pearce, J. M., & Haselgrove, M. (2009). Failure of retrospective revaluation to influence blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 473–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014907 Google ScholarPubMed
Fanselow, M. S. (1998). Pavlovian conditioning, negative feedback, and blocking: Mechanisms that regulate association formation. Neuron, 20, 625–627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81002-8Google Scholar
Hermans, D., Craske, M. G., Mineka, S., & Lovibond, P. F. (2006). Extinction in human fear conditioning. Biological Psychiatry, 60, 361–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.006 Google Scholar
Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In Church, R. M. (Ed.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Lissek, S., Powers, A. S., McClure, E. B., Phelps, E. A., Woldehawariat, G., Grillon, C., & Pine, D. S. (2005). Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1391–1424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.007 Google Scholar
Lissek, S., Rabin, S., Heller, R., Lukenbaugh, D., Geraci, M., Pine, D., & Grillon, C. (2009). Overgeneralization of conditioned fear as a pathogenic marker of panic disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 47–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09030410 Google Scholar
Lovibond, P. F. (2003). Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: Retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 97–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.29.1.97 Google Scholar
Michael, T., Blechert, J., Vriends, N., Margraf, J., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2007). Fear conditioning in panic disorder: Enhanced resistance to extinction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 612–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.3.612 Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2002). Backward and forward blocking in human autonomic conditioning requires an assumption of outcome additivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 311–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724990244000025 Google Scholar
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 809–848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00063-1 Google Scholar
Pineño, O., Urushihara, K., & Miller, R. R. (2005). Spontaneous recovery from forward and backward blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 172–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.172 Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Shanks, D. R. (2010). Learning: From association to cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 273–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100519 Google Scholar
Spruyt, A., Clarysse, J., Vansteenwegen, D., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2010). Affect 4.0: A Free software package for implementing psychological and psychophysiological experiments. Experimental Psychology, 57, 36–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000005 Google Scholar
van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1008 Google Scholar
Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In Spear, N. E. & Miller, R. R. (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Westbrook, R. F., Iordanova, M., McNally, G., Richardson, R., & Harris, J. A. (2002). Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus: Two roles for context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 97–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.28.1.97 Google Scholar