Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:25:30.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constraints on Galaxy Formation from Extragalactic Globular Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Jean P. Brodie
Jean P. Brodie*
Affiliation:
Lick Observatory University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The merger model for elliptical galaxy formation has received increasing attention since it was first suggested by Toomre & Toomre (1972). Van den Bergh (1984) pointed out a problem with the idea that elliptical galaxies were formed by simply combining two, or more, spiral galaxies. He noted that the specific frequency (SN, number of globular clusters per unit galaxy light) is systematically lower for spirals than for ellipticals. Schweizer (1987) suggested that globular clusters might be expected to form in the merger process, thereby alleviating or possibly eliminating the SN problem. Ashman & Zepf (1992) developed this idea into a merger model for globular cluster formation with testable predictions.

Type
Conference Papers in order of Presentation
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 187: Cosmic Chemical Evolution , 2002 , pp. 175 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 

References

Ashman, K.M., & Zepf, S.E. 1992, ApJ, 384, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S.W., & Fabian, A.C. 1997, MNRAS, 286, 583.Google Scholar
Brodie, J.P., & Huchra, J.P. 1990, ApJ, 362, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, J.P., & Huchra, J.P. 1991, ApJ, 379, 157.Google Scholar
Brodie, J.P., Schroder, L.L., Huchra, J.P., Phillips, A.C., Kissler-Patig, M., & Forbes, D.A. 1997, AJ submitted.Google Scholar
Bruzual, G., & Chariot, S. 1997, in preparation.Google Scholar
Burstein, D., Faber, S.M., Gaskell, C.M., Krumm, N. 1984, ApJ, 287, 586.Google Scholar
Fabian, A.C., Nulsen, P.E.J., & Canizares, C.R. 1984, Nature, 310, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, D., Brodie, J.P., & Grillmair, C. 1997, AJ, 113, 1652.Google Scholar
Forbes, D.A., Grillmair, C.J., Williger, G.M., Elson, R.A.W., & Brodie, J.P. 1997, MNRAS, in press.Google Scholar
Fritze-v. Alvensleben, U. & Burkert, A. 1995, A&A, 300, 58.Google Scholar
Fritze-v. Alvensleben, U. & Kurth, O. 1997, in preparation.Google Scholar
Harris, W.E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487.Google Scholar
Holtzman, J.A., et al. 1992, AJ, 103, 691.Google Scholar
Kissler-Patig, M., Kohle, S., Hilker, M., Richtler, T., Infante, L., Quintana, H. 1997, A&A, 319, 470.Google Scholar
Kissler-Patig, M. 1997, , .Google Scholar
Kissler-Patig, M., Kohle, S., Richtler, T., et al. 1997, A&A, 319, 470.Google Scholar
Kissler-Patig, M., Brodie, J.P., Schroder, L.L., Forbes, D.A., Grillmair, C.G., & Huchra, J.P. 1998, AJ in press, January issue.Google Scholar
Lazareff, B., Castets, A., Kim, D.W., & Jura, M. 1989, ApJ, 336, L13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madore, B.F., Freedman, W.F. Silberman, N.A. et al. 1997, Nature, in press.Google Scholar
N⊘rgaard-Nielson, H.U., Goudfrooij, P., Jorgensen, H.E., & Hansen, L. 1993, AA, 279, 61.Google Scholar
Ostrov, P., Geisler, D., Forte, J.C. 1993, AJ, 105, 1762.Google Scholar
Rich, R.M., Sosin, G., Djorgovski, S.G., et al. 1997, ApJ, 484, L25.Google Scholar
Richer, H., Crabtree, D., Fabian, A., & Lin, D. 1993, AJ, 105, 877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E.P. et al. 1992, ApJ, 395, L49.Google Scholar
Toomre, A., Toomre, J., 1972, ApJ 178, 623.Google Scholar
Worthey, G., Faber, S.M., & Gonzales, J.J. 1992, ApJ 398, 69.Google Scholar
Worthey, G. 1994, ApJS, 95, 107.Google Scholar