Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:21:43.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invisible (and Visible) Lobbying: The Case of State Regulatory Policymaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Susan Webb Yackee
Susan Webb Yackee*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
*
Susan Webb Yackee, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Email: syackee@lafollette.wisc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most lobbying is invisible, meaning that interest groups routinely contact government officials “off the public record.” While such lobbying is ubiquitous, whether and how it may affect public policy decision-making remains largely unknown. I theorize that lobbying that employs both invisible and visible tactics is the most influential. I study the development of 38 health-related regulatory policies in Wisconsin to assess this argument. I employ government records, survey data from more than 350 individuals, and interviews with 15 state policymakers. I find that invisible and visible lobbying—when performed in combination—are associated with greater regulatory policy change. From a normative perspective, these results are both reassuring and troubling. On one hand, the results suggest that invisible lobbying, on its own, rarely drives state regulatory policy shifts. Yet, on the other hand, those interested parties with the resources necessary to lobby across multiple modes are more likely to see policy change.

Keywords

state politics and policylobbyinginterest groupspolicymakingrulemakingregulation
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 15 , Issue 3: Special Issue Title: Regulation in the States , September 2015 , pp. 322 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgartner, Frank, and Leech, Beth L.. 1998. Basic Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1977. Lobbying for the People: The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, John T., and Petty, Richard E.. 1979. “Effects of Message Repetition and Position on Cognitive Response, Recall, and Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, John T., and Petty, Richard E.. 1989. “Effects of Message Repetition on Argument Processing, Recall and Persuasion.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 10:3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, John E. 1983. Interest Groups and the Bureaucracy: The Politics of Energy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Christopher A., and Nownes, Anthony. 2003. “Citizen Groups in Big City Politics.” State and Local Government Review 35:102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croley, Stephen P. 1996. “The Administrative Procedure Act and Regulatory Reform: A Reconciliation.” Administrative Law Journal 10:35–49.Google Scholar
Croley, Stephen P. 2000. “Public Interested Regulation.” Florida State University Law Review 28:7–107.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp. 1970. Administrative Law Treatise. 1st ed. San Diego, CA: C.K. Davis.Google Scholar
Furlong, Scott R. 1997. “Interest Group Influence on Rule Making.” Administration & Society 29:325–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, Scott R. 1998. “Political Influence on the Bureaucracy: The Bureaucracy Speaks.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8:39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, Scott R., and Kerwin, Cornelius M.. 2005. “Interest Group Participation in Rule Making: A Decade of Change.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:353–70.Google Scholar
Golden, Marissa Martino. 1998. “Interest Groups in the Rule-Making Process: Who Participates? Whose Voices Get Heard?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8:245–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Christian B., and McGrath, Robert J.. 2011. “Making Rules about Rulemaking: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Political Research Quarterly 64:656–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewell, Christopher, and Bero, Lisa. 2007. “Public Participation and Claimsmaking: Evidence Utilization and Divergent Policy Frames in California's Ergonomics Rulemaking.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17:625–50.Google Scholar
Kagan, Elaine. 2001. “Presidential Administration.” Harvard Law Review 114:2245–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerwin, Cornelius M., and Furlong, Scott R.. 2011. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kerwin, Cornelius M., Furlong, Scott R., and West, William. 2010. “Interest Groups, Rulemaking, and American Bureaucracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy, ed. F., Robert, Durant, . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 590–611.Google Scholar
Klyza, Christopher, and Sousa, David. 2008. American Environmental Policy, 1990–2006: Beyond Gridlock. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Beth L. 2013. Lobbyists at Work. New York: Apress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, and Marchetti, Kathleen. 2012. “You Don't Know Jack: Principals, Agents, and Lobbying.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 1:139–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubbers, Jeffrey S. 2006. A Guide to Federal Agency Rulemaking. 4th ed. Washington, DC: ABA Press.Google Scholar
McCullough, J. Lee, and Ostrom, Thomas M.. 1974. “Repetition of Highly Similar Messages and Attitude Change.” Journal of Applied Psychology 59:395–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Richard L. 1976. “Mere Exposure, Psychological Reactance and Attitude Change.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 40:229–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Robert L., Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., and Salisbury, Robert H.. 1988. “Lawyers and the Structure of Influence in Washington.” Law & Society 22:237–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, Anthony J., and Dealejandro, Krissy Walker. 2009. “Lobbying in the New Millennium: Evidence of Continuity and Change in Three States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9:429–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, Anthony J., and Freeman, Patricia. 1998. “Interest Group Activity in the States.” Journal of Politics 60:86–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1984. “The Effects of Involvement on Reponses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1:69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pildes, Richard H., and Sunstein, Cass R.. 1995. “Reinvesting the Regulatory State.” The University of Chicago Law Review 62:1–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbloom, David H. 2000. Building a Legislative-Centered Public Administration: Congress and the Administrative State: 1946-1999. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, David H. 2003. Administrative Law for Public Managers. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, David H. 2011. “Federalist No. 10: How Do Factions Affect the President as Administrator-in-Chief?” Public Administration Review 71:522–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rourke, Francis E. 1984. Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. 3rd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1984. “Interest Representation: The Domination of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 78:64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T.. 1983. “More of the Same: Washington Pressure Group Activity in a Decade of Change.” Journal of Politics 45:351–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Jason A. 2010. “52 Experiments with Regulatory Review: The Political and Economic Inputs into State Rulemakings.” Institute for Policy Integrity, New York University School of Law, New York.Google Scholar
Terry, Valerie. 2001. “Lobbying: Fantasy, Reality, or Both? A Health Care Public Policy Case Study.” Journal of Public Affairs 1:266–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Wendy E. 2010. “Administrative Law, Filter Failure, and Information Capture.” Duke Law Journal 59:1321–432.Google Scholar
West, William F. 1995. Controlling the Bureaucracy: Institutional Constraints in Theory and Practice. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
West, William F. 2004. “Formal Procedures, Informal Procedures, Accountability, and Responsiveness in Bureaucratic Policymaking: An Institutional Policy Analysis.” Public Administration Review 64:66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, William F. 2005. “Administrative Rulemaking: An Old and Emerging Literature.” Public Administration Review 65:655–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, William F. 2009. “Inside the Black Box: The Development of Proposed Rules and the Limits of Procedural Controls.” Administration & Society 41:576–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Neal D. 2009. “Promoting Participation? An Examination of Rulemaking Notification and Access Procedures.” Public Administration Review 63:518–30.Google Scholar
Yackee, Susan Webb. 2006. “Sweet-Talking the Fourth Branch: Assessing the Influence of Interest Group Comments on Federal Agency Rulemaking.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26:103–24.Google Scholar
Yackee, Susan Webb. 2012. “The Politics of Ex Parte Lobbying: Pre-proposal Agenda Building & Blocking during Agency Rulemaking.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22:373–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yackee, Susan Webb. 2013. “Assessing Regulatory Participation by Health Professionals: A Study of State Health Rulemaking.” Public Administration Review 73:105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar