Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:32:15.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Narrow Emission Lines to Test Physical Models Unifying AGNs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

Steve Rawlings  and
Richard Saunders
Steve Rawlings
Affiliation:
Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge CB3 0HE, England
Richard Saunders
Affiliation:
Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge CB3 0HE, England

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We contend that quantitative measurements of nuclear narrow emission line strength can strongly constrain models that unify AGNs. The reasons for the importance of narrow-line luminosity LNLR are:

  1. a) The lines normally arise via photoionisation by the integrated UV/soft X-ray luminosity LPHOT of the central source. Thus LNLR is directly linked to a physical quantity intimately connected with the central engine but not observable from the ground. For constant covering factor we expect an approximate proportionality between LNLR and LPHOT; this has been confirmed observationally for AGNs by estimating LPHOT from either optical non-stellar luminosity or effective ionisation parameter.

  2. b) NLRs are far enough from the photoionising source to avoid the excessive obscuration that appears able to attenuate broad-line and continuum emission. Narrow-lines are radiated isotropically unlike, eg, the radio core which may be Doppler boosted. Their variability timescale of 103–4 years is intermediate between those of LPHOT and any large-scale radio emission.

Type
Part 5: Structure of the Central Object and NLR
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 134: Active Galactic Nuclei , 1989 , pp. 305 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1989 

References

1 Yee, , 1980, Ap J 241, 894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Robinson, et al., 1987, MNRAS 227, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Saunders, et al., in preparation.Google Scholar
4 Antonucci, , 1984, Ap J 278, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Rawlings, & Saunders, , 1987, MRAO Cavendish preprint no. 1294.Google Scholar
6 Rees, et al, 1982, Nature 295, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar