Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:29:53.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validity Evidence of the Spanish Version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire–8 in Colombia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2017

Francisco J. Ruiz ,
Juan C. Suárez-Falcón  and
Diana Riaño-Hernández
Francisco J. Ruiz*
Affiliation:
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz (Colombia)
Juan C. Suárez-Falcón
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain)
Diana Riaño-Hernández
Affiliation:
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz (Colombia)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dr. Francisco J. Ruiz. Facultad de Psicología. Director Doctorado en Psicología. Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz. Bogotá (Colombia). E-mail: Franciscoj.ruizj@konradlorenz.edu.co
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ) is a widely used, 30-item, 5-point Likert-type scale that measures the frequency of negative automatic thoughts as experienced by individuals suffering from depression. However, there is some controversy about the factor structure of the ATQ, and its application can be too time-consuming for survey research. Accordingly, an abbreviated, 8-item version of the ATQ has been proposed. The aim of this study was to analyze the validity evidence of the Spanish version of the ATQ-8 in Colombia. The ATQ-8 was administered to a total of 1587 participants, including a sample of undergraduates, one of general population, and a clinical sample. The internal consistency across the different samples was good (α = .89). The one-factor model found in the original scale showed a good fit to the data (RMSEA = .083, 90% CI [.074, .092]; CFI = .96; NNFI = .95). The clinical sample’s mean score on the ATQ-8 was significantly higher than the scores of the nonclinical samples. The ATQ-8 was sensitive to the effects of a 1-session acceptance and commitment therapy focused on disrupting negative repetitive thinking. ATQ-8 scores were significantly related to dysfunctional schemas, emotional symptoms, mindfulness, experiential avoidance, satisfaction with life, and dysfunctional attitudes. In conclusion, the Spanish version of the ATQ-8 showed good psychometric properties in Colombia.

Keywords

Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire–8confirmatory factor analysiscognitive therapydepression
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 20 , 2017 , E12
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes [Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents]. Psicothema, 12, 314–319.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., … Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, F. B., & Baxter, W. J. (1997). The structure of positive and negative automatic cognition. Cognition & Emotion, 11, 225–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999397379908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cano-García, F. J., & Rodríguez-Franco, L. (2002). Evaluación del lenguaje interno ansiógeno y depresógeno en la experiencia de dolor crónico [Assessment of anxious and depressive self-talk in chronic pain experience]. Apuntes de Psicología, 20, 329–346.Google Scholar
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chioqueta, A. P., & Stiles, T. C. (2004). Norwegian version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: A reliability and validity study. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 33, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070310016031 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chioqueta, A. P., & Stiles, T. C. (2006). Factor structure of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Form A) and the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: An exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 99, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.99.1.239-247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, L. A., Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, J. (1993). What is coefficient alpha: An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daza, P., Novy, D. M., Stanley, M., & Averill, P. (2002). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21: Spanish translation and validation with a Hispanic sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorf, P. A., Hopkins, L. R., & Finch, A. J. Jr. (1984). Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: A reliability and validity study. Psychological Reports, 55, 708–710. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.55.3.708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaf, L. E., Roelofs, J., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2009). Measuring dysfunctional attitudes in the general population: The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (form A) revised. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9229-y CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elosua, P., Mujika, J., Almeida, L. S., & Hermosilla, D. (2014). Procedimientos analítico-racionales en la adaptación de tests. Adaptación al español de la Batería de Pruebas de Razonamiento [Judgmental-analytical procedures for adapting tests: Adaptation to Spanish of the Reasoning Tests Battery]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0120-0534(14)70015-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghassemzadeh, H., Mojtabai, R., Karamghadiri, N., & Ebrahimkhani, N. (2006). Psychometric properties of a Persian-language version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: ATQ-Persian. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 52, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764006062095 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire . Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy. An experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hollon, S. D., & Kendall, P. C. (1980). Cognitive self-statements in depression: Development of an Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01178214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollon, S. D., Kendall, P. C., & Lumry, A. (1986). Specificity of depressotypic cognitions in clinical depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.52 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Lincolnwood, IL: Technical report, Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2 user’s reference guide: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization: A preprocessor for LISREL. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.30. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Joseph, S. (1994). Subscales of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155, 367–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1994.9914786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (1990). Evaluation of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: Negative processes and depression among children. Psychological Assessment, 2, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.2.1.73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C. J. L., & López, A. D. (1996). The global burden of disease and injury series: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Netemeyer, R. G., Williamson, D. A., Burton, S., Biswas, D., Jindal, S., Landreth, S., … Primeaux, S. (2002). Psychometric properties of shortened versions of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402062001008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezu, A. M., Ronan, G. F., Meadows, E. A., & Clure, K. S. (2000). Practitioner’s guide to empirically-based measures of depression. Clinical assessment series. (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
Oei, T. P. S., & Mukhtar, F. (2008). Exploratory and confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ-Malay) in Malaysia. Hong Kong Journal of Psychiatry, 18, 92–100.Google Scholar
Rocha, K., Pérez, K., Rodríguez-Sanz, M., Borrell, C., & Obiols, J. E. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población española [Psychometric properties and normative scores of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in general Spanish population]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 125–139.Google Scholar
Ruiz, F. J., García-Martín, M. B., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., & Odriozola-González, P. (2017). The hierarchical factor structure of the Spanish version of Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 17, 93–101.Google Scholar
Ruiz, F. J., Langer, A. I., Luciano, C., Cangas, A. J., & Beltrán, I. (2013). Measuring experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility: The Spanish translation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire. Psicothema, 25, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2011.239 Google ScholarPubMed
Ruiz, F. J., & Odriozola-González, P. (2016). The role of psychological inflexibility in Beck’s cognitive model of depression. Anales de Psicología, 32, 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, F. J., Riaño-Hernández, D., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., & Luciano, C. (2016). Effect of a one-session ACT protocol in disrupting repetitive negative thinking. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 16, 213–233.Google Scholar
Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., Barón-Rincón, D., Barrera-Acevedo, A., Martínez-Sánchez, A., & Peña, A. (2016). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale Revised in Colombian undergraduates. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlp.2015.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., Cárdenas-Sierra, S., Durán, Y. A., Guerrero, K., & Riaño-Hernández, D. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – II in Colombia. The Psychological Record, 66, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0183-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., Odriozola-González, P., Barbero-Rubio, A., López-López, J. C., Eisenbeck, N., … Gil, E. (2015). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale-Revised. Behavioral Psychology, 23, 287–303.Google Scholar
Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., & Riaño-Hernández, D. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in Colombian undergraduates. Suma Psicológica, 23, 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sumpsi.2016.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahin, N. H., & Sahin, N. (1992). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 334–340.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soler, J., Tejedor, R., Feliu-Soler, A., Pascual, J. C., Cebolla, A., Soriano, J., … Pérez, V. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la escala Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) [Psychometric propoerties of the Spanish versión of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)]. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 40, 18–25.Google Scholar
Zettle, R. D., Webster, B. K., Gird, S. R., Wagener, A. L., & Burdsal, C. A. (2013). Factor structure of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire in a clinical sample. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2013.6.3.280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar