Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:39:00.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain: The Logic of Legislative Party Switching in the Contemporary American South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Antoine Yoshinaka  and
Seth C. McKee
Antoine Yoshinaka
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
Seth C. McKee*
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA
*
Seth C. McKee, Department of Political Science, Texas Tech University, Holden Hall 16, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA. Email: sc.mckee@ttu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most important career decisions for a legislator is the decision to switch parties, and it raises a theoretical puzzle: it carries significant risk, yet sometimes legislators do change partisan affiliation. We elucidate this puzzle with the first-ever systematic comparison of the entire careers of state legislative switchers and non-switchers in the American South, where the high prevalence of party switching coincided with rapid realignment toward the Republican Party. Our analysis is the first to evaluate all post-switch career decisions (retiring, running for reelection, running for higher office) simultaneously, and it is the broadest in its scope with two full decades of career data. We demonstrate that converts to the Grand Old Party (GOP) pay a reelection cost. However, they are less likely to retire than Democratic non-switchers and more likely to seek higher office. This latter finding is especially strong during the earlier part of our study—when the Republican bench in the South was not as deep and competition for the party label was not as intense. Our findings suggest that political ambition motivates legislators to trade short-term electoral costs for a more promising long-term electoral career with the ascendant party.

Keywords

party switchingAmerican Southambitionreelection coststate legislator
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 259 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul. 1984. “Progressive Ambition in the House: A Probabilistic Approach.” Journal of Politics 46:556–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul. 1985. “A Probabilisitc Approach to Retirement from the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10:107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, David T. 1990. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Canon, David T. 1992. “The Emergence of the Republican Party in the South, from 1964 to 1988.” In The Atomistic Congress: An Interpretation of Congressional Change, eds. Hertzke, Allen D. and Peters, Ronald M. Jr. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 73–105.Google Scholar
Canon, David T., and Sousa, David J.. 1992. “Party System Change and Political Career Structures in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 1998. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23:271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2000. “Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections.” Journal of Politics 62:671–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, Jamie, Crespin, Michael, Eaves, Carrie, and Wanless, Emily. 2011. “Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36:461–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, David, and Fett, Patrick J.. 2000. “Member Goals and Party Switching in the U.S. Congress.” In Congress on Display, Congress at Work, eds. Bianco, William T.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 231–241.Google Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2006. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science 50:62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Kevin, Peterson, Rolfe, and Hadley, Nathan. 2012. “Principled or Opportunist? Perceptions of Arlen Specter and His Party Switch During the 2010 Midterm Election.” American Politics Research 40:880–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 2000. Congress at the Grassroots: Representational Change in the South, 1970-1998. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fleisher, Richard, and Bond, Jon R.. 2004. “The Shrinking Middle in the US Congress.” British Journal of Political Science 34:429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgette, Richard, Garner, Andrew, and Winkle, John. 2012. “The Voting Rights Act, Legislative Elections, and Southern Partisan Change: Conversion or Competition.” Social Science Quarterly 93:291–308.Google Scholar
Glaser, James M. 1996. Race, Campaign Politics, and the Realignment in the South. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, James M. 2001. “When Legislators Change Sides: The Implications of Party Defections in the South.” In Eye of the Storm: The South and Congress in an Era of Change, eds. Kuzenski, John C., Moreland, Laurence W., and Steed, Robert P.. Westport: Praeger, 69–80.Google Scholar
Glaser, James M. 2006. “The Primary Runoff as a Remnant of the Old South.” Electoral Studies 25:776–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian R. 2004. “Is it Better to Join the Majority? The Electoral Effects of Party Switching by Incumbent Southern State Legislators, 1972-2000.” American Review of Politics 25:79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian R., and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2003. “The Electoral Consequences of Party Switching by Incumbent Members of Congress, 1947-2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28:55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny, and McKee, Seth C.. 2008. “Toward A One-Party South?” American Politics Research 36:3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, Alexander. 1952. A Two-party South? Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Heller, William B., and Mershon, Carol. 2005. “Party Switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies.” Journal of Politics 67:536–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, William B., and Mershon, Carol, eds. 2009. Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrick, Rebekah, and Moore, Michael K.. 1993. “Political Ambition's Effect on Legislative Behavior: Schlesinger's Typology Reconsidered and Revisited.” Journal of Politics 55:765–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R. 1982. “Voluntary Retirement from the U.S. House of Representatives: Who Quits?” American Journal of Political Science 26:467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R. 1986. “Ambition in the House: Behavorial Consequences of Higher Office Goals Among U.S. Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 30:651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 2004. “Challenger Emergence, Incumbent Success, and Electoral Accountability in State Legislative Elections.” Journal of Politics 66:1283–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 2008. “Policy Responsiveness and Incumbent Reelection in State Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 52:858–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, M. V. III, Kidd, Quentin, and Morris, Irwin L.. 2012. The Rational Southerner: Black Mobilization, Republican Growth, and the Partisan Transformation of the American South. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, M. V. III, and McKee, Seth C.. 2015. “Sunshine State Dilemma: Voting for the 2014 Governor of Florida.” Electoral Studies 40:293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karol, David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerevel, Yann P. 2014. “Loyalty and Disloyalty in the Mexican Party System.” Latin American Politics and Society 56:93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, Key Valdimer Orlando. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Zeng, Langche. 1993. “An Analysis of Congressional Career Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87:928–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarner, Carl. 2013. “State Legislative Election Returns Data, 2011-2012,”, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:5:Hf0MX1ES3oWKGU3trWPKDg==[fileUNF] Cite Dataset.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl, Berry, Williams, Carsey, Thomas, Jewell, Malcolm, Niemi, Richard, Powell, Lynda, and Snyder, James. 2013. “State Legislative Election Returns Data, 1967-2010,” hdl:1902.1/20401, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:5:q/n5C9RQGfjy6AjbLG6JWQ==.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousser, J. Morgan. 1974. The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-party South, 1880-1910. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David, and Voss, D. Stephen. 2000. “Boll-Weevil Blues: Polarized Congressional Delegations into the 21st Century.” American Review of Politics 21:427–450.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McKee, Seth C. 2010. Republican Ascendancy in Southern U.S. House Elections. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
McKee, Seth C. 2012. “The Past, Present, and Future of Southern Politics.” Southern Cultures 18:95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, Seth C., and Springer, Melanie J.. 2015. “A Tale of ‘Two Souths’: White Voting Behavior in Comtemporary Southern Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 96:588–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, Seth C., and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2015. “Late to the Parade: Party Switchers in Contemporary US Southern Legislatures.” Party Politics 21:957–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mershon, Carol. 2014. “Legislative Party Switching.” In Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, eds. Martin, Shane, Saalfeld, Thomas, and Str⊘m, Kaare W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 418–435.Google Scholar
Mershon, Carol, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2013. Party System Change in Legislatures Worldwide: Moving Outside the Electoral Arena. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2004. “Time, Term Limits, and Turnover: Trends in Membership Stability in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29:357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Adam S. 2018. “Changing Patterns of Uncontested Seats in Southern State Legislative Elections, 1984-2012.” Social Science Quarterly 99:583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Diana Z., and Shomer, Yael. 2013. “A Cross-National Analysis of Party Switching.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38:111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, and Renno, Lucio. 2003. “Successful Re-Election Strategies in Brazil: The Electoral Impact of Distinct Institutional Incentives.” Electoral Studies 22:425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1987. “Realignment: New Party Coalitions and the Nationalization of the South.” Journal of Politics 49:347–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 2004. How Congress Evolves: Social Bases of Institutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1979. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members on the United States House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 23:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Sevi, Semra, Yoshinaka, Antoine, and Blais, André. 2018. “Legislative Party Switching and the Changing Nature of the Canadian Party System, 1867-2015.” Canadian Journal of Political Science. 51:665–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2015. “Individual State Legislator Shor-McCarty Ideology Data, June 2015 update.” Harvard Dataverse, V1. Accessed January 10, 2019..Google Scholar
Shor, Boris, and Tomkowiak, Mateusz. 2010. “The Causes and Consequences of Party Switching in American State Legislatures.” Paper presented at the State Politics and Policy Conference, Springfield, April. Accessed January 10, 2019..Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 1998. “Moving Up or Moving Out: Career Ceilings and Congressional Retirement.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23:419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2012. “Party Building in the South through Conversion.” In The Oxford Handbook of Southern Politics, eds. Bullock, Charles S. III and Rozell, Mark J.. New York: Oxford University Press, 355–381.Google Scholar
Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2016. Crossing the Aisle: Party Switching by U.S. Legislators in the Postwar Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Yoshinaka and McKee supplementary material

Supporting Information

Download Yoshinaka and McKee supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 478.6 KB