Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T03:17:18.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond Group Membership: New Way of Measuring Environmental Interest Group Strength in the American States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2025

Derek Glasgow*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Security Studies, Westminster College, Fulton, MO, USA
Saatvika Rai
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
Shuang Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL, USA
Jami Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
Donald P. Haider-Markel
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
*
Corresponding author: Derek Glasgow; Email: derek.glasgow@westminster-mo.edu

Abstract

Interest groups are an important influence in the subnational policymaking process. Previously, environmental policy scholars measured the strength of environmental groups in the American policymaking subnational process by using proxies like state-level group membership in major nationwide environmental organizations (e.g., Sierra Club). Although these prior measures of group strength have face validity, recent scholarship suggests that the utilization of group financial resources is a better measure of the influence of interest groups in state-level models. We take this approach and provide a new way to measure state-level environmental interests by using aggregated financial information (income and assets) from Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data obtained via the National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS). This measure provides several advantages over previous approaches because it varies over time, is derived from easily accessible public data, includes a greater diversity of environmental organizations, and it is considered reliable by prior scholars. We demonstrate its empirical value by deploying our measure in a model of state policy adoption. We encourage researchers to further utilize this new measure in their analysis of environmental advocacy at the subnational level.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the State Politics and Policy Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Troy D., Salazar, Debra J., and Robert, Patricia. 2015. “States of Environmental Justice: Redistributive Politics across the United States, 1993-2004: States of Environmental Justice.” Review of Policy Research 32(2): 200–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Clinton J. 1998. “Public Policy and the Geography of U.S. Environmentalism.” Social Science Quarterly 79(1): 5573.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, de Figueiredo, John M., and Snyder, James M.. 2003. “Why Is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics?Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(1): 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacot, A. Hunter, and Dawes, Roy A.. 1997. “State Expenditures and Policy Outcomes in Environmental Program Management.” Policy Studies Journal 25(3): 355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, Scott, and Fisher, Shauna. 2003. “The States and the Differing Impetus for Divergent Paths on Same-Sex Marriage, 1990–2001.” Policy Studies Journal 31(3): 331–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barman, Emily. 2013. “Classificatory Struggles in the Nonprofit Sector: The Formation of the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities, 1969–1987.” Social Science History 37(1): 103–41.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M., Berry, Marie, Hojnacki, Beth L., Leech, and David C., Kimball. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, and Caduff, Ladina. 2004. “In Whose Interest? Pressure Group Politics, Economic Competition and Environmental Regulation.” Journal of Public Policy 24(1): 99126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M., and Arons, David F.. 2003. A Voice for Nonprofits. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielefeld, Wolfgang. 2000. “Metropolitan Nonprofit Sectors: Findings from NCCS Data.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29(2): 297314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosso, Christopher J. 2003. “Rethinking the Concept of Membership in Nature Advocacy Organizations.” Policy Studies Journal 31(3): 397411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosso, Christopher J. 2005. Environment, Inc: From Grassroots to Beltway. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Bromley‐Trujillo, Rebecca, Butler, John S., Poe, John, and Davis, Whitney. 2016. “The Spreading of Innovation: State Adoptions of Energy and Climate Change Policy.” Review of Policy Research 33(5): 544–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley-Trujillo, Rebecca, and Holman, Mirya R.. 2020. “Climate Change Policymaking in the States: A View at 2020.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 50(3): 446–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheon, Andrew, and Urpelainen, Johannes. 2013. “How Do Competing Interest Groups Influence Environmental Policy? The Case of Renewable Electricity in Industrialized Democracies, 1989–2007.” Political Studies 61(4): 874–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cigler, Allan J., and Loomis, Burdett A.. 2007. American Politics: Classic and Contemporary Readings. 7th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Cigler, Allan J., Burdett A., Loomis and Anthony J., Nownes, eds. 2015. Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1958. “A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model.” American Political Science Review 52(2): 463–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, Dorothy M., and Garand, James C.. 2005. “Horizontal Diffusion, Vertical Diffusion, and Internal Pressure in State Environmental Policymaking, 1989–1998.” American Politics Research 33(5): 615–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, Riley E., Van Liere, Kent D., Mertig, Angela G., and Jones, Robert Emmet. 2000. “New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale.” Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 425–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, Riley E., and Mertig, Angela G.. 2014. eds. American Environmentalism: The US Environmental Movement, 1970–1990. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, Leslie K. 2019. “Interest Group Influence and the Two Faces of Power.” American Politics Research 47(4): 852–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, Leslie K., and Hartney, Michael T.. 2021. “Financial Solidarity: The Future of Unions in the Post-Janus Era.” Perspectives on Politics 19(1): 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, Derek, Rai, Saatvika, Zhao, Shuang, Taylor, Jami, and Haider-Markel, Donald. 2024, “Beyond Group Membership: New Way of Measuring Environmental Interest Group Strength in the American States.” https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/PYHM3Z, UNC Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:VeXMHNTKBGkMANuG8VgbeQ== [fileUNF]Google Scholar
Glasgow, Derek, Zhao, Shuang, and Rai, Saatvika. 2021. “Rethinking Climate Change Leadership: An Analysis of the Ambitiousness of State GHG Targets.” Review of Policy Research 38(4): 398426. doi:10.1111/ropr.12428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossback, Lawrence J., Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and David, A. M. Peterson. 2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion.” American Politics Research 32(5): 521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 2002. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P. 2001. “Policy Diffusion as a Geographical Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1(1): 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Bob, and Kerr, Mary Lee. 1991. 1991–1992 Green Index: A State-by-State Guide to the Nation’s Environmental Health. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Deardorff, Alan V.. 2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100(1): 6984. doi:10.1017/S0003055406062010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartney, Michael, and Flavin, Patrick. 2011. “From the Schoolhouse to the Statehouse: Teacher Union Political Activism and US State Education Reform Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11(3): 251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2014. “Who Passes Business’s ‘Model Bills’? Policy Capacity and Corporate Influence in U.S. State Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 582602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberg, George. 1992. Pluralism by Design: Environmental Policy and the American Regulatory State. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Hrebenar, Ronald J., and Thomas, Clive. 1992. Interest Group Politics in the Southern States. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Hung, Chi-Kan Richard. 2007. “Immigrant Nonprofit Organizations in US Metropolitan Areas.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36(4): 707–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inman, Katherine, and McLeod, Donald M.. 2002. “Property Rights and Public Interests: A Wyoming Agricultural Lands Study.” Growth and Change 33(1): 91114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Robert. 2006. “A Theory of Consumer Boycotts under Symmetric Information and Imperfect Competition.” The Economic Journal 116(511): 355–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Edward. 1995. “How Environmental Groups Recruit Members: Does the Logic Still Hold Up?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Jones, Elwin, and Jones, Ronald. 2017. “Leadership Style and Career Success of Women Leaders in Nonprofit Organizations.” Advancing Women in Leadership Journal 37: 3748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassinis, George, and Vafeas, Nikos. 2006. “Stakeholder Pressures and Environmental Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 49(1): 145–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Rachel M. 2011. “Symbolic or Substantive Policy? Measuring the Extent of Local Commitment to Climate Protection.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29(1): 4662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 103(3): 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Beth. 2020. “Introduction to the Special Issue on Data Sources for Interest Group Research.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 9(3): 249256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, William R. 2005. “Policy Reversal and Changing Politics: State Governments and Dam Removals.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5(4): 394419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggioni, Elena, Nelson, Hal, and Mazmanian, Daniel A.. 2012. “Industry Influence in Stakeholder-Driven State Climate Change Planning Efforts: Industry Influence in Climate Change Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 40(2): 234–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Amy. 2012. “Buying Policy? The Effects of Lobbyists’ Resources on Their Policy Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65(4): 908–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, Adam J., and Witko, Christopher. 2007. “Pollution, Politics, and Preferences for Environmental Spending in the States.” Review of Policy Research 24(4): 291308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1999. “Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 27(4): 707–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Painter, Matthew A., and Paxton, Pamela. 2014. “Checkbooks in the Heartland: Change over Time in Voluntary Association Membership.” Sociological Forum 29(2): 408–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Political Campaign Activities - Risks to Tax-Exempt Status.” 2015. National Council of Nonprofits. https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/tools-resources/political-campaign-activities-risks-tax-exempt-status (May 4, 2021).Google Scholar
Pollak, Melisa, Meyer, Bryn, and Wilson, Elizabeth. 2011. “Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Lessons from State Climate Action Plans.” Energy Policy 39(9): 5429–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potoski, Matthew, and Woods, Neal D.. 2002. “Dimensions of State Environmental Policies. Air Pollution Regulation in the United States.” Policy Studies Journal 30(2): 208–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rabe, Barry G. 2004. Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Rai, Saatvika. 2020. “Policy Adoption and Policy Intensity: Emergence of Climate Adaptation Planning in US States.” Review of Policy Research 37(4): 444–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringquist, Evan J. 1993. Environmental Protection at the State Level: Politics and Progress in Controlling Pollution. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Ringquist, Evan J. 1994. “Policy Influence and Policy Responsiveness in State Pollution Control.” Policy Studies Journal 22(1): 2543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sale, Kirkpatrick. 1993. The Green Revolution: The Environmental Movement 1962–1992 (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shabecoff, Philip. 2000. Earth Rising: American Environmentalism in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, Elaine B., Daley, Dorothy M., and Lynch, Michael S.. 2011. “Understanding Local Adoption and Implementation of Climate Change Mitigation Policy.” Urban Affairs Review 47(3): 433–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Lowry, William R.. 2001. “Environmental Policy and Party Divergence in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54(2): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Switzer, Jacqueline Vaughn. 1997. Green Backlash: The History and Politics of Environmental Opposition in the U.S. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Steven M., and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2016. “Buzz Kill: State Adoption of DUI Interlock Laws, 2005–11.” Policy Studies Journal 44(4): 491509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jami K., Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Rogers, Benjamin. 2019. “Toward a New Measure of State-Level LGBT Interest Group Strength.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 19(3): 334–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Clive S. and Hrebenar, Ronald J.. 2018. “Changing Patterns of Interest Group Activity: A Regional Perspective.” In The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed. ed. Petracca, Mark P.. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tinkleman, Daniel, and Neely, Daniel. 2011. “Some Econometric Issues in Studying Nonprofit Revenue Interactions Using NCCS Data.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40 (4): 751–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).https://www.bea.gov/ (December 16, 2024).Google Scholar
Vegter, Abigail, Taylor, Jami K., and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2020. “Old and New Data Sources and Methods for Interest Group Research.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 9(3): 436–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vig, Norman J., and Kraft, Michael E.. 2012. Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century 8th Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack. 1983. “The Origins and maintenance of interest groups in America.” American Political Science Review 77(2): 390406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bruce A., and Matheny, Albert R.. 1984. “Testing Theories of Social Regulation: Hazardous Waste Regulation in the American States.” The Journal of Politics 46(2): 428–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, John R. 1996. Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Yi, Hongtao, and Feiock, Richard C.. 2012. “Policy Tool Interactions and the Adoption of State Renewable Portfolio Standards.” Review of Policy Research 29(2): 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Glasgow et al. supplementary material

Glasgow et al. supplementary material
Download Glasgow et al. supplementary material(File)
File 49.1 KB