Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:59:17.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychiatric Experience of the Abortion Act (1967)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Norman A. Todd
Norman A. Todd*
Affiliation:
Leverndale Hospital and The Victoria Infirmary, Glasgow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Public controversy surrounds the workings of the Abortion Act and will no doubt continue to do so, probably until such time as surgical operation is replaced by other methods. Recently the report has been published of the enquiry by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists which emphasises the difficulties involved in interpretation of the Act and the variations encountered in practice. There is a substantial body of psychiatric literature on the subject, e.g., Ekblad, 1955; Arkle, 1957; Kummer, 1963; Sim, 1963; Höök, 1963; Baird, 1967; Clark et al., 1968 and Kenyon, 1969, but results obtained in other countries and in this country some years ago are not necessarily applicable to this country now, since changes in public attitudes are likely to influence them. Little has been published by psychiatrists about their experience with cases since the Act came into operation. The recent follow-up series of Pare and Raven deals with cases seen in the years 1962 to 1968, i.e., mainly before the implementation of the Act.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 119 , Issue 552 , November 1971 , pp. 489 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkle, J. (1957). ‘Termination of pregnancy on psychiatric grounds.’ Brit. med. J., i, 558–60Google Scholar
Baird, D. Sir (1967). ‘Sterilization and therapeutic abortion in Aberdeen.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 701–9.Google Scholar
Clark, M., Forstner, I., Pond, D. A., and Tregold, R. F. (1968). “Sequels of unwanted pregnancy.’ Lancet, ii, 501–3.Google Scholar
Ekblad, M. (1955). ‘Induced abortion on psychiatric grounds.’ Acta psychiat. Scand., Suppl. 99.Google Scholar
Høøk, K. (1963). ‘Refused abortion: a follow-up study of 249 women whose applications were refused by the National Board of Health in Sweden.’ Acta psychiat. Scand., Suppl. 168.Google Scholar
Kenyon, F. E., (1969). Brit. J. med. Psychol., 42, 243.Google Scholar
Kummer, (1963). ‘Post-abortion psychiatric illness—a myth?’ Amer. J. Psychiat., 119, 10.Google Scholar
Pare, C. M. B., and Raven, H. (1970). Lancet, i, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1970). Brit. med. J., ii, 529.Google Scholar
Scottish Home and Health Department, Health Bulletin, July 1969, 60.Google Scholar
Sim, M. (1963). ‘Abortion and the psychiatrist.’ Brit. med. J., ii, 145–8.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.