Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:01:05.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecclesiastical jurisdiction in England 1300—1550: the records and their interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Dorothy Owen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

    The picture drawn by Chaucer in the Friar’s Tale is a little journalistic, not to say sensational, and it deals with only some aspects of the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of his day, yet it leaves us in no doubt as to the importance of the courts, and of the way in which they were regarded in some quarters. Perhaps the picture was overdrawn, and true only of the half century or so within Chaucer’s own knowledge. On the other hand it has recently been demonstrated that these same courts furnished some at least of the excuses for royal and parliamentary action at the outset of the reformation, and there seems to be good reason for a closer look at them in this context. Most of all, however, for those whose principal interest is the quality of medieval life, it is desirable to consider the institution during the whole period for which there is some sort of continuous record of its working, that is, for the years covered by my title. There is no doubt that such a study should reveal a considerable section of the public and private life of the time, and while in the limits of this paper I can do no more than skim the surface of my material I hope that I shall persuade others to make further and deeper studies.

    Type
    Research Article
    Information
    Studies in Church History , Volume 11: The Materials Sources and Methods of Ecclesiastical History , 1975 , pp. 199 - 221
    Copyright
    Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1975

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    References

    1 The Canterbury Tales, trans Coghill, N. (rev ed London 1972) p 311 Google Scholar.

    2 Kelly, M., ‘The submission of the ordinaries’, TRHS, 5 ser, 15 (1965) pp 97– 120 Google Scholar, and Bowker, [M.], ‘Some archdeacons’ court books [and the commons’ supplication against the ordinaries of 1532’], Bullough, [D.A.] and Storey, [R.L.], [The Study of Medieval Records] (Oxford 1971) pp 282–316 Google Scholar.

    3 Report of the Commissioners appointed to inquire into the Constitution and Working of the Ecclesiastical Courts (London 1883) i, pp 21-51.

    4 Sexti Decret, lib. 1, tit. xvii, c. vii.

    5 I hope to publish an edition of this register for the Canterbury and York Society.

    6 Donahue, C. and Gordus, J.P., ‘A case book from Archbishop Stratford’s Audience Book’, Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law, ns 2 (Berkeley 1972) pp 45–59 Google Scholar.

    7 This will form the last volume of the Canterbury and York edition of Martival’s register, and is in the press.

    8 Thompson, [A.H.], [The English Clergy and their Organisation in the later Middle Ages] (Oxford 1947) pp 206-46Google Scholar; Bowker, [M.], [An] Episcopal Court Book [for the diocese of Lincoln], LRS 61 (1967)Google Scholar.

    9 Hudson, Anne, ‘The Examination of Lollards’, BIHR 46 (1973) pp 145-9Google Scholar.

    10 D. M. Owen, ‘The records of the bishop’s official at Ely’, Bullough and Storey, pp 189-205; Dunning, R.W., ‘The Wells Consistory court in the Fifteenth century’, Proceedings of the Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society, 106 (Taunton 1962) pp 54–61 Google Scholar; Bannister, A.T., ‘Visitation returns of the diocese of Hereford in 1397’, EHR, 44 (1929) pp 279-89, 444-53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

    11 Morris, C.E., ‘The commissary of the bishop in the diocese of Lincoln’, JEH, 10 (1959) pp 50–65 Google Scholar, and ‘A consistory court in the middle ages’, JEH, 14 (1963) pp 150-9; Bowker, ‘Some archdeacons’ court books’. For lists and locations of episcopal archives see Owen, D.M., Records of the Established Church in England (London 1970)Google Scholar, and Archives, 10 (London 1970) pp 53-6; see also Woodcock, [B.L.], [Medieval Ecclesiastical Courts in the diocese of Canterbury] (Oxford 1952)Google Scholar.

    12 L[incolnshire] A[rchives] O[ffice] Dean and Chapter MS A.1.19; compare Gransden, A., ‘Some 13th century records of an ecclesiastical court in the archdeaconry of Sudbury’, BIHR, 32 (1959) pp 62-9Google Scholar.

    13 Special and General Reports made to His Majesty by the Commissioners appointed to inquire into the practice and jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Courts (repr London 1856) pp 582-9; Hale, [W.H.], A Series of Precedents and Proceedings in Criminal Causes 1471-1640, ed Dunning, R.W. (Edinburgh 1973)Google Scholar; Moore, [A.P.], [‘Proceedings of the ecclesiastical courts in the archdeaconry of Leicester’], AASR, 28 (1905-6) pp 117–220, 593-662Google Scholar; Bowker, ‘Some archdeacons’ court books’; McClaren, C.A., ‘An early sixteenth century act book of the diocese of London,’ Journal of the Society of Archivists, 2,no 7 (London 1968) pp 336-40Google Scholar.

    14 Parry, J.H., Registrum Johannis Gikberti episcopi Herefordensis, CYS, 18 (1915) p. 36 Google Scholar; Carlisle Joint Record Office MS DRC2/7, 8, 21; E[ly] D[iocesan] R[ecords] MS D 2/1, fol 153. A fragmentary court book of a Worcester decanal court for the year 1300 has been published by Pearson, F.S., Collectanea, Worcestershire Historical Record Society 29 (Worcester 1912)Google Scholar.

    15 This was forbidden by the canons of the provincial council of Oxford, 1222, Powieke, F.M. and Cheney, C.R., Councils and Synods (Oxford 1964) p 113 Google Scholar.

    16 Chew, H.M., Hemingby’s Register, Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, Records Branch, 17 (Trowbridge 1962) nos 308-9Google Scholar; LAO, Dean and Chapter MS A.2.31; Fowler], [J.T., Acts of Chapter [of the Collegiate Church of St. Peter and St. Wilfred, Ripon, 1452-1506], SS, 64 (1875)Google Scholar; Johnson, C., Registrum Hamonis de Hethe, 1, CYS 48 (1948)Google Scholar; Cooke, A.M., Act book of the ecclesiastical court of Whalley l510-1533, Chetham Society, ns 44 (Manchester 1901)Google Scholar; Hertfordshire Record Office MS ASA/1AR, Register Stonham, briefly described by Hodge, C.E. in LQR, 49 (1933) pp 269 et seq Google Scholar.

    17 I have discussed some of these disputes in John Lydford’s Book, Historical Manuscripts Commission and Devon and Cornwall Record Society, forthcoming.

    18 Churchill, I.J., Canterbury Administration, Church Historical Society (London 1933)Google Scholar; Woodcock, pp 6-14; ‘Dean and Chapter of Canterbury’, HMCR, 5 (London 1876) pp 426-62; ‘acts, inhibitions and other proceedings in ecclesiastical courts occur in every division of the Carte Antique’.

    19 Brentano, R., York Metropolitical Jurisdiction and Papal Judges Delegate (University of California 1959)Google Scholar; Smith, D.M., A guide to the Archive Collections in the Borthwick Institute of Historical Research (York 1973) pp 52–61 Google Scholar.

    20 I am very grateful to Mrs Gurney and her staff at York for the facilities they have afforded me, and also to Miss Penelope Morgan, Mr F. B. Stitt, Mr P. Walne and Dr Felix Hull for permitting access to collections in their care.

    21 Sayers, [J.E.], [Papal Judges Delegate in the Province of Canterbury 1198-1254] (Oxford 1971)Google Scholar.

    22 Maitland, F.W., Roman Canon Law in the Church of England (London 1898)Google Scholar passim; Cheney, C.R., English Synodalia of the Thirteenth Century (new imp Oxford 1968)Google Scholar passim.

    23 A start has been made by Dr R. Houlbrooke’s Oxford D Phil thesis ‘Church courts and people in the diocese of Norwich 1519-70’ (1970), and Mr C. A. McClaren’s M Litt thesis (1972) on a London vicar general’s book.

    24 Cambridge University Archives, Consistory probate records, liber B, fols 1-99.

    25 Stone, E.D., Norwich Consistory Court Depositions 1419-1512 and 1518-30, Norfolk Record Society, 10 (Norwich 1938)Google Scholar.

    26 EDR MS D2/1, fol 106v.

    27 Thompson, pp 55-6; Bowker, Episcopal Court Book, p x; Hethe, pp 197, 237-9; Haines, R.M., A calendar of the register of Wolstan de Bransford, bishop of Worcester 1339-49, Worcestershire Historical Society, 4 (Worcester 1966) pp 504-9Google Scholar.

    28 Martival, v, nos 137, 50, 34, 57.

    29 EDR MS G1/5, fols 130v-133v.

    30 Lydford, nos 206, 209; Shirley, W.W., Fasciculi Zizaniorum magistri Johannis Wyclif, cum tritico, RS 5 (1858) pp 318 Google Scholar et seq.

    31 Lefebre, L., ‘Procédure’, DDC 7 (1965) cols 285-96Google Scholar; Woodcock, part ii, passim; Sayers, pp 42-99.

    32 BM MS Harley 862, fols 189-91, 39v.

    33 Lichfield Joint Record Office MS B/C/1, fols 3v-5.

    34 Mansi, 22 (1778) cols 1022-3.

    35 EDR MS D2/1, fols 57,v 65, 82, 162v.

    36 At Rochester in 1347-8: 30 instance causes and 123 corrections; 30% matrimonial, 23% tithe, 17% each probate and defamation, 10% perjury and 3% usury. At Ely in 1374-81: 177 instance and 70 corrections; 33% defamation, Whalley 1510-38: 29 instance, 250 corrections; 45% matrimonial, 17% each, tithe and probate, 14% defamation, 7% perjury.

    37 Cox, J.C., ‘Ancient Documents relating to tithes in the Peak’, Journal of the Derbyshire Natural History Society, 5 (Derby 1883) pp 129-64Google Scholar; Lancashire Record Office MSS DDC1, 1050, and DDM 19/11, partially printed in Transactions of the Historical Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, 82 (Liverpool 1930) pp 136-61, and 101 (1949) PP 47-62; Slatter, M.D., ‘The records of the court of Arches’, JEH, 4 (1954) pp 139-5Google Scholar.

    38 BM MS Harley 862, fol 20. This early fifteenth-century compilation uses much Exeter material and is drawn largely from the practice of two Devon notaries, John and Robert Stephen, but it includes causes from Wells, Lincoln, Oxford and Salisbury.

    39 Ibid fols 49-53.

    40 Y[ork] B[orthwick] Institute] MS CPE 13/21.

    41 YBI, MSS CPE 15, 17, 19, 25.

    42 YBI, MS CPE 208.

    43 YBI, MS CPF 89.

    44 YBI, MS CPF 104.

    45 YBI, MSS CPF 33, 62; CPE 248.

    46 Moore, p 626.

    47 Lancashire Record Office MS DDM 19/11/A.

    48 EDR MS D2/1, fol 62v; Randolph, F.C.Hingeston, Register of John de Grandis- son, ii (Exeter 1897) PP 807-8Google Scholar.

    49 YBI MS CPE 132.

    50 YBI, MS CPE 177; LAO, MS Ben 3/78; Ely Dean & Chapter, sacrist’s roll, 1416; Woodcock, pp 135-6.

    51 YBI, MSS CPE 50; CPF 10.

    52 Adams, N., ‘The judicial conflict over tithes’, EHR, 52 (1937) pp 1–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; A. G Little, ‘Personal tithes’, ibid pp 67-88.

    53 YBI, MSS CPE 98, 162, 234.

    54 EDR MS D2/1, fols 114v, 145.

    55 EDR MS A/6/1, p 53 and BM MS Harley 862, fol 197.

    56 YBI, MSS CPE 123, 230.

    57 BM MS Harley 862, fols 148v, 209.

    58 YBI, MS CPF 150.

    59 YBI, MS CPE 90.

    60 Sheehan, M., ‘Formation and stability of marriage in fourteenth century England’, Medieval Studies, 33 (Toronto 1971) pp 28–63 Google Scholar; Helmholz, R.H., ‘Adjuration sub pena nubendi in the church courts of medieval England’, The Jurist, 32 (1972) pp 80–90 Google Scholar, and a forthcoming book.

    61 YBI, MS CPE 87.

    62 Acts of Chapter p 33.

    63 Ely consistory probate, liber B, fols 65v, 66; Hertforshire Record Office MS ASA/1AR, fol 76.

    64 YBI, MS CPE 22.

    65 Lichfield Joint Record Office MS B/C/1/2, fol 16.

    66 EDR MS D2/1, fols 43v-44v; YBI, MS CPE 194, CPF 82.

    67 YBI, MSS CPE 180, 199, 204, 224; CPF 1, 52, 77, 80.

    68 EDR MS D2/1, fols 126-8.

    69 Ibid, fols 123, 82v-85; BM MS Harley 862, fol 199.

    70 EDR MS D2/1,fol 57v.

    71 YBI, MS CPF 63.