No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
‘Bless, O Lord, This Fruit of the New Trees’: Liturgy and Nature in England in the Central Middle Ages*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Extract
In Bede’s dialogue on the book of Genesis, a pupil asks his master, ‘Why did [God] bless man and the animals, but not the trees or the plants?’ And the master replies: ‘He blessed these things in order to increase their generation. [But] trees do not have the sense of perceiving or understanding … Therefore he did not say to the trees: Come forth and multiply.’ This dialogue raises important issues about the benediction of different elements of the natural world. While God did not bless the trees and the plants at the Creation, nevertheless during Bede’s time liturgical compilers were producing a body of material for just such a purpose. By the tenth century, benedictional texts for trees, fruits, nuts, seeds and herbs from different liturgical traditions were routinely included in the service-books of the western Church, petitioning God to multiply their number or else to bestow physical or spiritual well-being on those who used them.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Studies in Church History , Volume 46: God’s Bounty? The Churches and the Natural World , 2010 , pp. 53 - 65
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2010
Footnotes
*
I would like to thank the Editors of Studies in Church History and Sarah Foot, Sarah Hamilton and Sarah Scutts for commenting on this paper.
References
1 Bede, Quaestionum super Genesim ex dictis partum dialogus (PL 93: 259):‘Discipulus: Quare non benedixit arbores et herbas, sed hominem et animalia? Magister: Ideo namque ista benedixit propter propagandi prolem … quìa arbores sensum non habent sentiendi uel intelligendi, animalia sentiunt, et non intelligunt, homo quìdem sentit et intelligit: ideo arboribus non dixit: Crescite et multiplicamini’
2 New Catholic Enyclopedia (Detroit, MI, 2003), s.v. ‘Benedictions’; Little, L. K., Benedictine Maledictions: Liturgical Cursing in Romanesque France (New York, 1993), 92.Google Scholar
3 Thomas, K., Religion and the Decline of Magic (London, 1971), 27–28.Google Scholar
4 Flint, Valerie argued that these sorts of rituals were used by the Church to ‘rescue’ certain forms of magic beneficial to conversion: The Rise of Magic in Early Medieval Europe (Princeton, NJ, 1991), 4.Google Scholar
5 Chenu, M.-D., ‘The Symbolist Mentality’, in Nature, Man and Society in the Twelfth Century: Essays on New Theological Perspectives in the Latin West, ed. and trans. Taylor, J. and Little, L. K. (Chicago, IL, 1968), 99–145, at 129; originally published as La théologie au douzième siècle (Paris, 1957).Google Scholar
6 Liuzza, R. M., ‘Anglo-Saxon Prognostics in Context: A Survey and Handlist of Manuscripts’, Anglo-Saxon England 30 (2001), 181–230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jolly, K. L., Anglo-Saxon Charms in the Context of Popular Religion (Ann Arbor, MI, 1987)Google Scholar; Hall, A., Elves in Anglo-Saxon England: Matters of Belief Health, Gender and Identity (Woodbridge, 2007).Google Scholar
7 With the exception of Rivard, D. A., Blessing the World: Ritual and Lay Piety in Medieval Religion (Washington, DC, 2008).Google Scholar
8 André Vauchez calls them ‘parallel liturgies’. He argues that they were designed ‘to permeate the daily existence of the faithful with religion’: The Spirituality of the Medieval West: the Eighth to the Twelfth Century, trans. C. Friedlander (Kalamazoo, MI,1993). 29.
9 Jolly, K. L., ‘Prayers from the Field: Practical Problems and Demonic Defense in Anglo-Saxon England’, Traditio 61 (2006), 95–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Derek Rivard’s broad survey of medieval benedictions does not go into regional or chronological nuances.
11 Hughes, A., Medieval Manuscripts for Mass and Office: A Guide to their Organization and Terminology (Toronto, ON, 1982)Google Scholar; Palazzo, E., A History of Liturgical Books: From the Beginning to the Thirteenth Century, trans. Beaumont, M. (Collegeville, MN, 1998)Google Scholar; Rasmussen, N. K., Les pontificaux du haut moyen âge:genèse du livre de l’évêque (Leuven, 1998).Google Scholar
12 This is something I will explore further in my Ph.D. thesis, ‘Blessings for Nature in English Liturgical Books, c. 900–1200’.
13 M.-D. Chenu, ‘Nature and Man: The Renaissance of the Twelfth Century’, in Taylor and Litde, eds, Nature, Man and Society, 1–48, at 5.
14 Bartlett, R., The Natural and the Supernatural in the Middle Ages (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
15 M.-D. Chenu,‘Monks, Canons, and Laymen in search of the Apostolic Life’, in Taylor and Litde, eds, Nature, Man and Society, 202–38, at 229.
16 The Sarum Missal, ed. J. Wickham Legg (Oxford, 1916), 455–56.
17 London, BL, MS Stowe 944.
18 Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 391; The Portiforium of Saint Wulstan, ed. A. Hughes, 2 vols (London, 1958–60).
19 Hippolytus of Rome, Apostolic Tradition 3.28.
20 The Old Gelasian survives in a single manuscript: Vatican City, BAV, Reg. Lat. MS 316; see Liber Sacramentorum Romanae AEcclesiae: Vaticanas Reginensis Latinus 316, Fos. 3–245, ed. L. C. Mohlberg (Rome, 1968), 233. See also Chavasse, A., Le Sacramentaire Gélasien (Vaticanus Reginensis 316) (Tournai, 1958), 461–69.Google Scholar
21 For full discussions of the development of the Frankish liturgy, see McKitterick, R., The Frankish Church and the Carolingian Reforms, 789–895 (London, 1977)Google Scholar; Hen, Y., The Royal Patronage of Liturgy in Frankish Gaul to the Death of Charles the Bald, 877 (London, 2001)Google Scholar. Gelasian blessings were preserved in so-called ‘developed’ Gregorians: Pfaff, R. W., ‘Massbooks’, in idem, ed., The Liturgical Books of Anglo-Saxon England (Kalamazoo, MI, 1995), 7–34, at 11.Google Scholar
22 It is possible that these terms are influenced by the Post-Tridentine Rituale Romanum. See, e.g., The Bobbio Missal:A Gallican Mass-Book [MS. Paris Lat. 13246], ed. E.A. Lowe, A. Wilmart and H.A. Wilson, 3 vols (London, 1917–24); The Leofric Missal, ed. N. Orchard, 2 vols (London, 2002).
23 See The Liber Vitae of the New Minster and Hyde Abbey, Winchester, ed. S. Keynes (Copenhagen, 1996); idem, ‘The Liber Vitae of the New Minster, Winchester’, in Rollason, D. et al., eds, The Durham Liber Vitae and its Context (Woodbridge,2004), 149–63, esp. 156–60.Google Scholar
24 N. P. Brooks,‘Introduction: How do we know about St Wulfstan?’, in Barrow, J. S. and Brooks, N. P., eds, St Wulfstan and his World (Aldershot, 2005), 1–21, at 14Google Scholar; William of Malmesbury, Vita Wulfstani, ed. Winterbottom, M. and Thomson, R. M., William of Malmesbury: Saints’ Lives (Oxford, 2002), 7–157, at 110.Google Scholar
25 S. Rankin, ‘Some Reflections on Liturgical Music at Late Anglo-Saxon Worcester’, in Brooks, N. and Cubitt, C., eds, St Oswald of Worcester: Life and Influence (London, 1996), 325–48.Google Scholar
26 Durham, Cathedral Library, MS A.IV.19, fol. 47. See The Durham Ritual (Durham Cathedral Library A.IV. io), ed. T.J. Brown (Copenhagen, 1969).
27 Latham, R. E., Revised Medieval Latin Word-List from British and Irish Sources (London, 1965), s.v.‘Herba’.Google Scholar
28 For example, Hen, Y., Culture and Religion in Merovingian Gaul, A.D. 481–751 (Leiden, 1995), 49–50.Google Scholar
29 J.-C. Schmitt, ‘Religion, Folklore and Society in the Medieval West’, in Little, L. K. and Rosenwein, B. H., eds, Debating the Middle Ages: Issues and Readings (Oxford, 1998), 376–87, at 382.Google Scholar
30 Hen, Royal Patronage, 77–78.
31 Pfaff, R. W., ‘Prescription and Reality in the Rubrics of Sarum Rite Service Books’, in idem, ed., Liturgical Calendars, Saints and Services in Medieval England (Aldershot, 1998), 197–205, at 204.Google Scholar
32 Chenu,‘Symbolist Mentality’, 129.
33 Scribner, R. W., Popular Culture and Popular Movements in Reformation Germany (London, 1987), 40.Google Scholar
34 Chavasse, Le Sacramentaire Gélasien, 468–69.
35 Meaney, A., ‘The Practice of Medicine in England about the Year 1000’, Social History of Medicine 13 (2000), 221–37, at 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Scribner, Popular Culture, 40; Jolly,‘Prayers from the Field’, 102.
37 Chavasse, Le Sacramentaire Gélasien, 468–69.
38 Ward, B., Miracles and the Medieval Mind: Theory, Record and Event, 1000–1215 (London, 1982), 11.Google Scholar
39 Primarily in AElfric’s St Bartholomew’s Day Homily; see Meaney, ‘The Practice of Medicine’, 233.
40 Ibid. 232.
41 The audience for AElfric’s Homilies is much debated; for a helpful summary, see J. Wilcox,‘AElfric in Dorset and the Landscape of Pastoral Care’, in Tinti, F., ed., Pastoral Care in Late Anglo-Saxon England (Woodbridge, 2005), 52–62.Google Scholar
42 Currently being explored in my Ph.D. thesis.
43 All formulae from the Portiforium are transcribed from the manuscript by the author and collated with Hughes’s edition. Those from the Liber Vitae are transcribed by the author.
44 Cockayne, T. O. and Singer, C., Leechdoms, Wortcnning and Starcraft in Early England, 3 vols (London, 1961), 3: 79.Google Scholar