Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:04:48.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental health tribunals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

H. Crimlisk  and
M. Phelan
H. Crimlisk
Affiliation:
Bethlem & Maudsley NHS Trust
M. Phelan
Affiliation:
PRISM, Institute of Psychiatry London SE5 8AF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 167 , Issue 1 , July 1995 , pp. 116 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

Bradley, C., Marshall, M. & Gath, D. (1995) Why do so few patients appeal against detention under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act? British Medical Journal, 310, 364–367.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1983) Mental Health Act 1983. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Peay, J. (1989) Tribunals on Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peay, J. (1995) The challenge of individual rights. Mental health review tribunals. British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 417–420.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1991) Problems of review and discharge: is tribunal necessary? Journal of the Royal Society of Health, June, 111–113.Google Scholar
Wessely, S. & Blumenthal, S. (1994) Patterns of delay in mental health review tribunals. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Webster, L. & Dean, C. (1989) The working of the 1983 Mental Health Act: the experience of patients, relatives, psychiatrists, general practitioners and social workers involved in compulsory admission. Psychiatric Bulletin, 13, 477–479.Google Scholar
Wood, J. (1993) Reform of the Mental Health Act 1983–an effective tribunal system? British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 14–22.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.