Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:56:15.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validity of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form in a Sample of Spanish Fathers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Ángela Díaz-Herrero*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia (Spain)
José Antonio López-Pina
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia (Spain)
Julio Pérez-López
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia (Spain)
Alfredo G. Brito de la Nuez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia (Spain)
María Teresa Martínez-Fuentes
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be adressed to Ángela Díaz-Herrero. Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Facultad de Psicología. 30100 Campus Universitario de Espinardo. Murcia (Spain). E-mail: adiaz@um.es.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form in a sample of 115 fathers of infants aged between ten and thirty-nine months old. The exploratory factor analysis revealed three reasonably distinct factors, as in the original version of the instrument. The three extracted factors: Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction and Difficult Child accounted for 47.48 % of the variance. The internal consistency coefficients were high in each factor or subscale. These results provided empirical evidence in favour of the reliability and validity of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form in Spanish fathers, and can be useful to elucidate the mechanisms through which stress impacts parenting and permitting to develop more targeted interventions for infants and their families.

El propósito de este estudio fue analizar las propiedades psicométricas de la versión española del Parenting Stress Index-Short Form en una muestra de 115 varones, padres de niños con edades comprendidas entre 10 y 39 meses de edad. El análisis factorial exploratorio destacó tres factores razonablemente distintos, al igual que en la versión original del instrumento. Los tres factores extraídos, denominados Malestar Paterno, Interacción Disfuncional Padres-Hijo y Niño Difícil explicaron el 47.48% de la varianza. Los coeficientes de consistencia interna fueron elevados en cada uno de los factores o subescalas. Estos resultados aportaron evidencia empírica a favor de la fiabilidad y validez del Parenting Stress Index-Short Form en hombres españoles, pudiendo ser útil como instrumento para esclarecer los mecanismos por los que el estrés influye en los padres y para elaborar mejores intervenciones para los niños y sus familias.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abidin, R. R. (1983). The Parenting Stress Index. Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting Stress Index (PSI) manual (3rd ed.), Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. O., & Jones, W. H. (1995). The Parental Stress Scale: Initial psychometric evidence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 463472. doi:10.1177/0265407595123009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, N. J., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development, 71, 127136. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyl, D., Roggman, L., & Newland, L. (2002). Stress, maternal depression, and negative mother-infant interactions in relation to infant attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23, 145163. doi:10.1002/imhj.10009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, L. J., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical & Modern Test Theory. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crnic, K., Gaze, C., & Hoffman, C. (2005). Cumulative parenting stress across the preschool period: Relations to maternal parenting and child behaviour at age five. Infant and Child Development, 14, 117132. doi:10.1002/icd.384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deater-Deckard, K. (2005). Parenting stress and children's development: Introduction to the special issue. Infant and Child Development, 14, 111115. doi:10.1002/icd.383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deater-Deckard, K., & Scarr, S. (1996). Parenting stress among dual-earner mothers and fathers: Are there gender differences?. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 4559. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.10.1.45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dopke, C. A., Lundahl, B. W., Dunsterville, E., & Lovejoy, M. C. (2003). Interpretations of child compliance in individuals at high-and low-risk for child physical abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 285302. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00007-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutermuth Anthony, L., Anthony, B. J., Glanville, D. N., Naiman, D. Q., Waanders, C., & Shaffer, S. (2005). The relationship between parenting stress, parenting behavior and preschoolers' social competence and behavior problems in the classroom. Infant and Child Development, 14, 133154. doi:10.1002/icd.385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In Hambleton, R. K. Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for crosscultural assessment (pp. 338). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Haskett, M. E., Ahern, L. S., Ward, C. S., & Allaire, J. C. (2006). Factor structure and validity of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 302312. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., & Levine, J. A. (1987). Effects of increased parental involvement on fathers and mothers. In Lewis, C. & O'Brien, M. (Eds.), Reassessing fatherhood: New observations on fathers and the modern family (pp. 107125). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lessenberry, B. M., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2004). Evaluating stress levels of parents of children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70, 231244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, B. A., Schoppe, S. J., & Rane, T. R. (2002). Child characteristics, parenting stress and parental involvement: Fathers versus mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 9981011. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00998.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. (1999). Test Theory: A reunified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
McKelvey, L., Whiteside-Mansell, L., Faldowski, R. A., Shears, J., Ayoub, C., & Hart, A. (2009). Validity of the Short Form of the Parenting Stress Index for fathers of toddlers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 102111. doi:10.1007/s10826-008-9211-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oronoz, B., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Balluerka, N. (2007). A Spanish adaptation of the Parental Stress Scale. Psicothema, 19, 687692.Google ScholarPubMed
Reitman, D., Currier, R., & Stickle, T. (2002). A critical evaluation of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) in a Head Start population. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 384392. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3103_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, N. G. (2002). WinFACT 2.1: A microcomputer factor analysis program for ordered polytomous data and mainframe size problems. Minnesota, MN: Assessment System Corporation.Google Scholar
Whiteside-Mansell, L., Ayoub, C., McKelvey, L., Faldowski, R. A., Hart, A., & Shears, J. (2007). Parenting stress of low-income parents of toddlers and preschoolers: Psychometric properties of a Short Form of the Parenting Stress Index. Parenting: Science and Practice, 7, 2756. doi:10.1080/15295190709336775CrossRefGoogle Scholar